Cargando…
Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been steadily increasing in popularity since their introduction to US markets in 2007. Debates surrounding the proper regulatory mechanisms needed to mitigate potential harms associated with their use have focused on youth access, their potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0370-z |
_version_ | 1782378206033084416 |
---|---|
author | Tremblay, Marie-Claude Pluye, Pierre Gore, Genevieve Granikov, Vera Filion, Kristian B. Eisenberg, Mark J. |
author_facet | Tremblay, Marie-Claude Pluye, Pierre Gore, Genevieve Granikov, Vera Filion, Kristian B. Eisenberg, Mark J. |
author_sort | Tremblay, Marie-Claude |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been steadily increasing in popularity since their introduction to US markets in 2007. Debates surrounding the proper regulatory mechanisms needed to mitigate potential harms associated with their use have focused on youth access, their potential for nicotine addiction, and the renormalization of a smoking culture. The objective of this study was to describe the enacted and planned regulations addressing this novel public health concern in the US. METHODS: We searched LexisNexis Academic under Federal Regulations and Registers, as well as State Administrative Codes and Registers. This same database was also used to find information about planned regulations in secondary sources. The search was restricted to US documents produced between January 1(st), 2004, and July 14(th), 2014. RESULTS: We found two planned regulations at the federal level, and 74 enacted and planned regulations in 44 states. We identified six state-based regulation types, including i) access, ii) usage, iii) marketing and advertisement, iv) packaging, v) taxation, and vi) licensure. These were further classified into 10 restriction subtypes: sales, sale to minors, use in indoor public places, use in limited venues, use by minors, licensure, marketing and advertising, packaging, and taxation. Most enacted restrictions aimed primarily to limit youth access, while few regulations enforced comprehensive restrictions on product use and availability. CONCLUSIONS: Current regulations targeting e-cigarettes in the US are varied in nature and scope. There is greater consensus surrounding youth protection (access by minors and/or use by minors, and/or use in limited venues), with little consensus on multi-level regulations, including comprehensive use bans in public spaces. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0370-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4480885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44808852015-06-26 Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis Tremblay, Marie-Claude Pluye, Pierre Gore, Genevieve Granikov, Vera Filion, Kristian B. Eisenberg, Mark J. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been steadily increasing in popularity since their introduction to US markets in 2007. Debates surrounding the proper regulatory mechanisms needed to mitigate potential harms associated with their use have focused on youth access, their potential for nicotine addiction, and the renormalization of a smoking culture. The objective of this study was to describe the enacted and planned regulations addressing this novel public health concern in the US. METHODS: We searched LexisNexis Academic under Federal Regulations and Registers, as well as State Administrative Codes and Registers. This same database was also used to find information about planned regulations in secondary sources. The search was restricted to US documents produced between January 1(st), 2004, and July 14(th), 2014. RESULTS: We found two planned regulations at the federal level, and 74 enacted and planned regulations in 44 states. We identified six state-based regulation types, including i) access, ii) usage, iii) marketing and advertisement, iv) packaging, v) taxation, and vi) licensure. These were further classified into 10 restriction subtypes: sales, sale to minors, use in indoor public places, use in limited venues, use by minors, licensure, marketing and advertising, packaging, and taxation. Most enacted restrictions aimed primarily to limit youth access, while few regulations enforced comprehensive restrictions on product use and availability. CONCLUSIONS: Current regulations targeting e-cigarettes in the US are varied in nature and scope. There is greater consensus surrounding youth protection (access by minors and/or use by minors, and/or use in limited venues), with little consensus on multi-level regulations, including comprehensive use bans in public spaces. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0370-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4480885/ /pubmed/26041672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0370-z Text en © Tremblay et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tremblay, Marie-Claude Pluye, Pierre Gore, Genevieve Granikov, Vera Filion, Kristian B. Eisenberg, Mark J. Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
title | Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
title_full | Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
title_fullStr | Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
title_short | Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
title_sort | regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the united states: a critical review with qualitative synthesis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0370-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tremblaymarieclaude regulationprofilesofecigarettesintheunitedstatesacriticalreviewwithqualitativesynthesis AT pluyepierre regulationprofilesofecigarettesintheunitedstatesacriticalreviewwithqualitativesynthesis AT goregenevieve regulationprofilesofecigarettesintheunitedstatesacriticalreviewwithqualitativesynthesis AT granikovvera regulationprofilesofecigarettesintheunitedstatesacriticalreviewwithqualitativesynthesis AT filionkristianb regulationprofilesofecigarettesintheunitedstatesacriticalreviewwithqualitativesynthesis AT eisenbergmarkj regulationprofilesofecigarettesintheunitedstatesacriticalreviewwithqualitativesynthesis |