Cargando…

A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Wenda, Juette, Arne, Denton, Erika R. E., Oliver, Arnau, Martí, Robert, Zwiggelaar, Reyer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217
_version_ 1782378237582639104
author He, Wenda
Juette, Arne
Denton, Erika R. E.
Oliver, Arnau
Martí, Robert
Zwiggelaar, Reyer
author_facet He, Wenda
Juette, Arne
Denton, Erika R. E.
Oliver, Arnau
Martí, Robert
Zwiggelaar, Reyer
author_sort He, Wenda
collection PubMed
description Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast cancer. There are more than 70 common genetic susceptibility factors included in the current non-image-based risk prediction models (e.g., the Gail and the Tyrer-Cuzick models). Image-based risk factors, such as mammographic densities and parenchymal patterns, have been established as biomarkers but have not been fully incorporated in the risk prediction models used for risk stratification in screening and/or measuring responsiveness to preventive approaches. Within computer aided mammography, automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methods have been developed for estimation of breast tissue composition to facilitate mammographic risk assessment. This paper presents a comprehensive review of automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methodologies developed over the past two decades and the evidence for risk assessment/density classification using segmentation. The aim of this review is to analyse how engineering advances have progressed and the impact automatic mammographic tissue segmentation has in a clinical environment, as well as to understand the current research gaps with respect to the incorporation of image-based risk factors in non-image-based risk prediction models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44810862015-07-13 A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation He, Wenda Juette, Arne Denton, Erika R. E. Oliver, Arnau Martí, Robert Zwiggelaar, Reyer Int J Breast Cancer Review Article Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast cancer. There are more than 70 common genetic susceptibility factors included in the current non-image-based risk prediction models (e.g., the Gail and the Tyrer-Cuzick models). Image-based risk factors, such as mammographic densities and parenchymal patterns, have been established as biomarkers but have not been fully incorporated in the risk prediction models used for risk stratification in screening and/or measuring responsiveness to preventive approaches. Within computer aided mammography, automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methods have been developed for estimation of breast tissue composition to facilitate mammographic risk assessment. This paper presents a comprehensive review of automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methodologies developed over the past two decades and the evidence for risk assessment/density classification using segmentation. The aim of this review is to analyse how engineering advances have progressed and the impact automatic mammographic tissue segmentation has in a clinical environment, as well as to understand the current research gaps with respect to the incorporation of image-based risk factors in non-image-based risk prediction models. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4481086/ /pubmed/26171249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wenda He et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
He, Wenda
Juette, Arne
Denton, Erika R. E.
Oliver, Arnau
Martí, Robert
Zwiggelaar, Reyer
A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
title A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
title_full A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
title_fullStr A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
title_full_unstemmed A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
title_short A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
title_sort review on automatic mammographic density and parenchymal segmentation
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217
work_keys_str_mv AT hewenda areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT juettearne areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT dentonerikare areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT oliverarnau areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT martirobert areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT zwiggelaarreyer areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT hewenda reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT juettearne reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT dentonerikare reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT oliverarnau reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT martirobert reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation
AT zwiggelaarreyer reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation