Cargando…

Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection

CONTEXT: Infertility treatment involves a considerable amount of physical and psychological burden which may impact the outcome. AIM: The objective was to understand the amount of physical and psychological burden in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmic sperm i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mamata, Deenadayal, Ray, Subrat K., Pratap, Kumar, Firuza, Parikh, Birla, Ashish Ramesh, Manish, Banker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157299
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158615
_version_ 1782377763701784576
author Mamata, Deenadayal
Ray, Subrat K.
Pratap, Kumar
Firuza, Parikh
Birla, Ashish Ramesh
Manish, Banker
author_facet Mamata, Deenadayal
Ray, Subrat K.
Pratap, Kumar
Firuza, Parikh
Birla, Ashish Ramesh
Manish, Banker
author_sort Mamata, Deenadayal
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Infertility treatment involves a considerable amount of physical and psychological burden which may impact the outcome. AIM: The objective was to understand the amount of physical and psychological burden in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. SETTING AND DESIGN: Multi-center, prospective, parallel, observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted across 12 IVF centers in India. A total of 692 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation as a part of the first cycle IVF/ICSI completed the trial. Women were recruited in 2 groups based on type of treatment (Group A - gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist; Group B - GnRH agonist) and were asked to fill questionnaires during the 2 treatment visits. RESULTS: The mean changes between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 in anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores in Group A for anxiety and depression were −0.5 (3.67), −0.1 (3.57) respectively and for Group B were −0.4 (3.68), 0.1 (3.67) respectively, which was not statistically significant. In Group A, the mean (±standard deviation [SD]) Hopkins Symptom Check List (HSCL) score was 17.9 (±5.17) in visit 1 and 19.1 (±5.45) Visit 2. The change between visits was 1.1 (P < 0.0001) with higher score reflecting higher somatic distress symptoms. In Group B, the mean (±SD) HSCL score was 18.2 (±5.19) in Visit 1 and 18.8 (±5.23) in visit 2. The change between visits was 0.6 (P < 0.0014). The difference of the mean change in physical burden between Group A and Group B was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A significant impact in both treatment protocols with respect to the physical burden was found between Visit 1 and Visit 2 but no difference in physical or psychological burden between the two treatment groups was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4477455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44774552015-07-08 Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection Mamata, Deenadayal Ray, Subrat K. Pratap, Kumar Firuza, Parikh Birla, Ashish Ramesh Manish, Banker J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article CONTEXT: Infertility treatment involves a considerable amount of physical and psychological burden which may impact the outcome. AIM: The objective was to understand the amount of physical and psychological burden in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. SETTING AND DESIGN: Multi-center, prospective, parallel, observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted across 12 IVF centers in India. A total of 692 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation as a part of the first cycle IVF/ICSI completed the trial. Women were recruited in 2 groups based on type of treatment (Group A - gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist; Group B - GnRH agonist) and were asked to fill questionnaires during the 2 treatment visits. RESULTS: The mean changes between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 in anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scores in Group A for anxiety and depression were −0.5 (3.67), −0.1 (3.57) respectively and for Group B were −0.4 (3.68), 0.1 (3.67) respectively, which was not statistically significant. In Group A, the mean (±standard deviation [SD]) Hopkins Symptom Check List (HSCL) score was 17.9 (±5.17) in visit 1 and 19.1 (±5.45) Visit 2. The change between visits was 1.1 (P < 0.0001) with higher score reflecting higher somatic distress symptoms. In Group B, the mean (±SD) HSCL score was 18.2 (±5.19) in Visit 1 and 18.8 (±5.23) in visit 2. The change between visits was 0.6 (P < 0.0014). The difference of the mean change in physical burden between Group A and Group B was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A significant impact in both treatment protocols with respect to the physical burden was found between Visit 1 and Visit 2 but no difference in physical or psychological burden between the two treatment groups was observed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4477455/ /pubmed/26157299 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158615 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mamata, Deenadayal
Ray, Subrat K.
Pratap, Kumar
Firuza, Parikh
Birla, Ashish Ramesh
Manish, Banker
Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
title Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
title_fullStr Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
title_short Impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
title_sort impact of different controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on the physical and psychological burdens in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157299
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158615
work_keys_str_mv AT mamatadeenadayal impactofdifferentcontrolledovarianstimulationprotocolsonthephysicalandpsychologicalburdensinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT raysubratk impactofdifferentcontrolledovarianstimulationprotocolsonthephysicalandpsychologicalburdensinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT pratapkumar impactofdifferentcontrolledovarianstimulationprotocolsonthephysicalandpsychologicalburdensinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT firuzaparikh impactofdifferentcontrolledovarianstimulationprotocolsonthephysicalandpsychologicalburdensinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT birlaashishramesh impactofdifferentcontrolledovarianstimulationprotocolsonthephysicalandpsychologicalburdensinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection
AT manishbanker impactofdifferentcontrolledovarianstimulationprotocolsonthephysicalandpsychologicalburdensinwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationintracytoplasmicsperminjection