Cargando…
Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
OBJECTIVE: Early detection of antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates has critical importance in terms of immediate beginning of the appropriate treatment and increasing of treatment success, such as meningitis, bacteriemia and sepsis. In the present study, it was aimed to compare the anti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101489 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.6683 |
_version_ | 1782377586658115584 |
---|---|
author | Yagmur, Gulhan Ercal, Baris Derya Mengeloglu, Zafer Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu Berk, Elife Saglam, Derya |
author_facet | Yagmur, Gulhan Ercal, Baris Derya Mengeloglu, Zafer Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu Berk, Elife Saglam, Derya |
author_sort | Yagmur, Gulhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Early detection of antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates has critical importance in terms of immediate beginning of the appropriate treatment and increasing of treatment success, such as meningitis, bacteriemia and sepsis. In the present study, it was aimed to compare the antibiotic susceptibility results of Quicolor (Salubris Inc., Massachusetts, USA) and standard disk diffusion method. METHODS: One hundred twenty three isolates were included in this study (80 Enterobacteriaceae, 15 Staphylococci and 28 nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria). Antibiotic susceptibility in clinical isolates was evaluated using Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar and Quicolor (ES and NF) agar plates. RESULTS: For Enterobacteriaceae, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error between the tests were found as 96.8%, 0.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. For Staphylococci, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 95.7%, 3.5%, and 0.8%, respectively. For non fermentative bacteria, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 83.9%, 9.6%, and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quicolor media provided reliable susceptibility results in enteric bacteria and Staphylococci. However, further studies including higher number of nonfermentative bacteria are required to determine whether the chromogenic media are appropriate for this group of bacteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4476340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44763402015-06-22 Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? Yagmur, Gulhan Ercal, Baris Derya Mengeloglu, Zafer Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu Berk, Elife Saglam, Derya Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: Early detection of antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates has critical importance in terms of immediate beginning of the appropriate treatment and increasing of treatment success, such as meningitis, bacteriemia and sepsis. In the present study, it was aimed to compare the antibiotic susceptibility results of Quicolor (Salubris Inc., Massachusetts, USA) and standard disk diffusion method. METHODS: One hundred twenty three isolates were included in this study (80 Enterobacteriaceae, 15 Staphylococci and 28 nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria). Antibiotic susceptibility in clinical isolates was evaluated using Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar and Quicolor (ES and NF) agar plates. RESULTS: For Enterobacteriaceae, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error between the tests were found as 96.8%, 0.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. For Staphylococci, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 95.7%, 3.5%, and 0.8%, respectively. For non fermentative bacteria, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 83.9%, 9.6%, and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quicolor media provided reliable susceptibility results in enteric bacteria and Staphylococci. However, further studies including higher number of nonfermentative bacteria are required to determine whether the chromogenic media are appropriate for this group of bacteria. Professional Medical Publications 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4476340/ /pubmed/26101489 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.6683 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yagmur, Gulhan Ercal, Baris Derya Mengeloglu, Zafer Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu Berk, Elife Saglam, Derya Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
title | Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
title_full | Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
title_fullStr | Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
title_short | Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
title_sort | is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101489 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.6683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yagmurgulhan israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices AT ercalbarisderya israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices AT mengelogluzafer israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices AT sariguzelfatmamutlu israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices AT berkelife israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices AT saglamderya israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices |