Cargando…

Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations

OBJECTIVE: Just as HIV prevention programs need to be tailored to the local epidemic, so should evaluations be country-owned and country-led to ensure use of those results in decision making and policy. The objective of this paper is to describe the process undertaken in Ghana to develop a national...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Heidi W, Atuahene, Kyeremeh, Sutherland, Elizabeth, Amenyah, Richard, Kwao, Isaiah Doe, Larbi, Emmanuel Tettey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120495
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000389
_version_ 1782377975324344320
author Reynolds, Heidi W
Atuahene, Kyeremeh
Sutherland, Elizabeth
Amenyah, Richard
Kwao, Isaiah Doe
Larbi, Emmanuel Tettey
author_facet Reynolds, Heidi W
Atuahene, Kyeremeh
Sutherland, Elizabeth
Amenyah, Richard
Kwao, Isaiah Doe
Larbi, Emmanuel Tettey
author_sort Reynolds, Heidi W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Just as HIV prevention programs need to be tailored to the local epidemic, so should evaluations be country-owned and country-led to ensure use of those results in decision making and policy. The objective of this paper is to describe the process undertaken in Ghana to develop a national evaluation plan for the Ghana national strategy for key populations. METHODS: This was a participatory process that involved meetings between the Ghana AIDS Commission (GAC), other partners in Ghana working to prevent HIV among key populations, and MEASURE Evaluation. The process included three two-day, highly structured yet participatory meetings over the course of 12 months during which participants shared information about on-going and planned data and identified research questions and methods. RESULTS: An evaluation plan was prepared to inform stakeholders about which data collection activities need to be prioritized for funding, who would implement the study, the timing of data collection, the research question the data will help answer, and the analysis methods. The plan discusses various methods that can be used including the recommendation for the study design using multiple data sources. It has an evaluation conceptual model, proposed analyses, proposed definition of independent variables, estimated costs for filling data gaps, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders to carry out the plan, and considerations for ethics, data sharing and authorship. CONCLUSION: The experience demonstrates that it is possible to design an evaluation responsive to national strategies and priorities with country leadership, regardless of stakeholders' experiences with evaluations. This process may be replicable elsewhere, where stakeholders want to plan and implement an evaluation of a large-scale program at the national or subnational level that is responsive to national priorities and part of a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4479146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44791462015-06-24 Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations Reynolds, Heidi W Atuahene, Kyeremeh Sutherland, Elizabeth Amenyah, Richard Kwao, Isaiah Doe Larbi, Emmanuel Tettey J AIDS Clin Res Article OBJECTIVE: Just as HIV prevention programs need to be tailored to the local epidemic, so should evaluations be country-owned and country-led to ensure use of those results in decision making and policy. The objective of this paper is to describe the process undertaken in Ghana to develop a national evaluation plan for the Ghana national strategy for key populations. METHODS: This was a participatory process that involved meetings between the Ghana AIDS Commission (GAC), other partners in Ghana working to prevent HIV among key populations, and MEASURE Evaluation. The process included three two-day, highly structured yet participatory meetings over the course of 12 months during which participants shared information about on-going and planned data and identified research questions and methods. RESULTS: An evaluation plan was prepared to inform stakeholders about which data collection activities need to be prioritized for funding, who would implement the study, the timing of data collection, the research question the data will help answer, and the analysis methods. The plan discusses various methods that can be used including the recommendation for the study design using multiple data sources. It has an evaluation conceptual model, proposed analyses, proposed definition of independent variables, estimated costs for filling data gaps, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders to carry out the plan, and considerations for ethics, data sharing and authorship. CONCLUSION: The experience demonstrates that it is possible to design an evaluation responsive to national strategies and priorities with country leadership, regardless of stakeholders' experiences with evaluations. This process may be replicable elsewhere, where stakeholders want to plan and implement an evaluation of a large-scale program at the national or subnational level that is responsive to national priorities and part of a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation system. 2014-12-02 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4479146/ /pubmed/26120495 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000389 Text en © 2014 Reynolds HW, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Reynolds, Heidi W
Atuahene, Kyeremeh
Sutherland, Elizabeth
Amenyah, Richard
Kwao, Isaiah Doe
Larbi, Emmanuel Tettey
Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations
title Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations
title_full Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations
title_fullStr Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations
title_short Development of a Nationally Coordinated Evaluation Plan for the Ghana National Strategy for Key Populations
title_sort development of a nationally coordinated evaluation plan for the ghana national strategy for key populations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120495
http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000389
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsheidiw developmentofanationallycoordinatedevaluationplanfortheghananationalstrategyforkeypopulations
AT atuahenekyeremeh developmentofanationallycoordinatedevaluationplanfortheghananationalstrategyforkeypopulations
AT sutherlandelizabeth developmentofanationallycoordinatedevaluationplanfortheghananationalstrategyforkeypopulations
AT amenyahrichard developmentofanationallycoordinatedevaluationplanfortheghananationalstrategyforkeypopulations
AT kwaoisaiahdoe developmentofanationallycoordinatedevaluationplanfortheghananationalstrategyforkeypopulations
AT larbiemmanueltettey developmentofanationallycoordinatedevaluationplanfortheghananationalstrategyforkeypopulations