Cargando…
A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217 |
_version_ | 1782378237582639104 |
---|---|
author | He, Wenda Juette, Arne Denton, Erika R. E. Oliver, Arnau Martí, Robert Zwiggelaar, Reyer |
author_facet | He, Wenda Juette, Arne Denton, Erika R. E. Oliver, Arnau Martí, Robert Zwiggelaar, Reyer |
author_sort | He, Wenda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast cancer. There are more than 70 common genetic susceptibility factors included in the current non-image-based risk prediction models (e.g., the Gail and the Tyrer-Cuzick models). Image-based risk factors, such as mammographic densities and parenchymal patterns, have been established as biomarkers but have not been fully incorporated in the risk prediction models used for risk stratification in screening and/or measuring responsiveness to preventive approaches. Within computer aided mammography, automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methods have been developed for estimation of breast tissue composition to facilitate mammographic risk assessment. This paper presents a comprehensive review of automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methodologies developed over the past two decades and the evidence for risk assessment/density classification using segmentation. The aim of this review is to analyse how engineering advances have progressed and the impact automatic mammographic tissue segmentation has in a clinical environment, as well as to understand the current research gaps with respect to the incorporation of image-based risk factors in non-image-based risk prediction models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4481086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44810862015-07-13 A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation He, Wenda Juette, Arne Denton, Erika R. E. Oliver, Arnau Martí, Robert Zwiggelaar, Reyer Int J Breast Cancer Review Article Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast cancer. There are more than 70 common genetic susceptibility factors included in the current non-image-based risk prediction models (e.g., the Gail and the Tyrer-Cuzick models). Image-based risk factors, such as mammographic densities and parenchymal patterns, have been established as biomarkers but have not been fully incorporated in the risk prediction models used for risk stratification in screening and/or measuring responsiveness to preventive approaches. Within computer aided mammography, automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methods have been developed for estimation of breast tissue composition to facilitate mammographic risk assessment. This paper presents a comprehensive review of automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methodologies developed over the past two decades and the evidence for risk assessment/density classification using segmentation. The aim of this review is to analyse how engineering advances have progressed and the impact automatic mammographic tissue segmentation has in a clinical environment, as well as to understand the current research gaps with respect to the incorporation of image-based risk factors in non-image-based risk prediction models. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4481086/ /pubmed/26171249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wenda He et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article He, Wenda Juette, Arne Denton, Erika R. E. Oliver, Arnau Martí, Robert Zwiggelaar, Reyer A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation |
title | A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation |
title_full | A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation |
title_fullStr | A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation |
title_short | A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation |
title_sort | review on automatic mammographic density and parenchymal segmentation |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hewenda areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT juettearne areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT dentonerikare areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT oliverarnau areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT martirobert areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT zwiggelaarreyer areviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT hewenda reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT juettearne reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT dentonerikare reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT oliverarnau reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT martirobert reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation AT zwiggelaarreyer reviewonautomaticmammographicdensityandparenchymalsegmentation |