Cargando…
Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16–70 years on stable doses of 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12681 |
_version_ | 1782377828345446400 |
---|---|
author | Wechsler, Robert T Li, George French, Jacqueline O'Brien, Terence J D'Cruz, O'Neill Williams, Paulette Goodson, Robin Brock, Melissa |
author_facet | Wechsler, Robert T Li, George French, Jacqueline O'Brien, Terence J D'Cruz, O'Neill Williams, Paulette Goodson, Robin Brock, Melissa |
author_sort | Wechsler, Robert T |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16–70 years on stable doses of 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2–40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier–predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier–predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6–35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8–37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4477913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44779132015-06-24 Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study Wechsler, Robert T Li, George French, Jacqueline O'Brien, Terence J D'Cruz, O'Neill Williams, Paulette Goodson, Robin Brock, Melissa Epilepsia Full-Length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16–70 years on stable doses of 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2–40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier–predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier–predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6–35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8–37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-07 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4477913/ /pubmed/24915838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12681 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Full-Length Original Research Wechsler, Robert T Li, George French, Jacqueline O'Brien, Terence J D'Cruz, O'Neill Williams, Paulette Goodson, Robin Brock, Melissa Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
title | Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
title_full | Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
title_fullStr | Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
title_full_unstemmed | Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
title_short | Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
title_sort | conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study |
topic | Full-Length Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wechslerrobertt conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT ligeorge conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT frenchjacqueline conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT obrienterencej conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT dcruzoneill conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT williamspaulette conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT goodsonrobin conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy AT brockmelissa conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy |