Cargando…

Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis

PURPOSE: Our study aims to evaluate to evaluate clinical outcomes after cephalic vein transposition (CVT) to the axilla in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF) and cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 13 patients (median age, 61 years; male...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Jihoon, Jung, Heekyung, Cho, Jayun, Kim, Jihye, Kim, Hyung-Kee, Huh, Seung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Vascular Specialist International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217618
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.2.62
_version_ 1782378139174830080
author Jang, Jihoon
Jung, Heekyung
Cho, Jayun
Kim, Jihye
Kim, Hyung-Kee
Huh, Seung
author_facet Jang, Jihoon
Jung, Heekyung
Cho, Jayun
Kim, Jihye
Kim, Hyung-Kee
Huh, Seung
author_sort Jang, Jihoon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Our study aims to evaluate to evaluate clinical outcomes after cephalic vein transposition (CVT) to the axilla in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF) and cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 13 patients (median age, 61 years; males, 54%) who received CVT to the proximal basilic/axillary vein due to either dysfunction (n=2) or thrombosis (n=11) between January 2010 and February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Operation was performed under local anesthesia in all cases. There was no technical failure. Concomitant inflow procedure (banding or aneurysmorrhaphy) was performed in 5 patients (38%). During follow-up (1 to 50 months, median 17 months), 3 patients died with functioning AVF and one was successfully transplanted. Two patients suffered from recurrent symptomatic stenosis of AVF and received percutaneous balloon angioplasty. Another 2 patients experienced AVF occlusion treated with interposition graft and manual fragmentation. Overall primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 92.3%, and 100% at 6 months and 66.1%, 92.3%, and 100% at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although most patients presented with BC-AVF occlusion, technical success and access patency rates after CVT were favorable compared with historical data for interventional treatment. CVT should be considered as an appropriate option in selected patients with CAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4480308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Vascular Specialist International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44803082015-07-27 Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis Jang, Jihoon Jung, Heekyung Cho, Jayun Kim, Jihye Kim, Hyung-Kee Huh, Seung Vasc Specialist Int Original Article PURPOSE: Our study aims to evaluate to evaluate clinical outcomes after cephalic vein transposition (CVT) to the axilla in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (BC-AVF) and cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital records of 13 patients (median age, 61 years; males, 54%) who received CVT to the proximal basilic/axillary vein due to either dysfunction (n=2) or thrombosis (n=11) between January 2010 and February 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Operation was performed under local anesthesia in all cases. There was no technical failure. Concomitant inflow procedure (banding or aneurysmorrhaphy) was performed in 5 patients (38%). During follow-up (1 to 50 months, median 17 months), 3 patients died with functioning AVF and one was successfully transplanted. Two patients suffered from recurrent symptomatic stenosis of AVF and received percutaneous balloon angioplasty. Another 2 patients experienced AVF occlusion treated with interposition graft and manual fragmentation. Overall primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 77.5%, 92.3%, and 100% at 6 months and 66.1%, 92.3%, and 100% at 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although most patients presented with BC-AVF occlusion, technical success and access patency rates after CVT were favorable compared with historical data for interventional treatment. CVT should be considered as an appropriate option in selected patients with CAS. Vascular Specialist International 2014-06 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4480308/ /pubmed/26217618 http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.2.62 Text en Copyright © 2014, The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jang, Jihoon
Jung, Heekyung
Cho, Jayun
Kim, Jihye
Kim, Hyung-Kee
Huh, Seung
Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
title Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
title_full Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
title_fullStr Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
title_short Central Transposition of the Cephalic Vein in Patients with Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula and Cephalic Arch Stenosis
title_sort central transposition of the cephalic vein in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula and cephalic arch stenosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26217618
http://dx.doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2014.30.2.62
work_keys_str_mv AT jangjihoon centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis
AT jungheekyung centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis
AT chojayun centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis
AT kimjihye centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis
AT kimhyungkee centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis
AT huhseung centraltranspositionofthecephalicveininpatientswithbrachiocephalicarteriovenousfistulaandcephalicarchstenosis