Cargando…

Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16–70 years on stable doses of 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wechsler, Robert T, Li, George, French, Jacqueline, O'Brien, Terence J, D'Cruz, O'Neill, Williams, Paulette, Goodson, Robin, Brock, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12681
_version_ 1782377828345446400
author Wechsler, Robert T
Li, George
French, Jacqueline
O'Brien, Terence J
D'Cruz, O'Neill
Williams, Paulette
Goodson, Robin
Brock, Melissa
author_facet Wechsler, Robert T
Li, George
French, Jacqueline
O'Brien, Terence J
D'Cruz, O'Neill
Williams, Paulette
Goodson, Robin
Brock, Melissa
author_sort Wechsler, Robert T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16–70 years on stable doses of 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2–40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier–predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier–predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6–35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8–37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4477913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44779132015-06-24 Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study Wechsler, Robert T Li, George French, Jacqueline O'Brien, Terence J D'Cruz, O'Neill Williams, Paulette Goodson, Robin Brock, Melissa Epilepsia Full-Length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy. METHODS: This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16–70 years on stable doses of 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2–40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier–predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier–predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6–35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8–37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-07 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4477913/ /pubmed/24915838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12681 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full-Length Original Research
Wechsler, Robert T
Li, George
French, Jacqueline
O'Brien, Terence J
D'Cruz, O'Neill
Williams, Paulette
Goodson, Robin
Brock, Melissa
Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
title Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
title_full Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
title_fullStr Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
title_full_unstemmed Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
title_short Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: Results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
title_sort conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study
topic Full-Length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24915838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.12681
work_keys_str_mv AT wechslerrobertt conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT ligeorge conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT frenchjacqueline conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT obrienterencej conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT dcruzoneill conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT williamspaulette conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT goodsonrobin conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy
AT brockmelissa conversiontolacosamidemonotherapyinthetreatmentoffocalepilepsyresultsfromahistoricalcontrolledmulticenterdoubleblindstudy