Cargando…
PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial
Objective To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe pain from traumatic injuries. Design Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Setting Five English hospita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26094763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2988 |
_version_ | 1782377536614825984 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Jason E Rockett, Mark S, Siobhan Creanor Squire, Rosalyn Hayward, Chris Ewings, Paul Barton, Andy Pritchard, Colin Eyre, Victoria Cocking, Laura Benger, Jonathan |
author_facet | Smith, Jason E Rockett, Mark S, Siobhan Creanor Squire, Rosalyn Hayward, Chris Ewings, Paul Barton, Andy Pritchard, Colin Eyre, Victoria Cocking, Laura Benger, Jonathan |
author_sort | Smith, Jason E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe pain from traumatic injuries. Design Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Setting Five English hospitals. Participants 200 adults (71% (n=142) male), aged 18 to 75 years, who presented to the emergency department requiring intravenous opioid analgesia for the treatment of moderate to severe pain from traumatic injuries and were expected to be admitted to hospital for at least 12 hours. Interventions PCA (n=99) or nurse titrated analgesia (treatment as usual; n=101). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was total pain experienced over the 12 hour study period, derived by standardised area under the curve (scaled from 0 to 100) of each participant’s hourly pain scores, captured using a visual analogue scale. Pre-specified secondary outcomes included total morphine use, percentage of study period in moderate/severe pain, percentage of study period asleep, length of hospital stay, and satisfaction with pain management. Results 200 participants were included in the primary analyses. Mean total pain experienced was 47.2 (SD 21.9) for the treatment as usual group and 44.0 (24.0) for the PCA group. Adjusted analyses indicated slightly (but not statistically significantly) lower total pain experienced in the PCA group than in the routine care group (mean difference 2.7, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to 7.8). Participants allocated to PCA used more morphine in total than did participants in the treatment as usual group (mean 44.3 (23.2) v 27.2 (18.2) mg; mean difference 17.0, 11.3 to 22.7). PCA participants spent, on average, less time in moderate/severe pain (36.2% (31.0) v 44.1% (31.6)), but the difference was not statistically significant. A higher proportion of PCA participants reported being perfectly or very satisfied compared with the treatment as usual group (86% (78/91) v 76% (74/98)), but this was also not statistically significant. Conclusions PCA provided no statistically significant reduction in pain compared with routine care for emergency department patients with traumatic injuries. Trial registration European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT2011-000194-31; Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25343280. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4476025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44760252015-06-24 PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial Smith, Jason E Rockett, Mark S, Siobhan Creanor Squire, Rosalyn Hayward, Chris Ewings, Paul Barton, Andy Pritchard, Colin Eyre, Victoria Cocking, Laura Benger, Jonathan BMJ Research Objective To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe pain from traumatic injuries. Design Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Setting Five English hospitals. Participants 200 adults (71% (n=142) male), aged 18 to 75 years, who presented to the emergency department requiring intravenous opioid analgesia for the treatment of moderate to severe pain from traumatic injuries and were expected to be admitted to hospital for at least 12 hours. Interventions PCA (n=99) or nurse titrated analgesia (treatment as usual; n=101). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was total pain experienced over the 12 hour study period, derived by standardised area under the curve (scaled from 0 to 100) of each participant’s hourly pain scores, captured using a visual analogue scale. Pre-specified secondary outcomes included total morphine use, percentage of study period in moderate/severe pain, percentage of study period asleep, length of hospital stay, and satisfaction with pain management. Results 200 participants were included in the primary analyses. Mean total pain experienced was 47.2 (SD 21.9) for the treatment as usual group and 44.0 (24.0) for the PCA group. Adjusted analyses indicated slightly (but not statistically significantly) lower total pain experienced in the PCA group than in the routine care group (mean difference 2.7, 95% confidence interval −2.4 to 7.8). Participants allocated to PCA used more morphine in total than did participants in the treatment as usual group (mean 44.3 (23.2) v 27.2 (18.2) mg; mean difference 17.0, 11.3 to 22.7). PCA participants spent, on average, less time in moderate/severe pain (36.2% (31.0) v 44.1% (31.6)), but the difference was not statistically significant. A higher proportion of PCA participants reported being perfectly or very satisfied compared with the treatment as usual group (86% (78/91) v 76% (74/98)), but this was also not statistically significant. Conclusions PCA provided no statistically significant reduction in pain compared with routine care for emergency department patients with traumatic injuries. Trial registration European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT2011-000194-31; Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25343280. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4476025/ /pubmed/26094763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2988 Text en © Smith et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Smith, Jason E Rockett, Mark S, Siobhan Creanor Squire, Rosalyn Hayward, Chris Ewings, Paul Barton, Andy Pritchard, Colin Eyre, Victoria Cocking, Laura Benger, Jonathan PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
title | PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
title_full | PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
title_fullStr | PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
title_short | PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
title_sort | pain solutions in the emergency setting (pasties)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with pain from traumatic injuries: randomised trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26094763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithjasone painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT rockettmark painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT ssiobhancreanor painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT squirerosalyn painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT haywardchris painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT ewingspaul painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT bartonandy painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT pritchardcolin painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT eyrevictoria painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT cockinglaura painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial AT bengerjonathan painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithpainfromtraumaticinjuriesrandomisedtrial |