Cargando…

Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation

CONTEXT: Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor is gaining importance in ovulation induction. Some prefer to use it as a second line agent in women who fail to respond to clomifene citrate. However, our knowledge about the predictors of response to letrozole is limited. AIMS: The study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palihawadana, Thilina Sanjeewa, Wijesinghe, Prasantha Sudehana, Seneviratne, Harshalal Rukka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157297
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158598
_version_ 1782377763228876800
author Palihawadana, Thilina Sanjeewa
Wijesinghe, Prasantha Sudehana
Seneviratne, Harshalal Rukka
author_facet Palihawadana, Thilina Sanjeewa
Wijesinghe, Prasantha Sudehana
Seneviratne, Harshalal Rukka
author_sort Palihawadana, Thilina Sanjeewa
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor is gaining importance in ovulation induction. Some prefer to use it as a second line agent in women who fail to respond to clomifene citrate. However, our knowledge about the predictors of response to letrozole is limited. AIMS: The study was aimed at identifying the factors associated with letrozole resistance among women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II anovulation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study was conducted at the infertility clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. A case–control study design was used and included 50 subjects with WHO group II anovulation (25 clomifene responsive and 25 clomifene resistant). After a treatment cycle of letrozole, the factors were compared between the subjects who responded and those who failed to respond to treatment. RESULTS: Ovulation was achieved in 76% (n = 19) of subjects who had responded to clomifene previously and in 24% (n = 6) with clomifene resistance. The factors associated with letrozole resistance included the presence of hirsutism (odds ratio [OR]: 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–12.3) and clomifene resistance (OR: 10.03; 95% CI: 2.81–35.7). The early follicular phase mean (standard deviation) luteinizing hormone level was significantly higher among the nonresponders (9.75 [4.78] – 7.28 [2.3]; P = 0.02). Nonresponders showed significantly lower levels of oestradiol on the 5(th) and 9(th) days (28.50 [3.39] pg/mL vs. 7.49 [3.62] pg/mL; P = 0.0007 and 142.04 [76.22] pg/mL vs. 28.10 [12.8] pg/mL; P = 0.0001) of the menstrual cycle, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The features associated with resistance to Letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg show some overlap with those associated with clomifene resistance. However, some features do not show similar association. The effectiveness of letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg in induction of ovulation among women with clomifene resistance is low and it does not seem to be a suitable treatment at a dose of 2.5 mg for this indication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4477453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44774532015-07-08 Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation Palihawadana, Thilina Sanjeewa Wijesinghe, Prasantha Sudehana Seneviratne, Harshalal Rukka J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article CONTEXT: Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor is gaining importance in ovulation induction. Some prefer to use it as a second line agent in women who fail to respond to clomifene citrate. However, our knowledge about the predictors of response to letrozole is limited. AIMS: The study was aimed at identifying the factors associated with letrozole resistance among women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II anovulation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Study was conducted at the infertility clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. A case–control study design was used and included 50 subjects with WHO group II anovulation (25 clomifene responsive and 25 clomifene resistant). After a treatment cycle of letrozole, the factors were compared between the subjects who responded and those who failed to respond to treatment. RESULTS: Ovulation was achieved in 76% (n = 19) of subjects who had responded to clomifene previously and in 24% (n = 6) with clomifene resistance. The factors associated with letrozole resistance included the presence of hirsutism (odds ratio [OR]: 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–12.3) and clomifene resistance (OR: 10.03; 95% CI: 2.81–35.7). The early follicular phase mean (standard deviation) luteinizing hormone level was significantly higher among the nonresponders (9.75 [4.78] – 7.28 [2.3]; P = 0.02). Nonresponders showed significantly lower levels of oestradiol on the 5(th) and 9(th) days (28.50 [3.39] pg/mL vs. 7.49 [3.62] pg/mL; P = 0.0007 and 142.04 [76.22] pg/mL vs. 28.10 [12.8] pg/mL; P = 0.0001) of the menstrual cycle, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The features associated with resistance to Letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg show some overlap with those associated with clomifene resistance. However, some features do not show similar association. The effectiveness of letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg in induction of ovulation among women with clomifene resistance is low and it does not seem to be a suitable treatment at a dose of 2.5 mg for this indication. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4477453/ /pubmed/26157297 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158598 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Palihawadana, Thilina Sanjeewa
Wijesinghe, Prasantha Sudehana
Seneviratne, Harshalal Rukka
Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation
title Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation
title_full Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation
title_fullStr Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation
title_short Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation
title_sort factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with world health organization group ii anovulation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157297
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158598
work_keys_str_mv AT palihawadanathilinasanjeewa factorsassociatedwithnonresponsetoovulationinductionusingletrozoleamongwomenwithworldhealthorganizationgroupiianovulation
AT wijesingheprasanthasudehana factorsassociatedwithnonresponsetoovulationinductionusingletrozoleamongwomenwithworldhealthorganizationgroupiianovulation
AT seneviratneharshalalrukka factorsassociatedwithnonresponsetoovulationinductionusingletrozoleamongwomenwithworldhealthorganizationgroupiianovulation