Cargando…

A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: The difficulty in obtaining an acceptable impression increases exponentially as the number of abutments increases. Accuracy of the impression material and the use of a suitable impression technique are of utmost importance in the fabrication of a fixed partial denture. This study compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, M Praveen, Patil, Suneel G, Dheeraj, Bhandari, Reddy, Keshav, Goel, Dinker, Krishna, Gopi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124599
_version_ 1782378056566964224
author Kumar, M Praveen
Patil, Suneel G
Dheeraj, Bhandari
Reddy, Keshav
Goel, Dinker
Krishna, Gopi
author_facet Kumar, M Praveen
Patil, Suneel G
Dheeraj, Bhandari
Reddy, Keshav
Goel, Dinker
Krishna, Gopi
author_sort Kumar, M Praveen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The difficulty in obtaining an acceptable impression increases exponentially as the number of abutments increases. Accuracy of the impression material and the use of a suitable impression technique are of utmost importance in the fabrication of a fixed partial denture. This study compared the accuracy of the matrix impression system with conventional putty reline and multiple mix technique for individual dies by comparing the inter-abutment distance in the casts obtained from the impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups, 10 impressions each with three impression techniques (matrix impression system, putty reline technique and multiple mix technique) were made of a master die. Typodont teeth were embedded in a maxillary frasaco model base. The left first premolar was removed to create a three-unit fixed partial denture situation and the left canine and second premolar were prepared conservatively, and hatch marks were made on the abutment teeth. The final casts obtained from the impressions were examined under a profile projector and the inter-abutment distance was calculated for all the casts and compared. RESULTS: The results from this study showed that in the mesiodistal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1 and 0.2, in Group II was 0.9 and 0.3, and Group III was 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. In the labio-palatal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.01 and 0.4, Group II was 1.9 and 1.3, and Group III was 2.2 and 2.0, respectively. In the cervico-incisal dimensions the percentage deviation from the master model in Group I was 1.1 and 0.2, Group II was 3.9 and 1.7, and Group III was 1.9 and 3.0, respectively. In the inter-abutment dimension of dies, percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1, Group II was 0.6, and Group III was 1.0. CONCLUSION: The matrix impression system showed more accuracy of reproduction for individual dies when compared with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique in all the three directions, as well as the inter-abutment distance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4479773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44797732015-08-01 A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study Kumar, M Praveen Patil, Suneel G Dheeraj, Bhandari Reddy, Keshav Goel, Dinker Krishna, Gopi J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The difficulty in obtaining an acceptable impression increases exponentially as the number of abutments increases. Accuracy of the impression material and the use of a suitable impression technique are of utmost importance in the fabrication of a fixed partial denture. This study compared the accuracy of the matrix impression system with conventional putty reline and multiple mix technique for individual dies by comparing the inter-abutment distance in the casts obtained from the impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups, 10 impressions each with three impression techniques (matrix impression system, putty reline technique and multiple mix technique) were made of a master die. Typodont teeth were embedded in a maxillary frasaco model base. The left first premolar was removed to create a three-unit fixed partial denture situation and the left canine and second premolar were prepared conservatively, and hatch marks were made on the abutment teeth. The final casts obtained from the impressions were examined under a profile projector and the inter-abutment distance was calculated for all the casts and compared. RESULTS: The results from this study showed that in the mesiodistal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1 and 0.2, in Group II was 0.9 and 0.3, and Group III was 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. In the labio-palatal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.01 and 0.4, Group II was 1.9 and 1.3, and Group III was 2.2 and 2.0, respectively. In the cervico-incisal dimensions the percentage deviation from the master model in Group I was 1.1 and 0.2, Group II was 3.9 and 1.7, and Group III was 1.9 and 3.0, respectively. In the inter-abutment dimension of dies, percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1, Group II was 0.6, and Group III was 1.0. CONCLUSION: The matrix impression system showed more accuracy of reproduction for individual dies when compared with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique in all the three directions, as well as the inter-abutment distance. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4479773/ /pubmed/26124599 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kumar, M Praveen
Patil, Suneel G
Dheeraj, Bhandari
Reddy, Keshav
Goel, Dinker
Krishna, Gopi
A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
title A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_full A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_short A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparison of accuracy of matrix impression system with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124599
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarmpraveen acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT patilsuneelg acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT dheerajbhandari acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT reddykeshav acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT goeldinker acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT krishnagopi acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT kumarmpraveen comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT patilsuneelg comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT dheerajbhandari comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT reddykeshav comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT goeldinker comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT krishnagopi comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy