Cargando…
A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study
BACKGROUND: The difficulty in obtaining an acceptable impression increases exponentially as the number of abutments increases. Accuracy of the impression material and the use of a suitable impression technique are of utmost importance in the fabrication of a fixed partial denture. This study compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124599 |
_version_ | 1782378056566964224 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, M Praveen Patil, Suneel G Dheeraj, Bhandari Reddy, Keshav Goel, Dinker Krishna, Gopi |
author_facet | Kumar, M Praveen Patil, Suneel G Dheeraj, Bhandari Reddy, Keshav Goel, Dinker Krishna, Gopi |
author_sort | Kumar, M Praveen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The difficulty in obtaining an acceptable impression increases exponentially as the number of abutments increases. Accuracy of the impression material and the use of a suitable impression technique are of utmost importance in the fabrication of a fixed partial denture. This study compared the accuracy of the matrix impression system with conventional putty reline and multiple mix technique for individual dies by comparing the inter-abutment distance in the casts obtained from the impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups, 10 impressions each with three impression techniques (matrix impression system, putty reline technique and multiple mix technique) were made of a master die. Typodont teeth were embedded in a maxillary frasaco model base. The left first premolar was removed to create a three-unit fixed partial denture situation and the left canine and second premolar were prepared conservatively, and hatch marks were made on the abutment teeth. The final casts obtained from the impressions were examined under a profile projector and the inter-abutment distance was calculated for all the casts and compared. RESULTS: The results from this study showed that in the mesiodistal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1 and 0.2, in Group II was 0.9 and 0.3, and Group III was 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. In the labio-palatal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.01 and 0.4, Group II was 1.9 and 1.3, and Group III was 2.2 and 2.0, respectively. In the cervico-incisal dimensions the percentage deviation from the master model in Group I was 1.1 and 0.2, Group II was 3.9 and 1.7, and Group III was 1.9 and 3.0, respectively. In the inter-abutment dimension of dies, percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1, Group II was 0.6, and Group III was 1.0. CONCLUSION: The matrix impression system showed more accuracy of reproduction for individual dies when compared with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique in all the three directions, as well as the inter-abutment distance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4479773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44797732015-08-01 A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study Kumar, M Praveen Patil, Suneel G Dheeraj, Bhandari Reddy, Keshav Goel, Dinker Krishna, Gopi J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The difficulty in obtaining an acceptable impression increases exponentially as the number of abutments increases. Accuracy of the impression material and the use of a suitable impression technique are of utmost importance in the fabrication of a fixed partial denture. This study compared the accuracy of the matrix impression system with conventional putty reline and multiple mix technique for individual dies by comparing the inter-abutment distance in the casts obtained from the impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups, 10 impressions each with three impression techniques (matrix impression system, putty reline technique and multiple mix technique) were made of a master die. Typodont teeth were embedded in a maxillary frasaco model base. The left first premolar was removed to create a three-unit fixed partial denture situation and the left canine and second premolar were prepared conservatively, and hatch marks were made on the abutment teeth. The final casts obtained from the impressions were examined under a profile projector and the inter-abutment distance was calculated for all the casts and compared. RESULTS: The results from this study showed that in the mesiodistal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1 and 0.2, in Group II was 0.9 and 0.3, and Group III was 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. In the labio-palatal dimensions the percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.01 and 0.4, Group II was 1.9 and 1.3, and Group III was 2.2 and 2.0, respectively. In the cervico-incisal dimensions the percentage deviation from the master model in Group I was 1.1 and 0.2, Group II was 3.9 and 1.7, and Group III was 1.9 and 3.0, respectively. In the inter-abutment dimension of dies, percentage deviation from master model in Group I was 0.1, Group II was 0.6, and Group III was 1.0. CONCLUSION: The matrix impression system showed more accuracy of reproduction for individual dies when compared with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique in all the three directions, as well as the inter-abutment distance. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4479773/ /pubmed/26124599 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kumar, M Praveen Patil, Suneel G Dheeraj, Bhandari Reddy, Keshav Goel, Dinker Krishna, Gopi A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study |
title | A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | A Comparison of Accuracy of Matrix Impression System with Putty Reline Technique and Multiple Mix Technique: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of accuracy of matrix impression system with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarmpraveen acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT patilsuneelg acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT dheerajbhandari acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT reddykeshav acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT goeldinker acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT krishnagopi acomparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT kumarmpraveen comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT patilsuneelg comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT dheerajbhandari comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT reddykeshav comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT goeldinker comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy AT krishnagopi comparisonofaccuracyofmatriximpressionsystemwithputtyrelinetechniqueandmultiplemixtechniqueaninvitrostudy |