Cargando…

Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras

This study investigated prey captures in free-ranging adult female Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) using head-mounted 3-axis accelerometers and animal-borne video cameras. Acceleration data was used to identify individual attempted prey captures (APC), and video data were use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volpov, Beth L., Hoskins, Andrew J., Battaile, Brian C., Viviant, Morgane, Wheatley, Kathryn E., Marshall, Greg, Abernathy, Kyler, Arnould, John P. Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26107647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128789
_version_ 1782378015637897216
author Volpov, Beth L.
Hoskins, Andrew J.
Battaile, Brian C.
Viviant, Morgane
Wheatley, Kathryn E.
Marshall, Greg
Abernathy, Kyler
Arnould, John P. Y.
author_facet Volpov, Beth L.
Hoskins, Andrew J.
Battaile, Brian C.
Viviant, Morgane
Wheatley, Kathryn E.
Marshall, Greg
Abernathy, Kyler
Arnould, John P. Y.
author_sort Volpov, Beth L.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated prey captures in free-ranging adult female Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) using head-mounted 3-axis accelerometers and animal-borne video cameras. Acceleration data was used to identify individual attempted prey captures (APC), and video data were used to independently verify APC and prey types. Results demonstrated that head-mounted accelerometers could detect individual APC but were unable to distinguish among prey types (fish, cephalopod, stingray) or between successful captures and unsuccessful capture attempts. Mean detection rate (true positive rate) on individual animals in the testing subset ranged from 67-100%, and mean detection on the testing subset averaged across 4 animals ranged from 82-97%. Mean False positive (FP) rate ranged from 15-67% individually in the testing subset, and 26-59% averaged across 4 animals. Surge and sway had significantly greater detection rates, but also conversely greater FP rates compared to heave. Video data also indicated that some head movements recorded by the accelerometers were unrelated to APC and that a peak in acceleration variance did not always equate to an individual prey item. The results of the present study indicate that head-mounted accelerometers provide a complementary tool for investigating foraging behaviour in pinnipeds, but that detection and FP correction factors need to be applied for reliable field application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4479472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44794722015-06-29 Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras Volpov, Beth L. Hoskins, Andrew J. Battaile, Brian C. Viviant, Morgane Wheatley, Kathryn E. Marshall, Greg Abernathy, Kyler Arnould, John P. Y. PLoS One Research Article This study investigated prey captures in free-ranging adult female Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) using head-mounted 3-axis accelerometers and animal-borne video cameras. Acceleration data was used to identify individual attempted prey captures (APC), and video data were used to independently verify APC and prey types. Results demonstrated that head-mounted accelerometers could detect individual APC but were unable to distinguish among prey types (fish, cephalopod, stingray) or between successful captures and unsuccessful capture attempts. Mean detection rate (true positive rate) on individual animals in the testing subset ranged from 67-100%, and mean detection on the testing subset averaged across 4 animals ranged from 82-97%. Mean False positive (FP) rate ranged from 15-67% individually in the testing subset, and 26-59% averaged across 4 animals. Surge and sway had significantly greater detection rates, but also conversely greater FP rates compared to heave. Video data also indicated that some head movements recorded by the accelerometers were unrelated to APC and that a peak in acceleration variance did not always equate to an individual prey item. The results of the present study indicate that head-mounted accelerometers provide a complementary tool for investigating foraging behaviour in pinnipeds, but that detection and FP correction factors need to be applied for reliable field application. Public Library of Science 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4479472/ /pubmed/26107647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128789 Text en © 2015 Volpov et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Volpov, Beth L.
Hoskins, Andrew J.
Battaile, Brian C.
Viviant, Morgane
Wheatley, Kathryn E.
Marshall, Greg
Abernathy, Kyler
Arnould, John P. Y.
Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras
title Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras
title_full Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras
title_fullStr Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras
title_short Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras
title_sort identification of prey captures in australian fur seals (arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) using head-mounted accelerometers: field validation with animal-borne video cameras
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26107647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128789
work_keys_str_mv AT volpovbethl identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT hoskinsandrewj identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT battailebrianc identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT viviantmorgane identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT wheatleykathryne identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT marshallgreg identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT abernathykyler identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras
AT arnouldjohnpy identificationofpreycapturesinaustralianfursealsarctocephaluspusillusdoriferususingheadmountedaccelerometersfieldvalidationwithanimalbornevideocameras