Cargando…
Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools
Sleep spindle properties index cognitive faculties such as memory consolidation and diseases such as major depression. For this reason, scoring sleep spindle properties in polysomnographic recordings has become an important activity in both research and clinical settings. The tediousness of this man...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4478395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00353 |
_version_ | 1782377883353743360 |
---|---|
author | O'Reilly, Christian Nielsen, Tore |
author_facet | O'Reilly, Christian Nielsen, Tore |
author_sort | O'Reilly, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sleep spindle properties index cognitive faculties such as memory consolidation and diseases such as major depression. For this reason, scoring sleep spindle properties in polysomnographic recordings has become an important activity in both research and clinical settings. The tediousness of this manual task has motivated efforts for its automation. Although some progress has been made, increasing the temporal accuracy of spindle scoring and improving the performance assessment methodology are two aspects needing more attention. In this paper, four open-access automated spindle detectors with fine temporal resolution are proposed and tested against expert scoring of two proprietary and two open-access databases. Results highlight several findings: (1) that expert scoring and polysomnographic databases are important confounders when comparing the performance of spindle detectors tested using different databases or scorings; (2) because spindles are sparse events, specificity estimates are potentially misleading for assessing automated detector performance; (3) reporting the performance of spindle detectors exclusively with sensitivity and specificity estimates, as is often seen in the literature, is insufficient; including sensitivity, precision and a more comprehensive statistic such as Matthew's correlation coefficient, F1-score, or Cohen's κ is necessary for adequate evaluation; (4) reporting statistics for some reasonable range of decision thresholds provides a much more complete and useful benchmarking; (5) performance differences between tested automated detectors were found to be similar to those between available expert scorings; (6) much more development is needed to effectively compare the performance of spindle detectors developed by different research teams. Finally, this work clarifies a long-standing but only seldomly posed question regarding whether expert scoring truly is a reliable gold standard for sleep spindle assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4478395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44783952015-07-08 Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools O'Reilly, Christian Nielsen, Tore Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Sleep spindle properties index cognitive faculties such as memory consolidation and diseases such as major depression. For this reason, scoring sleep spindle properties in polysomnographic recordings has become an important activity in both research and clinical settings. The tediousness of this manual task has motivated efforts for its automation. Although some progress has been made, increasing the temporal accuracy of spindle scoring and improving the performance assessment methodology are two aspects needing more attention. In this paper, four open-access automated spindle detectors with fine temporal resolution are proposed and tested against expert scoring of two proprietary and two open-access databases. Results highlight several findings: (1) that expert scoring and polysomnographic databases are important confounders when comparing the performance of spindle detectors tested using different databases or scorings; (2) because spindles are sparse events, specificity estimates are potentially misleading for assessing automated detector performance; (3) reporting the performance of spindle detectors exclusively with sensitivity and specificity estimates, as is often seen in the literature, is insufficient; including sensitivity, precision and a more comprehensive statistic such as Matthew's correlation coefficient, F1-score, or Cohen's κ is necessary for adequate evaluation; (4) reporting statistics for some reasonable range of decision thresholds provides a much more complete and useful benchmarking; (5) performance differences between tested automated detectors were found to be similar to those between available expert scorings; (6) much more development is needed to effectively compare the performance of spindle detectors developed by different research teams. Finally, this work clarifies a long-standing but only seldomly posed question regarding whether expert scoring truly is a reliable gold standard for sleep spindle assessment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4478395/ /pubmed/26157375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00353 Text en Copyright © 2015 O'Reilly and Nielsen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience O'Reilly, Christian Nielsen, Tore Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
title | Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
title_full | Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
title_fullStr | Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
title_short | Automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
title_sort | automatic sleep spindle detection: benchmarking with fine temporal resolution using open science tools |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4478395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oreillychristian automaticsleepspindledetectionbenchmarkingwithfinetemporalresolutionusingopensciencetools AT nielsentore automaticsleepspindledetectionbenchmarkingwithfinetemporalresolutionusingopensciencetools |