Cargando…

Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of contrast enhanced F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-contrast enhanced CT [CECT]) when used as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO). M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Avani, Srivastava, Madhur Kumar, Pawaskar, Alok Suresh, Shelley, Simon, Elangovan, Indirani, Jain, Hasmukh, Pandey, Somnath, Kalal, Shilpa, Amalachandran, Jaykanth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170563
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.158529
_version_ 1782378087744274432
author Jain, Avani
Srivastava, Madhur Kumar
Pawaskar, Alok Suresh
Shelley, Simon
Elangovan, Indirani
Jain, Hasmukh
Pandey, Somnath
Kalal, Shilpa
Amalachandran, Jaykanth
author_facet Jain, Avani
Srivastava, Madhur Kumar
Pawaskar, Alok Suresh
Shelley, Simon
Elangovan, Indirani
Jain, Hasmukh
Pandey, Somnath
Kalal, Shilpa
Amalachandran, Jaykanth
author_sort Jain, Avani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of contrast enhanced F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-contrast enhanced CT [CECT]) when used as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy proven MUO were included in this prospective study. Patients who were thoroughly evaluated for primary or primary tumor was detected by any other investigation were excluded from the analysis. Totally, 163 patients with pathological diagnosis of malignancy but no apparent sites of the primary tumor were finally selected for analysis. The site of probable primary malignancy suggested by PET-CECT was confirmed by biopsy/follow-up. RESULTS: PET-CECT suggested probable site of primary in 128/163 (78.52%) patients. In 30/35 remaining patients, primary tumor was not detected even after extensive work-up. In 5 patients, where PET-CECT was negative, primary was found on further extensive investigations or follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the study were 95.76%, 66.67%, 88.28% and 85.71% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: F-18 FDG PET-CECT aptly serves the purpose of initial imaging modality owing to high sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value. PET-CECT not only surveys the whole body for the primary malignancy but also stages the disease accurately. Use of contrast improves the diagnostic utility of modality as well as help in staging of the primary tumor. Although benefits of using PET-CECT as initial diagnostic modality are obvious from this study, there is a need for a larger study comparing conventional methods for diagnosing primary in patients with MUO versus PET-CECT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4479909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44799092015-07-13 Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin Jain, Avani Srivastava, Madhur Kumar Pawaskar, Alok Suresh Shelley, Simon Elangovan, Indirani Jain, Hasmukh Pandey, Somnath Kalal, Shilpa Amalachandran, Jaykanth Indian J Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of contrast enhanced F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-contrast enhanced CT [CECT]) when used as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy proven MUO were included in this prospective study. Patients who were thoroughly evaluated for primary or primary tumor was detected by any other investigation were excluded from the analysis. Totally, 163 patients with pathological diagnosis of malignancy but no apparent sites of the primary tumor were finally selected for analysis. The site of probable primary malignancy suggested by PET-CECT was confirmed by biopsy/follow-up. RESULTS: PET-CECT suggested probable site of primary in 128/163 (78.52%) patients. In 30/35 remaining patients, primary tumor was not detected even after extensive work-up. In 5 patients, where PET-CECT was negative, primary was found on further extensive investigations or follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the study were 95.76%, 66.67%, 88.28% and 85.71% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: F-18 FDG PET-CECT aptly serves the purpose of initial imaging modality owing to high sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value. PET-CECT not only surveys the whole body for the primary malignancy but also stages the disease accurately. Use of contrast improves the diagnostic utility of modality as well as help in staging of the primary tumor. Although benefits of using PET-CECT as initial diagnostic modality are obvious from this study, there is a need for a larger study comparing conventional methods for diagnosing primary in patients with MUO versus PET-CECT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4479909/ /pubmed/26170563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.158529 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Avani
Srivastava, Madhur Kumar
Pawaskar, Alok Suresh
Shelley, Simon
Elangovan, Indirani
Jain, Hasmukh
Pandey, Somnath
Kalal, Shilpa
Amalachandran, Jaykanth
Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
title Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
title_full Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
title_fullStr Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
title_full_unstemmed Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
title_short Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
title_sort contrast-enhanced [18f] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170563
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.158529
work_keys_str_mv AT jainavani contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT srivastavamadhurkumar contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT pawaskaraloksuresh contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT shelleysimon contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT elangovanindirani contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT jainhasmukh contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT pandeysomnath contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT kalalshilpa contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin
AT amalachandranjaykanth contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin