Cargando…
Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity
There is a general conception that positive associations to one’s trait, e.g. ‘I’m clever’, are beneficial for cognitive performance. Scientific evidence shows that this is a simplification. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we used written trial-based trait feedback ‘you ar...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26102501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129714 |
_version_ | 1782377829511462912 |
---|---|
author | Appelgren, Alva Bengtsson, Sara L |
author_facet | Appelgren, Alva Bengtsson, Sara L |
author_sort | Appelgren, Alva |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a general conception that positive associations to one’s trait, e.g. ‘I’m clever’, are beneficial for cognitive performance. Scientific evidence shows that this is a simplification. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we used written trial-based trait feedback ‘you are clever’, or task feedback ‘your choice was correct’, on each correct response of a rule-switching task, to investigate how the character of positive self-associations influences performance outcome. Twenty participants took part in this crossover design study. We found that trait feedback was less beneficial for motivation and performance improvement, and resulting in enhanced neural activation on more difficult bivalent rule trials. This indicates that the task was treated as more complex in this condition. For example, ‘you are clever’ feedback led to enhanced activation in anterior caudate nucleus, an area known to process uncertainty. We further observed that activation in anterior paracingulate cortex was sensitive to whether self-reflection was imposed by external feedback or generated from internal processes, where the latter activation correlated positively with performance when following after task feedback. Our results illustrate how feedback can evoke self-reflections that either help or hinder motivation and performance, most likely by impacting on processes of uncertainty. The results support social psychological models stipulating that trait focus take resources away from task focus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4477935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44779352015-07-02 Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity Appelgren, Alva Bengtsson, Sara L PLoS One Research Article There is a general conception that positive associations to one’s trait, e.g. ‘I’m clever’, are beneficial for cognitive performance. Scientific evidence shows that this is a simplification. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study we used written trial-based trait feedback ‘you are clever’, or task feedback ‘your choice was correct’, on each correct response of a rule-switching task, to investigate how the character of positive self-associations influences performance outcome. Twenty participants took part in this crossover design study. We found that trait feedback was less beneficial for motivation and performance improvement, and resulting in enhanced neural activation on more difficult bivalent rule trials. This indicates that the task was treated as more complex in this condition. For example, ‘you are clever’ feedback led to enhanced activation in anterior caudate nucleus, an area known to process uncertainty. We further observed that activation in anterior paracingulate cortex was sensitive to whether self-reflection was imposed by external feedback or generated from internal processes, where the latter activation correlated positively with performance when following after task feedback. Our results illustrate how feedback can evoke self-reflections that either help or hinder motivation and performance, most likely by impacting on processes of uncertainty. The results support social psychological models stipulating that trait focus take resources away from task focus. Public Library of Science 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4477935/ /pubmed/26102501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129714 Text en © 2015 Appelgren, Bengtsson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Appelgren, Alva Bengtsson, Sara L Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity |
title | Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity |
title_full | Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity |
title_fullStr | Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity |
title_full_unstemmed | Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity |
title_short | Feedback on Trait or Action Impacts on Caudate and Paracingulum Activity |
title_sort | feedback on trait or action impacts on caudate and paracingulum activity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26102501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT appelgrenalva feedbackontraitoractionimpactsoncaudateandparacingulumactivity AT bengtssonsaral feedbackontraitoractionimpactsoncaudateandparacingulumactivity |