Cargando…
Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
PURPOSE: Our study aims to evaluate to evaluate clinical outcomes after cephalic vein transposition (CVT) to the axilla in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF) and cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 13 patients (median age, 61 years; male...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Vascular Specialist International
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.2.62 |
_version_ | 1782378139174830080 |
---|---|
author | Jang, Jihoon Jung, Heekyung Cho, Jayun Kim, Jihye Kim, Hyung-Kee Huh, Seung |
author_facet | Jang, Jihoon Jung, Heekyung Cho, Jayun Kim, Jihye Kim, Hyung-Kee Huh, Seung |
author_sort | Jang, Jihoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Our study aims to evaluate to evaluate clinical outcomes after cephalic vein transposition (CVT) to the axilla in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF) and cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 13 patients (median age, 61 years; males, 54%) who received CVT to the proximal basilic/axillary vein due to either dysfunction (n=2) or thrombosis (n=11) between January 2010 and February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Operation was performed under local anesthesia in all cases. There was no technical failure. Concomitant inflow procedure (banding or aneurysmorrhaphy) was performed in 5 patients (38%). During follow-up (1 to 50 months, median 17 months), 3 patients died with functioning AVF and one was successfully transplanted. Two patients suffered from recurrent symptomatic stenosis of AVF and received percutaneous balloon angioplasty. Another 2 patients experienced AVF occlusion treated with interposition graft and manual fragmentation. Overall primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 92.3%, and 100% at 6 months and 66.1%, 92.3%, and 100% at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although most patients presented with BC-AVF occlusion, technical success and access patency rates after CVT were favorable compared with historical data for interventional treatment. CVT should be considered as an appropriate option in selected patients with CAS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4480308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Vascular Specialist International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44803082015-07-27 Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis Jang, Jihoon Jung, Heekyung Cho, Jayun Kim, Jihye Kim, Hyung-Kee Huh, Seung Vasc Specialist Int Original Article PURPOSE: Our study aims to evaluate to evaluate clinical outcomes after cephalic vein transposition (CVT) to the axilla in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF) and cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 13 patients (median age, 61 years; males, 54%) who received CVT to the proximal basilic/axillary vein due to either dysfunction (n=2) or thrombosis (n=11) between January 2010 and February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Operation was performed under local anesthesia in all cases. There was no technical failure. Concomitant inflow procedure (banding or aneurysmorrhaphy) was performed in 5 patients (38%). During follow-up (1 to 50 months, median 17 months), 3 patients died with functioning AVF and one was successfully transplanted. Two patients suffered from recurrent symptomatic stenosis of AVF and received percutaneous balloon angioplasty. Another 2 patients experienced AVF occlusion treated with interposition graft and manual fragmentation. Overall primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 92.3%, and 100% at 6 months and 66.1%, 92.3%, and 100% at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although most patients presented with BC-AVF occlusion, technical success and access patency rates after CVT were favorable compared with historical data for interventional treatment. CVT should be considered as an appropriate option in selected patients with CAS. Vascular Specialist International 2014-06 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4480308/ /pubmed/26217618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.2.62 Text en Copyright © 2014, The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jang, Jihoon Jung, Heekyung Cho, Jayun Kim, Jihye Kim, Hyung-Kee Huh, Seung Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis |
title | Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis |
title_full | Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis |
title_fullStr | Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis |
title_short | Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis |
title_sort | central transposition of the cephalic vein in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula and cephalic arch stenosis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.2.62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jangjihoon centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis AT jungheekyung centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis AT chojayun centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis AT kimjihye centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis AT kimhyungkee centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis AT huhseung centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis |