Cargando…
Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community
Drinking water quality in the United States (US) is among the safest in the world. However, many residents, often in rural areas, rely on unregulated private wells or small municipal utilities for water needs. These utilities may violate the Safe Drinking Water Act contaminant guidelines, often beca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w7031217 |
_version_ | 1782377989655232512 |
---|---|
author | Lothrop, Nathan Wilkinson, Sarah T. Verhougstraete, Marc Sugeng, Anastasia Loh, Miranda M. Klimecki, Walter Beamer, Paloma I. |
author_facet | Lothrop, Nathan Wilkinson, Sarah T. Verhougstraete, Marc Sugeng, Anastasia Loh, Miranda M. Klimecki, Walter Beamer, Paloma I. |
author_sort | Lothrop, Nathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drinking water quality in the United States (US) is among the safest in the world. However, many residents, often in rural areas, rely on unregulated private wells or small municipal utilities for water needs. These utilities may violate the Safe Drinking Water Act contaminant guidelines, often because they lack the required financial resources. Residents may use alternative water sources or install a home water treatment system. Despite increased home water treatment adoption, few studies have examined their use and effectiveness in the US. Our study addresses this knowledge gap by examining home water treatment in a rural Arizona community. Water samples were analyzed for metal(loid)s, and home treatment and demographic data were recorded in 31 homes. Approximately 42% of homes treated their water. Independent of source water quality, residents with higher income (OR = 1.25; 95%CI (1.00 – 1.64)) and education levels (OR = 1.49; 95%CI (1.12 – 2.12)) were more likely to treat their water. Some contaminant concentrations were effectively reduced with treatment, while some were not. We conclude that increased educational outreach on contaminant testing and treatment, especially to rural areas with endemic water contamination, would result in a greater public health impact while reducing rural health disparities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4479291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44792912015-06-24 Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community Lothrop, Nathan Wilkinson, Sarah T. Verhougstraete, Marc Sugeng, Anastasia Loh, Miranda M. Klimecki, Walter Beamer, Paloma I. Water (Basel) Article Drinking water quality in the United States (US) is among the safest in the world. However, many residents, often in rural areas, rely on unregulated private wells or small municipal utilities for water needs. These utilities may violate the Safe Drinking Water Act contaminant guidelines, often because they lack the required financial resources. Residents may use alternative water sources or install a home water treatment system. Despite increased home water treatment adoption, few studies have examined their use and effectiveness in the US. Our study addresses this knowledge gap by examining home water treatment in a rural Arizona community. Water samples were analyzed for metal(loid)s, and home treatment and demographic data were recorded in 31 homes. Approximately 42% of homes treated their water. Independent of source water quality, residents with higher income (OR = 1.25; 95%CI (1.00 – 1.64)) and education levels (OR = 1.49; 95%CI (1.12 – 2.12)) were more likely to treat their water. Some contaminant concentrations were effectively reduced with treatment, while some were not. We conclude that increased educational outreach on contaminant testing and treatment, especially to rural areas with endemic water contamination, would result in a greater public health impact while reducing rural health disparities. 2015-03-18 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4479291/ /pubmed/26120482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w7031217 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lothrop, Nathan Wilkinson, Sarah T. Verhougstraete, Marc Sugeng, Anastasia Loh, Miranda M. Klimecki, Walter Beamer, Paloma I. Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community |
title | Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community |
title_full | Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community |
title_fullStr | Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community |
title_full_unstemmed | Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community |
title_short | Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community |
title_sort | home water treatment habits and effectiveness in a rural arizona community |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w7031217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lothropnathan homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity AT wilkinsonsaraht homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity AT verhougstraetemarc homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity AT sugenganastasia homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity AT lohmirandam homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity AT klimeckiwalter homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity AT beamerpalomai homewatertreatmenthabitsandeffectivenessinaruralarizonacommunity |