Cargando…

Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?

OBJECTIVE: Early detection of antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates has critical importance in terms of immediate beginning of the appropriate treatment and increasing of treatment success, such as meningitis, bacteriemia and sepsis. In the present study, it was aimed to compare the anti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yagmur, Gulhan, Ercal, Baris Derya, Mengeloglu, Zafer, Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu, Berk, Elife, Saglam, Derya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101489
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.6683
_version_ 1782377586658115584
author Yagmur, Gulhan
Ercal, Baris Derya
Mengeloglu, Zafer
Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu
Berk, Elife
Saglam, Derya
author_facet Yagmur, Gulhan
Ercal, Baris Derya
Mengeloglu, Zafer
Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu
Berk, Elife
Saglam, Derya
author_sort Yagmur, Gulhan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Early detection of antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates has critical importance in terms of immediate beginning of the appropriate treatment and increasing of treatment success, such as meningitis, bacteriemia and sepsis. In the present study, it was aimed to compare the antibiotic susceptibility results of Quicolor (Salubris Inc., Massachusetts, USA) and standard disk diffusion method. METHODS: One hundred twenty three isolates were included in this study (80 Enterobacteriaceae, 15 Staphylococci and 28 nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria). Antibiotic susceptibility in clinical isolates was evaluated using Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar and Quicolor (ES and NF) agar plates. RESULTS: For Enterobacteriaceae, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error between the tests were found as 96.8%, 0.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. For Staphylococci, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 95.7%, 3.5%, and 0.8%, respectively. For non fermentative bacteria, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 83.9%, 9.6%, and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quicolor media provided reliable susceptibility results in enteric bacteria and Staphylococci. However, further studies including higher number of nonfermentative bacteria are required to determine whether the chromogenic media are appropriate for this group of bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4476340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44763402015-06-22 Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices? Yagmur, Gulhan Ercal, Baris Derya Mengeloglu, Zafer Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu Berk, Elife Saglam, Derya Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: Early detection of antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolates has critical importance in terms of immediate beginning of the appropriate treatment and increasing of treatment success, such as meningitis, bacteriemia and sepsis. In the present study, it was aimed to compare the antibiotic susceptibility results of Quicolor (Salubris Inc., Massachusetts, USA) and standard disk diffusion method. METHODS: One hundred twenty three isolates were included in this study (80 Enterobacteriaceae, 15 Staphylococci and 28 nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria). Antibiotic susceptibility in clinical isolates was evaluated using Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar and Quicolor (ES and NF) agar plates. RESULTS: For Enterobacteriaceae, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error between the tests were found as 96.8%, 0.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. For Staphylococci, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 95.7%, 3.5%, and 0.8%, respectively. For non fermentative bacteria, frequency of total concordance, major error, and minor error among the tests were found as 83.9%, 9.6%, and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quicolor media provided reliable susceptibility results in enteric bacteria and Staphylococci. However, further studies including higher number of nonfermentative bacteria are required to determine whether the chromogenic media are appropriate for this group of bacteria. Professional Medical Publications 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4476340/ /pubmed/26101489 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.6683 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yagmur, Gulhan
Ercal, Baris Derya
Mengeloglu, Zafer
Sariguzel, Fatma Mutlu
Berk, Elife
Saglam, Derya
Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
title Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
title_full Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
title_fullStr Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
title_full_unstemmed Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
title_short Is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
title_sort is rapid antibacterial susceptibility testing medium reliable for routine laboratory practices?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101489
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.6683
work_keys_str_mv AT yagmurgulhan israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices
AT ercalbarisderya israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices
AT mengelogluzafer israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices
AT sariguzelfatmamutlu israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices
AT berkelife israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices
AT saglamderya israpidantibacterialsusceptibilitytestingmediumreliableforroutinelaboratorypractices