Cargando…

Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching

Cognitive control is required in situations that involve uncertainty or change, such as when resolving conflict, selecting responses and switching tasks. Recently, it has been suggested that cognitive control can be conceptualised as a mechanism which prioritises goal-relevant information to deal wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Patrick S., Garrett, Paul M., Rennie, Jaime L., Karayanidis, Frini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26107646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131556
_version_ 1782378149148884992
author Cooper, Patrick S.
Garrett, Paul M.
Rennie, Jaime L.
Karayanidis, Frini
author_facet Cooper, Patrick S.
Garrett, Paul M.
Rennie, Jaime L.
Karayanidis, Frini
author_sort Cooper, Patrick S.
collection PubMed
description Cognitive control is required in situations that involve uncertainty or change, such as when resolving conflict, selecting responses and switching tasks. Recently, it has been suggested that cognitive control can be conceptualised as a mechanism which prioritises goal-relevant information to deal with uncertainty. This hypothesis has been supported using a paradigm that requires conflict resolution. In this study, we examine whether cognitive control during task switching is also consistent with this notion. We used information theory to quantify the level of uncertainty in different trial types during a cued task-switching paradigm. We test the hypothesis that differences in uncertainty between task repeat and task switch trials can account for typical behavioural effects in task-switching. Increasing uncertainty was associated with less efficient performance (i.e., slower and less accurate), particularly on switch trials and trials that afford little opportunity for advance preparation. Interestingly, both mixing and switch costs were associated with a common episodic control process. These results support the notion that cognitive control may be conceptualised as an information processor that serves to resolve uncertainty in the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4480360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44803602015-06-29 Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching Cooper, Patrick S. Garrett, Paul M. Rennie, Jaime L. Karayanidis, Frini PLoS One Research Article Cognitive control is required in situations that involve uncertainty or change, such as when resolving conflict, selecting responses and switching tasks. Recently, it has been suggested that cognitive control can be conceptualised as a mechanism which prioritises goal-relevant information to deal with uncertainty. This hypothesis has been supported using a paradigm that requires conflict resolution. In this study, we examine whether cognitive control during task switching is also consistent with this notion. We used information theory to quantify the level of uncertainty in different trial types during a cued task-switching paradigm. We test the hypothesis that differences in uncertainty between task repeat and task switch trials can account for typical behavioural effects in task-switching. Increasing uncertainty was associated with less efficient performance (i.e., slower and less accurate), particularly on switch trials and trials that afford little opportunity for advance preparation. Interestingly, both mixing and switch costs were associated with a common episodic control process. These results support the notion that cognitive control may be conceptualised as an information processor that serves to resolve uncertainty in the environment. Public Library of Science 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4480360/ /pubmed/26107646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131556 Text en © 2015 Cooper et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cooper, Patrick S.
Garrett, Paul M.
Rennie, Jaime L.
Karayanidis, Frini
Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_full Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_fullStr Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_full_unstemmed Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_short Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
title_sort task uncertainty can account for mixing and switch costs in task-switching
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26107646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131556
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperpatricks taskuncertaintycanaccountformixingandswitchcostsintaskswitching
AT garrettpaulm taskuncertaintycanaccountformixingandswitchcostsintaskswitching
AT renniejaimel taskuncertaintycanaccountformixingandswitchcostsintaskswitching
AT karayanidisfrini taskuncertaintycanaccountformixingandswitchcostsintaskswitching