Cargando…

Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity

There is a general conception that positive associations to one’s trait, e.g. ‘I’m clever’, are beneficial for cognitive performance. Scientific evidence shows that this is a simplification. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we used written trial-based trait feedback ‘you ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appelgren, Alva, Bengtsson, Sara L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26102501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129714
_version_ 1782377829511462912
author Appelgren, Alva
Bengtsson, Sara L
author_facet Appelgren, Alva
Bengtsson, Sara L
author_sort Appelgren, Alva
collection PubMed
description There is a general conception that positive associations to one’s trait, e.g. ‘I’m clever’, are beneficial for cognitive performance. Scientific evidence shows that this is a simplification. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we used written trial-based trait feedback ‘you are clever’, or task feedback ‘your choice was correct’, on each correct response of a rule-switching task, to investigate how the character of positive self-associations influences performance outcome. Twenty participants took part in this crossover design study. We found that trait feedback was less beneficial for motivation and performance improvement, and resulting in enhanced neural activation on more difficult bivalent rule trials. This indicates that the task was treated as more complex in this condition. For example, ‘you are clever’ feedback led to enhanced activation in anterior caudate nucleus, an area known to process uncertainty. We further observed that activation in anterior paracingulate cortex was sensitive to whether self-reflection was imposed by external feedback or generated from internal processes, where the latter activation correlated positively with performance when following after task feedback. Our results illustrate how feedback can evoke self-reflections that either help or hinder motivation and performance, most likely by impacting on processes of uncertainty. The results support social psychological models stipulating that trait focus take resources away from task focus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4477935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44779352015-07-02 Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity Appelgren, Alva Bengtsson, Sara L PLoS One Research Article There is a general conception that positive associations to one’s trait, e.g. ‘I’m clever’, are beneficial for cognitive performance. Scientific evidence shows that this is a simplification. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we used written trial-based trait feedback ‘you are clever’, or task feedback ‘your choice was correct’, on each correct response of a rule-switching task, to investigate how the character of positive self-associations influences performance outcome. Twenty participants took part in this crossover design study. We found that trait feedback was less beneficial for motivation and performance improvement, and resulting in enhanced neural activation on more difficult bivalent rule trials. This indicates that the task was treated as more complex in this condition. For example, ‘you are clever’ feedback led to enhanced activation in anterior caudate nucleus, an area known to process uncertainty. We further observed that activation in anterior paracingulate cortex was sensitive to whether self-reflection was imposed by external feedback or generated from internal processes, where the latter activation correlated positively with performance when following after task feedback. Our results illustrate how feedback can evoke self-reflections that either help or hinder motivation and performance, most likely by impacting on processes of uncertainty. The results support social psychological models stipulating that trait focus take resources away from task focus. Public Library of Science 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4477935/ /pubmed/26102501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129714 Text en © 2015 Appelgren, Bengtsson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Appelgren, Alva
Bengtsson, Sara L
Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
title Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
title_full Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
title_fullStr Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
title_full_unstemmed Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
title_short Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
title_sort feedback on trait or action impacts on caudate and paracingulum activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26102501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129714
work_keys_str_mv AT appelgrenalva feedbackontraitoractionimpactsoncaudateandparacingulumactivity
AT bengtssonsaral feedbackontraitoractionimpactsoncaudateandparacingulumactivity