Cargando…

Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of randomized, sham-controlled trials that are adequately powered, using validated outcomes, to allow for firm recommendations on the use of magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence. We report a protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Renly, Liong, Men Long, Leong, Wing Seng, Khan, Nurzalina Abdul Karim, Yuen, Kah Hay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0803-1
_version_ 1782377777896357888
author Lim, Renly
Liong, Men Long
Leong, Wing Seng
Khan, Nurzalina Abdul Karim
Yuen, Kah Hay
author_facet Lim, Renly
Liong, Men Long
Leong, Wing Seng
Khan, Nurzalina Abdul Karim
Yuen, Kah Hay
author_sort Lim, Renly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of randomized, sham-controlled trials that are adequately powered, using validated outcomes, to allow for firm recommendations on the use of magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence. We report a protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred twenty subjects with stress urinary incontinence will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to either active or sham magnetic stimulation using computer-generated, permuted blocks of variable sizes. Subjects will receive 2 sessions of magnetic stimulation per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total). The primary outcome is the improvement in severity of involuntary urine loss based on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Short Form at the end of treatment sessions compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes include cure, stress urinary incontinence–related symptoms (incontinence episode frequency, urine loss in 1-hour pad test, pelvic floor muscle strength) and health-related quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life and EQ-5D). The safety of magnetic stimulation will also be assessed. Besides evaluation of clinical treatment effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis using patient-reported outcomes will be performed. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to provide pending outcome information on this non-invasive treatment option. We intend to acknowledge the existing flaws in previous clinical trials and determine conclusively whether magnetic stimulation is effective for stress urinary incontinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01924728. Date of Registration: 14 August 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0803-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4477591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44775912015-06-24 Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Lim, Renly Liong, Men Long Leong, Wing Seng Khan, Nurzalina Abdul Karim Yuen, Kah Hay Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of randomized, sham-controlled trials that are adequately powered, using validated outcomes, to allow for firm recommendations on the use of magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence. We report a protocol of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred twenty subjects with stress urinary incontinence will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to either active or sham magnetic stimulation using computer-generated, permuted blocks of variable sizes. Subjects will receive 2 sessions of magnetic stimulation per week for 8 weeks (16 sessions total). The primary outcome is the improvement in severity of involuntary urine loss based on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Short Form at the end of treatment sessions compared with baseline. Secondary outcomes include cure, stress urinary incontinence–related symptoms (incontinence episode frequency, urine loss in 1-hour pad test, pelvic floor muscle strength) and health-related quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life and EQ-5D). The safety of magnetic stimulation will also be assessed. Besides evaluation of clinical treatment effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis using patient-reported outcomes will be performed. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to provide pending outcome information on this non-invasive treatment option. We intend to acknowledge the existing flaws in previous clinical trials and determine conclusively whether magnetic stimulation is effective for stress urinary incontinence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01924728. Date of Registration: 14 August 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0803-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4477591/ /pubmed/26093910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0803-1 Text en © Lim et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Lim, Renly
Liong, Men Long
Leong, Wing Seng
Khan, Nurzalina Abdul Karim
Yuen, Kah Hay
Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort magnetic stimulation for stress urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0803-1
work_keys_str_mv AT limrenly magneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liongmenlong magneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leongwingseng magneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khannurzalinaabdulkarim magneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuenkahhay magneticstimulationforstressurinaryincontinencestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial