Cargando…

Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators

BACKGROUND: Basic life support (BLS) guidelines focus on chest compressions with a minimal no-flow fraction (NFF), early defibrillation, and a short perishock pause. By using an automated external defibrillator (AED) lay persons are guided through the process of attaching electrodes and initiating d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Michael P., Poenicke, Cynthia, Kurth, Maxi, Richter, Torsten, Koch, Thea, Eisold, Carolin, Pfältzer, Adrian, Heller, Axel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26094032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0123-1
_version_ 1782377484581339136
author Müller, Michael P.
Poenicke, Cynthia
Kurth, Maxi
Richter, Torsten
Koch, Thea
Eisold, Carolin
Pfältzer, Adrian
Heller, Axel R.
author_facet Müller, Michael P.
Poenicke, Cynthia
Kurth, Maxi
Richter, Torsten
Koch, Thea
Eisold, Carolin
Pfältzer, Adrian
Heller, Axel R.
author_sort Müller, Michael P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Basic life support (BLS) guidelines focus on chest compressions with a minimal no-flow fraction (NFF), early defibrillation, and a short perishock pause. By using an automated external defibrillator (AED) lay persons are guided through the process of attaching electrodes and initiating defibrillation. It is unclear, however, to what extent the voice instructions given by the AED might influence the quality of initial resuscitation. METHODS: Using a patient simulator, 8 different commercially available AEDs were evaluated within two different BLS scenarios (ventricular fibrillation vs. asystole). A BLS certified instructor acted according to the current European Resuscitation Council 2010 Guidelines and followed all of the AED voice prompts. In a second set of scenarios, the rescuer anticipated the appropriate actions and started already before the AED stopped speaking. A BLS scenario without AED served as the control. All scenarios were run three times. RESULTS: The time until the first chest compression was 25 ± 2 seconds without the AED and ranged from 50 ± 3 to 148 ± 13 seconds with the AED depending on the model used. The NFF was .26 ± .01 without the AED and between .37 ± .01 and .72 ± .01 when an AED was used. The perishock pause ranged from 12 ± 0 to 46 ± 0 seconds. The optimized sequence of actions reduced the NFF, which ranged now from .32 ± .01 to .41 ± .01, and the perishock pause ranging from 1 ± 1 to 19 ± 1 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: Voice prompts given by commercially available AED merely meet the requirements of current evidence in basic life support. Furthermore, there is a significant difference between devices with regard to time until the first chest compression, perishock pause, no-flow fraction and other objective measures of the quality of BLS. However, the BLS quality may be improved with optimized handling of the AED. Thus, rescuers should be trained on the respective AED devices, and manufacturers should expend more effort in improving user guidance to shorten the NFF and perishock pause. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0123-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4475613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44756132015-06-22 Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators Müller, Michael P. Poenicke, Cynthia Kurth, Maxi Richter, Torsten Koch, Thea Eisold, Carolin Pfältzer, Adrian Heller, Axel R. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Basic life support (BLS) guidelines focus on chest compressions with a minimal no-flow fraction (NFF), early defibrillation, and a short perishock pause. By using an automated external defibrillator (AED) lay persons are guided through the process of attaching electrodes and initiating defibrillation. It is unclear, however, to what extent the voice instructions given by the AED might influence the quality of initial resuscitation. METHODS: Using a patient simulator, 8 different commercially available AEDs were evaluated within two different BLS scenarios (ventricular fibrillation vs. asystole). A BLS certified instructor acted according to the current European Resuscitation Council 2010 Guidelines and followed all of the AED voice prompts. In a second set of scenarios, the rescuer anticipated the appropriate actions and started already before the AED stopped speaking. A BLS scenario without AED served as the control. All scenarios were run three times. RESULTS: The time until the first chest compression was 25 ± 2 seconds without the AED and ranged from 50 ± 3 to 148 ± 13 seconds with the AED depending on the model used. The NFF was .26 ± .01 without the AED and between .37 ± .01 and .72 ± .01 when an AED was used. The perishock pause ranged from 12 ± 0 to 46 ± 0 seconds. The optimized sequence of actions reduced the NFF, which ranged now from .32 ± .01 to .41 ± .01, and the perishock pause ranging from 1 ± 1 to 19 ± 1 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: Voice prompts given by commercially available AED merely meet the requirements of current evidence in basic life support. Furthermore, there is a significant difference between devices with regard to time until the first chest compression, perishock pause, no-flow fraction and other objective measures of the quality of BLS. However, the BLS quality may be improved with optimized handling of the AED. Thus, rescuers should be trained on the respective AED devices, and manufacturers should expend more effort in improving user guidance to shorten the NFF and perishock pause. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0123-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4475613/ /pubmed/26094032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0123-1 Text en © Mueller et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Müller, Michael P.
Poenicke, Cynthia
Kurth, Maxi
Richter, Torsten
Koch, Thea
Eisold, Carolin
Pfältzer, Adrian
Heller, Axel R.
Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
title Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
title_full Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
title_fullStr Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
title_short Quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
title_sort quality of basic life support when using different commercially available public access defibrillators
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26094032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-015-0123-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mullermichaelp qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT poenickecynthia qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT kurthmaxi qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT richtertorsten qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT kochthea qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT eisoldcarolin qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT pfaltzeradrian qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators
AT helleraxelr qualityofbasiclifesupportwhenusingdifferentcommerciallyavailablepublicaccessdefibrillators