Cargando…
A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice
BACKGROUND: To measure the frequency and nature of wounds in patients treated in general practice and to describe the patients’ tetanus vaccination status and the sources providing information about this status. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, week-long, national electronic survey was conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S75189 |
_version_ | 1782377604166189056 |
---|---|
author | Sarazin, Marianne Roberton, Florence Charles, Rodolphe Falchi, Alessandra Chiappe, Solange Gonzales Blanchon, Thierry Lucht, Frédéric Hanslik, Thomas |
author_facet | Sarazin, Marianne Roberton, Florence Charles, Rodolphe Falchi, Alessandra Chiappe, Solange Gonzales Blanchon, Thierry Lucht, Frédéric Hanslik, Thomas |
author_sort | Sarazin, Marianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To measure the frequency and nature of wounds in patients treated in general practice and to describe the patients’ tetanus vaccination status and the sources providing information about this status. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, week-long, national electronic survey was conducted among general practitioners within the Sentinelles network. RESULTS: The participation rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%–14.6%; 130 general practitioners): 197 patients with wounds were reported, and 175 of them were described. Wound frequency was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2–1.6) per 100 consultations. These wounds had an acute character in 76 (95% CI, 69.7–82.3) of cases, were mostly of traumatic origin (54.8% of cases; 95% CI, 47.5%–62.1%), were more than 24 hours old (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.1%–75.1%), and were clean, without bone and/or muscle decay (94%; 95% CI, 90.5%–97.5%). Vaccination status was known for 71 (95% CI, 64–78) patients. According to the 2013 immunization schedule, 21% (95% CI, 13.9%–28.1%) of the patients had not updated their vaccinations, mostly among the patients older than 75 years. CONCLUSION: This survey describes in detail the wounds treated in general practice in France and the associated patients’ immunization status. It also shows how difficult it is for general practitioners to assess the risk of contracting tetanus and the disease’s development. It highlights as well the fact that the ideal solution to assess tetanus risk is an up-to-date immunization schedule. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4476466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44764662015-06-29 A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice Sarazin, Marianne Roberton, Florence Charles, Rodolphe Falchi, Alessandra Chiappe, Solange Gonzales Blanchon, Thierry Lucht, Frédéric Hanslik, Thomas Int J Gen Med Original Research BACKGROUND: To measure the frequency and nature of wounds in patients treated in general practice and to describe the patients’ tetanus vaccination status and the sources providing information about this status. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, week-long, national electronic survey was conducted among general practitioners within the Sentinelles network. RESULTS: The participation rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%–14.6%; 130 general practitioners): 197 patients with wounds were reported, and 175 of them were described. Wound frequency was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2–1.6) per 100 consultations. These wounds had an acute character in 76 (95% CI, 69.7–82.3) of cases, were mostly of traumatic origin (54.8% of cases; 95% CI, 47.5%–62.1%), were more than 24 hours old (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.1%–75.1%), and were clean, without bone and/or muscle decay (94%; 95% CI, 90.5%–97.5%). Vaccination status was known for 71 (95% CI, 64–78) patients. According to the 2013 immunization schedule, 21% (95% CI, 13.9%–28.1%) of the patients had not updated their vaccinations, mostly among the patients older than 75 years. CONCLUSION: This survey describes in detail the wounds treated in general practice in France and the associated patients’ immunization status. It also shows how difficult it is for general practitioners to assess the risk of contracting tetanus and the disease’s development. It highlights as well the fact that the ideal solution to assess tetanus risk is an up-to-date immunization schedule. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4476466/ /pubmed/26124675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S75189 Text en © 2015 Sarazin et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sarazin, Marianne Roberton, Florence Charles, Rodolphe Falchi, Alessandra Chiappe, Solange Gonzales Blanchon, Thierry Lucht, Frédéric Hanslik, Thomas A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
title | A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
title_full | A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
title_fullStr | A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
title_short | A survey of French general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
title_sort | survey of french general practitioners on the epidemiology of wounds in family practice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124675 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S75189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarazinmarianne asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT robertonflorence asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT charlesrodolphe asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT falchialessandra asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT chiappesolangegonzales asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT blanchonthierry asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT luchtfrederic asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT hanslikthomas asurveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT sarazinmarianne surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT robertonflorence surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT charlesrodolphe surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT falchialessandra surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT chiappesolangegonzales surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT blanchonthierry surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT luchtfrederic surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice AT hanslikthomas surveyoffrenchgeneralpractitionersontheepidemiologyofwoundsinfamilypractice |