Cargando…
Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of contrast enhanced F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-contrast enhanced CT [CECT]) when used as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO). M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.158529 |
_version_ | 1782378087744274432 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Avani Srivastava, Madhur Kumar Pawaskar, Alok Suresh Shelley, Simon Elangovan, Indirani Jain, Hasmukh Pandey, Somnath Kalal, Shilpa Amalachandran, Jaykanth |
author_facet | Jain, Avani Srivastava, Madhur Kumar Pawaskar, Alok Suresh Shelley, Simon Elangovan, Indirani Jain, Hasmukh Pandey, Somnath Kalal, Shilpa Amalachandran, Jaykanth |
author_sort | Jain, Avani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of contrast enhanced F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-contrast enhanced CT [CECT]) when used as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy proven MUO were included in this prospective study. Patients who were thoroughly evaluated for primary or primary tumor was detected by any other investigation were excluded from the analysis. Totally, 163 patients with pathological diagnosis of malignancy but no apparent sites of the primary tumor were finally selected for analysis. The site of probable primary malignancy suggested by PET-CECT was confirmed by biopsy/follow-up. RESULTS: PET-CECT suggested probable site of primary in 128/163 (78.52%) patients. In 30/35 remaining patients, primary tumor was not detected even after extensive work-up. In 5 patients, where PET-CECT was negative, primary was found on further extensive investigations or follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the study were 95.76%, 66.67%, 88.28% and 85.71% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: F-18 FDG PET-CECT aptly serves the purpose of initial imaging modality owing to high sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value. PET-CECT not only surveys the whole body for the primary malignancy but also stages the disease accurately. Use of contrast improves the diagnostic utility of modality as well as help in staging of the primary tumor. Although benefits of using PET-CECT as initial diagnostic modality are obvious from this study, there is a need for a larger study comparing conventional methods for diagnosing primary in patients with MUO versus PET-CECT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4479909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44799092015-07-13 Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin Jain, Avani Srivastava, Madhur Kumar Pawaskar, Alok Suresh Shelley, Simon Elangovan, Indirani Jain, Hasmukh Pandey, Somnath Kalal, Shilpa Amalachandran, Jaykanth Indian J Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages of contrast enhanced F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-contrast enhanced CT [CECT]) when used as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with fine needle aspiration cytology/biopsy proven MUO were included in this prospective study. Patients who were thoroughly evaluated for primary or primary tumor was detected by any other investigation were excluded from the analysis. Totally, 163 patients with pathological diagnosis of malignancy but no apparent sites of the primary tumor were finally selected for analysis. The site of probable primary malignancy suggested by PET-CECT was confirmed by biopsy/follow-up. RESULTS: PET-CECT suggested probable site of primary in 128/163 (78.52%) patients. In 30/35 remaining patients, primary tumor was not detected even after extensive work-up. In 5 patients, where PET-CECT was negative, primary was found on further extensive investigations or follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the study were 95.76%, 66.67%, 88.28% and 85.71% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: F-18 FDG PET-CECT aptly serves the purpose of initial imaging modality owing to high sensitivity, negative and positive predictive value. PET-CECT not only surveys the whole body for the primary malignancy but also stages the disease accurately. Use of contrast improves the diagnostic utility of modality as well as help in staging of the primary tumor. Although benefits of using PET-CECT as initial diagnostic modality are obvious from this study, there is a need for a larger study comparing conventional methods for diagnosing primary in patients with MUO versus PET-CECT. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4479909/ /pubmed/26170563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.158529 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jain, Avani Srivastava, Madhur Kumar Pawaskar, Alok Suresh Shelley, Simon Elangovan, Indirani Jain, Hasmukh Pandey, Somnath Kalal, Shilpa Amalachandran, Jaykanth Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
title | Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
title_full | Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
title_fullStr | Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
title_short | Contrast-enhanced [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
title_sort | contrast-enhanced [18f] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography as an initial imaging modality in patients presenting with metastatic malignancy of undefined primary origin |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4479909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170563 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.158529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jainavani contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT srivastavamadhurkumar contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT pawaskaraloksuresh contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT shelleysimon contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT elangovanindirani contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT jainhasmukh contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT pandeysomnath contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT kalalshilpa contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin AT amalachandranjaykanth contrastenhanced18ffluorodeoxyglucosepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyasaninitialimagingmodalityinpatientspresentingwithmetastaticmalignancyofundefinedprimaryorigin |