Cargando…

A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice

BACKGROUND: To measure the frequency and nature of wounds in patients treated in general practice and to describe the patients’ tetanus vaccination status and the sources providing information about this status. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, week-long, national electronic survey was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarazin, Marianne, Roberton, Florence, Charles, Rodolphe, Falchi, Alessandra, Chiappe, Solange Gonzales, Blanchon, Thierry, Lucht, Frédéric, Hanslik, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124675
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S75189
_version_ 1782377604166189056
author Sarazin, Marianne
Roberton, Florence
Charles, Rodolphe
Falchi, Alessandra
Chiappe, Solange Gonzales
Blanchon, Thierry
Lucht, Frédéric
Hanslik, Thomas
author_facet Sarazin, Marianne
Roberton, Florence
Charles, Rodolphe
Falchi, Alessandra
Chiappe, Solange Gonzales
Blanchon, Thierry
Lucht, Frédéric
Hanslik, Thomas
author_sort Sarazin, Marianne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To measure the frequency and nature of wounds in patients treated in general practice and to describe the patients’ tetanus vaccination status and the sources providing information about this status. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, week-long, national electronic survey was conducted among general practitioners within the Sentinelles network. RESULTS: The participation rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%–14.6%; 130 general practitioners): 197 patients with wounds were reported, and 175 of them were described. Wound frequency was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2–1.6) per 100 consultations. These wounds had an acute character in 76 (95% CI, 69.7–82.3) of cases, were mostly of traumatic origin (54.8% of cases; 95% CI, 47.5%–62.1%), were more than 24 hours old (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.1%–75.1%), and were clean, without bone and/or muscle decay (94%; 95% CI, 90.5%–97.5%). Vaccination status was known for 71 (95% CI, 64–78) patients. According to the 2013 immunization schedule, 21% (95% CI, 13.9%–28.1%) of the patients had not updated their vaccinations, mostly among the patients older than 75 years. CONCLUSION: This survey describes in detail the wounds treated in general practice in France and the associated patients’ immunization status. It also shows how difficult it is for general practitioners to assess the risk of contracting tetanus and the disease’s development. It highlights as well the fact that the ideal solution to assess tetanus risk is an up-to-date immunization schedule.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4476466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44764662015-06-29 A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice Sarazin, Marianne Roberton, Florence Charles, Rodolphe Falchi, Alessandra Chiappe, Solange Gonzales Blanchon, Thierry Lucht, Frédéric Hanslik, Thomas Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: To measure the frequency and nature of wounds in patients treated in general practice and to describe the patients’ tetanus vaccination status and the sources providing information about this status. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, week-long, national electronic survey was conducted among general practitioners within the Sentinelles network. RESULTS: The participation rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%–14.6%; 130 general practitioners): 197 patients with wounds were reported, and 175 of them were described. Wound frequency was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2–1.6) per 100 consultations. These wounds had an acute character in 76 (95% CI, 69.7–82.3) of cases, were mostly of traumatic origin (54.8% of cases; 95% CI, 47.5%–62.1%), were more than 24 hours old (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.1%–75.1%), and were clean, without bone and/or muscle decay (94%; 95% CI, 90.5%–97.5%). Vaccination status was known for 71 (95% CI, 64–78) patients. According to the 2013 immunization schedule, 21% (95% CI, 13.9%–28.1%) of the patients had not updated their vaccinations, mostly among the patients older than 75 years. CONCLUSION: This survey describes in detail the wounds treated in general practice in France and the associated patients’ immunization status. It also shows how difficult it is for general practitioners to assess the risk of contracting tetanus and the disease’s development. It highlights as well the fact that the ideal solution to assess tetanus risk is an up-to-date immunization schedule. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4476466/ /pubmed/26124675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S75189 Text en © 2015 Sarazin et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sarazin, Marianne
Roberton, Florence
Charles, Rodolphe
Falchi, Alessandra
Chiappe, Solange Gonzales
Blanchon, Thierry
Lucht, Frédéric
Hanslik, Thomas
A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
title A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
title_full A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
title_fullStr A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
title_full_unstemmed A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
title_short A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
title_sort survey of french general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124675
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S75189
work_keys_str_mv AT sarazinmarianne asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT robertonflorence asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT charlesrodolphe asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT falchialessandra asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT chiappesolangegonzales asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT blanchonthierry asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT luchtfrederic asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT hanslikthomas asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT sarazinmarianne surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT robertonflorence surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT charlesrodolphe surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT falchialessandra surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT chiappesolangegonzales surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT blanchonthierry surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT luchtfrederic surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice
AT hanslikthomas surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice