Cargando…

How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?

Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) represents small, non-directional deviations from perfect symmetry in morphological characters. FA is generally assumed to increase in response to stress; therefore, FA is frequently used in ecological studies as an index of environmental or genetic stress experienced by a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kozlov, Mikhail V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157612
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1027
_version_ 1782377556930985984
author Kozlov, Mikhail V.
author_facet Kozlov, Mikhail V.
author_sort Kozlov, Mikhail V.
collection PubMed
description Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) represents small, non-directional deviations from perfect symmetry in morphological characters. FA is generally assumed to increase in response to stress; therefore, FA is frequently used in ecological studies as an index of environmental or genetic stress experienced by an organism. The values of FA are usually small, and therefore the reliable detection of FA requires precise measurements. The reproducibility of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) was explored by comparing the results of measurements of scanned images of 100 leaves of downy birch (Betula pubescens) conducted by 31 volunteer scientists experienced in studying plant FA. The median values of FA varied significantly among the participants, from 0.000 to 0.074, and the coefficients of variation in FA for individual leaves ranged from 25% to 179%. The overall reproducibility of the results among the participants was rather low (0.074). Variation in instruments and methods used by the participants had little effect on the reported FA values, but the reproducibility of the measurements increased by 30% following exclusion of data provided by seven participants who had modified the suggested protocol for leaf measurements. The scientists working with plant FA are advised to pay utmost attention to adequate and detailed description of their data acquisition protocols in their forthcoming publications, because all characteristics of instruments and methods need to be controlled to increase the quality and reproducibility of the data. Whenever possible, the images of all measured objects and the results of primary measurements should be published as electronic appendices to scientific papers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4476141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44761412015-07-08 How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry? Kozlov, Mikhail V. PeerJ Ecology Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) represents small, non-directional deviations from perfect symmetry in morphological characters. FA is generally assumed to increase in response to stress; therefore, FA is frequently used in ecological studies as an index of environmental or genetic stress experienced by an organism. The values of FA are usually small, and therefore the reliable detection of FA requires precise measurements. The reproducibility of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) was explored by comparing the results of measurements of scanned images of 100 leaves of downy birch (Betula pubescens) conducted by 31 volunteer scientists experienced in studying plant FA. The median values of FA varied significantly among the participants, from 0.000 to 0.074, and the coefficients of variation in FA for individual leaves ranged from 25% to 179%. The overall reproducibility of the results among the participants was rather low (0.074). Variation in instruments and methods used by the participants had little effect on the reported FA values, but the reproducibility of the measurements increased by 30% following exclusion of data provided by seven participants who had modified the suggested protocol for leaf measurements. The scientists working with plant FA are advised to pay utmost attention to adequate and detailed description of their data acquisition protocols in their forthcoming publications, because all characteristics of instruments and methods need to be controlled to increase the quality and reproducibility of the data. Whenever possible, the images of all measured objects and the results of primary measurements should be published as electronic appendices to scientific papers. PeerJ Inc. 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4476141/ /pubmed/26157612 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1027 Text en © 2015 Kozlov http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Kozlov, Mikhail V.
How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
title How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
title_full How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
title_fullStr How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
title_full_unstemmed How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
title_short How reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
title_sort how reproducible are the measurements of leaf fluctuating asymmetry?
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157612
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1027
work_keys_str_mv AT kozlovmikhailv howreproduciblearethemeasurementsofleaffluctuatingasymmetry