Cargando…

Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study

INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) exerts beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in various animal models of inflammation, including collagen-induced arthritis, and is implicated in representing a novel therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. However, evidence of anti-inflammatory effects of VNS in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kox, Matthijs, van Eijk, Lucas T., Verhaak, Tim, Frenzel, Tim, Kiers, Harmke D., Gerretsen, Jelle, van der Hoeven, Johannes G., Kornet, Lilian, Scheiner, Avram, Pickkers, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26049730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0667-5
_version_ 1782378208089341952
author Kox, Matthijs
van Eijk, Lucas T.
Verhaak, Tim
Frenzel, Tim
Kiers, Harmke D.
Gerretsen, Jelle
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
Kornet, Lilian
Scheiner, Avram
Pickkers, Peter
author_facet Kox, Matthijs
van Eijk, Lucas T.
Verhaak, Tim
Frenzel, Tim
Kiers, Harmke D.
Gerretsen, Jelle
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
Kornet, Lilian
Scheiner, Avram
Pickkers, Peter
author_sort Kox, Matthijs
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) exerts beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in various animal models of inflammation, including collagen-induced arthritis, and is implicated in representing a novel therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. However, evidence of anti-inflammatory effects of VNS in humans is very scarce. Transvenous VNS (tVNS) is a newly developed and less invasive method to stimulate the vagus nerve. In the present study, we determined whether tVNS is a feasible and safe procedure and investigated its putative anti-inflammatory effects during experimental human endotoxemia. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study in healthy male volunteers. A stimulation catheter was inserted in the left internal jugular vein at spinal level C5–C7, adjacent to the vagus nerve. In the tVNS group (n = 10), stimulation was continuously performed for 30 minutes (0–10 V, 1 ms, 20 Hz), starting 10 minutes before intravenous administration of 2 ng kg(−1)Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Sham-instrumented subjects (n = 10) received no electrical stimulation. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study. In the tVNS group, stimulation of the vagus nerve was achieved as indicated by laryngeal vibration. Endotoxemia resulted in fever, flu-like symptoms, and hemodynamic changes that were unaffected by tVNS. Furthermore, plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines increased sharply during endotoxemia, but responses were similar between groups. Finally, cytokine production by leukocytes stimulated with LPS ex vivo, as well as neutrophil phagocytosis capacity, were not influenced by tVNS. CONCLUSIONS: tVNS is feasible and safe, but does not modulate the innate immune response in humans in vivo during experimental human endotoxemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01944228. Registered 12 September 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4480894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44808942015-06-26 Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study Kox, Matthijs van Eijk, Lucas T. Verhaak, Tim Frenzel, Tim Kiers, Harmke D. Gerretsen, Jelle van der Hoeven, Johannes G. Kornet, Lilian Scheiner, Avram Pickkers, Peter Arthritis Res Ther Research Article INTRODUCTION: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) exerts beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in various animal models of inflammation, including collagen-induced arthritis, and is implicated in representing a novel therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. However, evidence of anti-inflammatory effects of VNS in humans is very scarce. Transvenous VNS (tVNS) is a newly developed and less invasive method to stimulate the vagus nerve. In the present study, we determined whether tVNS is a feasible and safe procedure and investigated its putative anti-inflammatory effects during experimental human endotoxemia. METHODS: We performed a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study in healthy male volunteers. A stimulation catheter was inserted in the left internal jugular vein at spinal level C5–C7, adjacent to the vagus nerve. In the tVNS group (n = 10), stimulation was continuously performed for 30 minutes (0–10 V, 1 ms, 20 Hz), starting 10 minutes before intravenous administration of 2 ng kg(−1)Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Sham-instrumented subjects (n = 10) received no electrical stimulation. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study. In the tVNS group, stimulation of the vagus nerve was achieved as indicated by laryngeal vibration. Endotoxemia resulted in fever, flu-like symptoms, and hemodynamic changes that were unaffected by tVNS. Furthermore, plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines increased sharply during endotoxemia, but responses were similar between groups. Finally, cytokine production by leukocytes stimulated with LPS ex vivo, as well as neutrophil phagocytosis capacity, were not influenced by tVNS. CONCLUSIONS: tVNS is feasible and safe, but does not modulate the innate immune response in humans in vivo during experimental human endotoxemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01944228. Registered 12 September 2013. BioMed Central 2015-06-07 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4480894/ /pubmed/26049730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0667-5 Text en © Kox et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kox, Matthijs
van Eijk, Lucas T.
Verhaak, Tim
Frenzel, Tim
Kiers, Harmke D.
Gerretsen, Jelle
van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
Kornet, Lilian
Scheiner, Avram
Pickkers, Peter
Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
title Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
title_full Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
title_short Transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
title_sort transvenous vagus nerve stimulation does not modulate the innate immune response during experimental human endotoxemia: a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26049730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0667-5
work_keys_str_mv AT koxmatthijs transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT vaneijklucast transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT verhaaktim transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT frenzeltim transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kiersharmked transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT gerretsenjelle transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT vanderhoevenjohannesg transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kornetlilian transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT scheineravram transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT pickkerspeter transvenousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotmodulatetheinnateimmuneresponseduringexperimentalhumanendotoxemiaarandomizedcontrolledstudy