Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent

BACKGROUND: Higher reperfusion rates have been established with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients. There are limited data on the comparative performance of mechanical thrombectomy devices. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of the stent retriever device (Soli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Jae-Hyung, Park, Hyun-Seok, Kim, Dae-Hyun, Cha, Jae-Kwan, Huh, Jae-Taeck, Kang, Myongjin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26113961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.5.342
_version_ 1782378046515314688
author Choi, Jae-Hyung
Park, Hyun-Seok
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Cha, Jae-Kwan
Huh, Jae-Taeck
Kang, Myongjin
author_facet Choi, Jae-Hyung
Park, Hyun-Seok
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Cha, Jae-Kwan
Huh, Jae-Taeck
Kang, Myongjin
author_sort Choi, Jae-Hyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Higher reperfusion rates have been established with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients. There are limited data on the comparative performance of mechanical thrombectomy devices. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of the stent retriever device (Solitaire stent) by comparing procedure time, angiographic outcome, complication rate and long term clinical outcome with previous chemical thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy using penumbra system. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent chemical thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy using Penumbra or Solitaire stent retriever from March 2009 to March 2014. Baseline characteristics, rate of successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, procedure time, mortality and independent functional outcomes (mRS ≤2) at 3 month were compared across the three method. RESULTS: Our cohort included 164 patients, mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever device had a significant impact on recanalization rate and functional independence at 3 months. In unadjusted analysis mechanical thrombectomy using Solitaire stent retriever showed higher recanalization rate than Penumbra system and chemical thrombolysis (75% vs. 64.2% vs. 49.4%, p=0.03) and higher rate of functional independence at 3 month (53.1% vs. 37.7% vs. 35.4%, p=0.213). In view of the interrelationships between all predictors of variables associated with a good clinical outcome, when the chemical thrombolysis was used as a reference, in multiple logistic regression analysis, the use of Solitaire stent retriever showed higher odds of independent functional outcome [odds ratio (OR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-7.17; p=0.061] in comparison with penumbra system (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.63-3.90; p=0.331). CONCLUSION: Our initial data suggest that mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever is superior to the mechanical thrombectomy using penumbra system and conventional chemical thrombolysis in achieving higher rates of reperfusion and better outcomes. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the actual benefit to specific patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4479715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44797152015-06-25 Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent Choi, Jae-Hyung Park, Hyun-Seok Kim, Dae-Hyun Cha, Jae-Kwan Huh, Jae-Taeck Kang, Myongjin J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article BACKGROUND: Higher reperfusion rates have been established with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients. There are limited data on the comparative performance of mechanical thrombectomy devices. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of the stent retriever device (Solitaire stent) by comparing procedure time, angiographic outcome, complication rate and long term clinical outcome with previous chemical thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy using penumbra system. METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent chemical thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy using Penumbra or Solitaire stent retriever from March 2009 to March 2014. Baseline characteristics, rate of successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, procedure time, mortality and independent functional outcomes (mRS ≤2) at 3 month were compared across the three method. RESULTS: Our cohort included 164 patients, mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever device had a significant impact on recanalization rate and functional independence at 3 months. In unadjusted analysis mechanical thrombectomy using Solitaire stent retriever showed higher recanalization rate than Penumbra system and chemical thrombolysis (75% vs. 64.2% vs. 49.4%, p=0.03) and higher rate of functional independence at 3 month (53.1% vs. 37.7% vs. 35.4%, p=0.213). In view of the interrelationships between all predictors of variables associated with a good clinical outcome, when the chemical thrombolysis was used as a reference, in multiple logistic regression analysis, the use of Solitaire stent retriever showed higher odds of independent functional outcome [odds ratio (OR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-7.17; p=0.061] in comparison with penumbra system (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.63-3.90; p=0.331). CONCLUSION: Our initial data suggest that mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever is superior to the mechanical thrombectomy using penumbra system and conventional chemical thrombolysis in achieving higher rates of reperfusion and better outcomes. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the actual benefit to specific patient populations. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2015-05 2015-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4479715/ /pubmed/26113961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.5.342 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Choi, Jae-Hyung
Park, Hyun-Seok
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Cha, Jae-Kwan
Huh, Jae-Taeck
Kang, Myongjin
Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent
title Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent
title_full Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent
title_short Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Stroke Therapy Using Urokinase, Penumbra System and Retrievable (Solitare) Stent
title_sort comparative analysis of endovascular stroke therapy using urokinase, penumbra system and retrievable (solitare) stent
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26113961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.5.342
work_keys_str_mv AT choijaehyung comparativeanalysisofendovascularstroketherapyusingurokinasepenumbrasystemandretrievablesolitarestent
AT parkhyunseok comparativeanalysisofendovascularstroketherapyusingurokinasepenumbrasystemandretrievablesolitarestent
AT kimdaehyun comparativeanalysisofendovascularstroketherapyusingurokinasepenumbrasystemandretrievablesolitarestent
AT chajaekwan comparativeanalysisofendovascularstroketherapyusingurokinasepenumbrasystemandretrievablesolitarestent
AT huhjaetaeck comparativeanalysisofendovascularstroketherapyusingurokinasepenumbrasystemandretrievablesolitarestent
AT kangmyongjin comparativeanalysisofendovascularstroketherapyusingurokinasepenumbrasystemandretrievablesolitarestent