Cargando…

Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal method for screening investigations is one which is as free as possible from side effects, is easily learnt, and can therefore be broadly used to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with a high degree of certainty. Although ultrasonography fulfils these crite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schäberle, W., Leyerer, L., Schierling, W., Pfister, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1411-1
_version_ 1782378001225220096
author Schäberle, W.
Leyerer, L.
Schierling, W.
Pfister, K.
author_facet Schäberle, W.
Leyerer, L.
Schierling, W.
Pfister, K.
author_sort Schäberle, W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal method for screening investigations is one which is as free as possible from side effects, is easily learnt, and can therefore be broadly used to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with a high degree of certainty. Although ultrasonography fulfils these criteria, the measurement method is not standardized. Different measurement methods are used in ultrasonography as well as in computed tomography (CT) studies and the measurement method is actually described sufficiently in only 57 % of cases. METHODS: This article provides a critical review of the current literature on measurement methods and the validity of ultrasonography for the determination of aortic diameter, particularly in AAA, and presents the measurement principles for making measurements as precisely as possible. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The most precise determination of aortic diameter is carried out by electrocardiogram (ECG) gating according to the leading-edge method with orthogonal slicing. Within the framework of screening investigations, sufficient measurement precision can be achieved by adherence to orthogonal slicing. Using these standardized measurement methods, ultrasonography shows valid and reproducible results even compared with CT and is the method of choice in screening investigations for AAA. Electronic Supplementary Material is available for this article at 10.1007/s00772-014-1411-1 and accessible for authorised users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4479382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44793822015-06-26 Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version Schäberle, W. Leyerer, L. Schierling, W. Pfister, K. Gefasschirurgie Leitthema BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ideal method for screening investigations is one which is as free as possible from side effects, is easily learnt, and can therefore be broadly used to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with a high degree of certainty. Although ultrasonography fulfils these criteria, the measurement method is not standardized. Different measurement methods are used in ultrasonography as well as in computed tomography (CT) studies and the measurement method is actually described sufficiently in only 57 % of cases. METHODS: This article provides a critical review of the current literature on measurement methods and the validity of ultrasonography for the determination of aortic diameter, particularly in AAA, and presents the measurement principles for making measurements as precisely as possible. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The most precise determination of aortic diameter is carried out by electrocardiogram (ECG) gating according to the leading-edge method with orthogonal slicing. Within the framework of screening investigations, sufficient measurement precision can be achieved by adherence to orthogonal slicing. Using these standardized measurement methods, ultrasonography shows valid and reproducible results even compared with CT and is the method of choice in screening investigations for AAA. Electronic Supplementary Material is available for this article at 10.1007/s00772-014-1411-1 and accessible for authorised users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-01-31 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4479382/ /pubmed/26119947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1411-1 Text en © ©The Author(s) (2015) This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Leitthema
Schäberle, W.
Leyerer, L.
Schierling, W.
Pfister, K.
Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version
title Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version
title_full Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version
title_fullStr Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version
title_short Ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: English version
title_sort ultrasound diagnostics of the abdominal aorta: english version
topic Leitthema
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1411-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schaberlew ultrasounddiagnosticsoftheabdominalaortaenglishversion
AT leyererl ultrasounddiagnosticsoftheabdominalaortaenglishversion
AT schierlingw ultrasounddiagnosticsoftheabdominalaortaenglishversion
AT pfisterk ultrasounddiagnosticsoftheabdominalaortaenglishversion