Cargando…
Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
Humans’ and apes’ convergent (front-facing) orbits allow a large overlap of monocular visual fields but are considered to limit the lateral visual field extent. However, humans can greatly expand their lateral visual fields using eye motion. This study aimed to assess whether the human orbital morph...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11528 |
_version_ | 1782378116336844800 |
---|---|
author | Denion, Eric Hitier, Martin Guyader, Vincent Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle Mouriaux, Frédéric |
author_facet | Denion, Eric Hitier, Martin Guyader, Vincent Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle Mouriaux, Frédéric |
author_sort | Denion, Eric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Humans’ and apes’ convergent (front-facing) orbits allow a large overlap of monocular visual fields but are considered to limit the lateral visual field extent. However, humans can greatly expand their lateral visual fields using eye motion. This study aimed to assess whether the human orbital morphology was unique compared with that of apes in avoiding lateral visual field obstruction. The orbits of 100 human skulls and 120 ape skulls (30 gibbons; 30 orangutans; 30 gorillas; 30 chimpanzees and bonobos) were analyzed. The orbital width/height ratio was calculated. Two orbital angles representing orbital convergence and rearward position of the orbital margin respectively were recorded using a protractor and laser levels. Humans have the largest orbital width/height ratio (1.19; p < 0.001). Humans and gibbons have orbits which are significantly less convergent than those of chimpanzees / bonobos, gorillas and orangutans (p < 0.001). These elements suggest a morphology favoring lateral vision in humans. More specifically, the human orbit has a uniquely rearward temporal orbital margin (107.1°; p < 0.001), suitable for avoiding visual obstruction and promoting lateral visual field expansion through eye motion. Such an orbital morphology may have evolved mainly as an adaptation to open-country habitat and bipedal locomotion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4480145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44801452015-06-29 Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes Denion, Eric Hitier, Martin Guyader, Vincent Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle Mouriaux, Frédéric Sci Rep Article Humans’ and apes’ convergent (front-facing) orbits allow a large overlap of monocular visual fields but are considered to limit the lateral visual field extent. However, humans can greatly expand their lateral visual fields using eye motion. This study aimed to assess whether the human orbital morphology was unique compared with that of apes in avoiding lateral visual field obstruction. The orbits of 100 human skulls and 120 ape skulls (30 gibbons; 30 orangutans; 30 gorillas; 30 chimpanzees and bonobos) were analyzed. The orbital width/height ratio was calculated. Two orbital angles representing orbital convergence and rearward position of the orbital margin respectively were recorded using a protractor and laser levels. Humans have the largest orbital width/height ratio (1.19; p < 0.001). Humans and gibbons have orbits which are significantly less convergent than those of chimpanzees / bonobos, gorillas and orangutans (p < 0.001). These elements suggest a morphology favoring lateral vision in humans. More specifically, the human orbit has a uniquely rearward temporal orbital margin (107.1°; p < 0.001), suitable for avoiding visual obstruction and promoting lateral visual field expansion through eye motion. Such an orbital morphology may have evolved mainly as an adaptation to open-country habitat and bipedal locomotion. Nature Publishing Group 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4480145/ /pubmed/26111067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11528 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Denion, Eric Hitier, Martin Guyader, Vincent Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle Mouriaux, Frédéric Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
title | Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
title_full | Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
title_fullStr | Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
title_full_unstemmed | Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
title_short | Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
title_sort | unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denioneric uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes AT hitiermartin uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes AT guyadervincent uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes AT dugueaudreyemmanuelle uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes AT mouriauxfrederic uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes |