Cargando…

Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes

Humans’ and apes’ convergent (front-facing) orbits allow a large overlap of monocular visual fields but are considered to limit the lateral visual field extent. However, humans can greatly expand their lateral visual fields using eye motion. This study aimed to assess whether the human orbital morph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denion, Eric, Hitier, Martin, Guyader, Vincent, Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle, Mouriaux, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11528
_version_ 1782378116336844800
author Denion, Eric
Hitier, Martin
Guyader, Vincent
Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle
Mouriaux, Frédéric
author_facet Denion, Eric
Hitier, Martin
Guyader, Vincent
Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle
Mouriaux, Frédéric
author_sort Denion, Eric
collection PubMed
description Humans’ and apes’ convergent (front-facing) orbits allow a large overlap of monocular visual fields but are considered to limit the lateral visual field extent. However, humans can greatly expand their lateral visual fields using eye motion. This study aimed to assess whether the human orbital morphology was unique compared with that of apes in avoiding lateral visual field obstruction. The orbits of 100 human skulls and 120 ape skulls (30 gibbons; 30 orangutans; 30 gorillas; 30 chimpanzees and bonobos) were analyzed. The orbital width/height ratio was calculated. Two orbital angles representing orbital convergence and rearward position of the orbital margin respectively were recorded using a protractor and laser levels. Humans have the largest orbital width/height ratio (1.19; p < 0.001). Humans and gibbons have orbits which are significantly less convergent than those of chimpanzees / bonobos, gorillas and orangutans (p < 0.001). These elements suggest a morphology favoring lateral vision in humans. More specifically, the human orbit has a uniquely rearward temporal orbital margin (107.1°; p < 0.001), suitable for avoiding visual obstruction and promoting lateral visual field expansion through eye motion. Such an orbital morphology may have evolved mainly as an adaptation to open-country habitat and bipedal locomotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4480145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44801452015-06-29 Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes Denion, Eric Hitier, Martin Guyader, Vincent Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle Mouriaux, Frédéric Sci Rep Article Humans’ and apes’ convergent (front-facing) orbits allow a large overlap of monocular visual fields but are considered to limit the lateral visual field extent. However, humans can greatly expand their lateral visual fields using eye motion. This study aimed to assess whether the human orbital morphology was unique compared with that of apes in avoiding lateral visual field obstruction. The orbits of 100 human skulls and 120 ape skulls (30 gibbons; 30 orangutans; 30 gorillas; 30 chimpanzees and bonobos) were analyzed. The orbital width/height ratio was calculated. Two orbital angles representing orbital convergence and rearward position of the orbital margin respectively were recorded using a protractor and laser levels. Humans have the largest orbital width/height ratio (1.19; p < 0.001). Humans and gibbons have orbits which are significantly less convergent than those of chimpanzees / bonobos, gorillas and orangutans (p < 0.001). These elements suggest a morphology favoring lateral vision in humans. More specifically, the human orbit has a uniquely rearward temporal orbital margin (107.1°; p < 0.001), suitable for avoiding visual obstruction and promoting lateral visual field expansion through eye motion. Such an orbital morphology may have evolved mainly as an adaptation to open-country habitat and bipedal locomotion. Nature Publishing Group 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4480145/ /pubmed/26111067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11528 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Denion, Eric
Hitier, Martin
Guyader, Vincent
Dugué, Audrey-Emmanuelle
Mouriaux, Frédéric
Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
title Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
title_full Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
title_fullStr Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
title_full_unstemmed Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
title_short Unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
title_sort unique human orbital morphology compared with that of apes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11528
work_keys_str_mv AT denioneric uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes
AT hitiermartin uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes
AT guyadervincent uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes
AT dugueaudreyemmanuelle uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes
AT mouriauxfrederic uniquehumanorbitalmorphologycomparedwiththatofapes