Cargando…

PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial

Objective To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in providing effective analgesia for patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe non-traumatic abdominal pain. Design Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Jason E, Rockett, Mark, Creanor, Siobhan, Squire, Rosalyn, Hayward, Chris, Ewings, Paul, Barton, Andy, Pritchard, Colin, Eyre, Victoria, Cocking, Laura, Benger, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26094712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3147
_version_ 1782377536846561280
author Smith, Jason E
Rockett, Mark
Creanor, Siobhan
Squire, Rosalyn
Hayward, Chris
Ewings, Paul
Barton, Andy
Pritchard, Colin
Eyre, Victoria
Cocking, Laura
Benger, Jonathan
author_facet Smith, Jason E
Rockett, Mark
Creanor, Siobhan
Squire, Rosalyn
Hayward, Chris
Ewings, Paul
Barton, Andy
Pritchard, Colin
Eyre, Victoria
Cocking, Laura
Benger, Jonathan
author_sort Smith, Jason E
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in providing effective analgesia for patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe non-traumatic abdominal pain. Design Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial Setting Five English hospitals. Participants 200 adults (66% (n=130) female), aged 18 to 75 years, who presented to the emergency department requiring intravenous opioid analgesia for the treatment of moderate to severe non-traumatic abdominal pain and were expected to be admitted to hospital for at least 12 hours. Interventions Patient controlled analgesia or nurse titrated analgesia (treatment as usual). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was total pain experienced over the 12 hour study period, derived by standardised area under the curve (scaled from 0 to 100) of each participant’s hourly pain scores, captured using a visual analogue scale. Pre-specified secondary outcomes included total morphine use, percentage of study period in moderate or severe pain, percentage of study period asleep, length of hospital stay, and satisfaction with pain management. Results 196 participants were included in the primary analyses (99 allocated to PCA and 97 to treatment as usual). Mean total pain experienced was 35.3 (SD 25.8) in the PCA group compared with 47.3 (24.7) in the treatment as usual group. The adjusted between group difference was 6.3 (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 11.9). Participants in the PCA group received significantly more morphine (mean 36.1 (SD 22.4) v 23.6 (13.1) mg; mean difference 12.3 (95% confidence interval 7.2 to 17.4) mg), spent less of the study period in moderate or severe pain (32.6% v 46.9%; mean difference 14.5% (5.6% to 23.5%)), and were more likely to be perfectly or very satisfied with the management of their pain (83% (73/88) v 66% (57/87); adjusted odds ratio 2.56 (1.25 to 5.23)) in comparison with participants in the treatment as usual group. Conclusions Significant reductions in pain can be achieved by PCA compared with treatment as usual in patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Trial registration European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT2011-000194-31; Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25343280.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4476026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44760262015-06-24 PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial Smith, Jason E Rockett, Mark Creanor, Siobhan Squire, Rosalyn Hayward, Chris Ewings, Paul Barton, Andy Pritchard, Colin Eyre, Victoria Cocking, Laura Benger, Jonathan BMJ Research Objective To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in providing effective analgesia for patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe non-traumatic abdominal pain. Design Pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial Setting Five English hospitals. Participants 200 adults (66% (n=130) female), aged 18 to 75 years, who presented to the emergency department requiring intravenous opioid analgesia for the treatment of moderate to severe non-traumatic abdominal pain and were expected to be admitted to hospital for at least 12 hours. Interventions Patient controlled analgesia or nurse titrated analgesia (treatment as usual). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was total pain experienced over the 12 hour study period, derived by standardised area under the curve (scaled from 0 to 100) of each participant’s hourly pain scores, captured using a visual analogue scale. Pre-specified secondary outcomes included total morphine use, percentage of study period in moderate or severe pain, percentage of study period asleep, length of hospital stay, and satisfaction with pain management. Results 196 participants were included in the primary analyses (99 allocated to PCA and 97 to treatment as usual). Mean total pain experienced was 35.3 (SD 25.8) in the PCA group compared with 47.3 (24.7) in the treatment as usual group. The adjusted between group difference was 6.3 (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 11.9). Participants in the PCA group received significantly more morphine (mean 36.1 (SD 22.4) v 23.6 (13.1) mg; mean difference 12.3 (95% confidence interval 7.2 to 17.4) mg), spent less of the study period in moderate or severe pain (32.6% v 46.9%; mean difference 14.5% (5.6% to 23.5%)), and were more likely to be perfectly or very satisfied with the management of their pain (83% (73/88) v 66% (57/87); adjusted odds ratio 2.56 (1.25 to 5.23)) in comparison with participants in the treatment as usual group. Conclusions Significant reductions in pain can be achieved by PCA compared with treatment as usual in patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Trial registration European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT2011-000194-31; Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25343280. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2015-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4476026/ /pubmed/26094712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3147 Text en © Smith et al 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Jason E
Rockett, Mark
Creanor, Siobhan
Squire, Rosalyn
Hayward, Chris
Ewings, Paul
Barton, Andy
Pritchard, Colin
Eyre, Victoria
Cocking, Laura
Benger, Jonathan
PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
title PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
title_full PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
title_fullStr PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
title_short PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
title_sort pain solutions in the emergency setting (pasties)—patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26094712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3147
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjasone painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT rockettmark painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT creanorsiobhan painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT squirerosalyn painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT haywardchris painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT ewingspaul painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT bartonandy painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT pritchardcolin painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT eyrevictoria painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT cockinglaura painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial
AT bengerjonathan painsolutionsintheemergencysettingpastiespatientcontrolledanalgesiaversusroutinecareinemergencydepartmentpatientswithnontraumaticabdominalpainrandomisedtrial