Cargando…

Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?

Central Africa’s tropical forests are among the world’s largest carbon reserves. Historically, they have experienced low rates of deforestation. Pressures to clear land are increasing due to development of infrastructure and livelihoods, foreign investment in agriculture, and shifting land use manag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galford, Gillian L., Soares-Filho, Britaldo S., Sonter, Laura J., Laporte, Nadine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128473
_version_ 1782378262056402944
author Galford, Gillian L.
Soares-Filho, Britaldo S.
Sonter, Laura J.
Laporte, Nadine
author_facet Galford, Gillian L.
Soares-Filho, Britaldo S.
Sonter, Laura J.
Laporte, Nadine
author_sort Galford, Gillian L.
collection PubMed
description Central Africa’s tropical forests are among the world’s largest carbon reserves. Historically, they have experienced low rates of deforestation. Pressures to clear land are increasing due to development of infrastructure and livelihoods, foreign investment in agriculture, and shifting land use management, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The DRC contains the greatest area of intact African forests. These store approximately 22 billion tons of carbon in aboveground live biomass, yet only 10% are protected. Can the status quo of passive protection — forest management that is low or nonexistent — ensure the preservation of this forest and its carbon? We have developed the SimCongo model to simulate changes in land cover and land use based on theorized policy scenarios from 2010 to 2050. Three scenarios were examined: the first (Historical Trends) assumes passive forest protection; the next (Conservation) posits active protection of forests and activation of the national REDD+ action plan, and the last (Agricultural Development) assumes increased agricultural activities in forested land with concomitant increased deforestation. SimCongo is a cellular automata model based on Bayesian statistical methods tailored for the DRC, built with the Dinamica-EGO platform. The model is parameterized and validated with deforestation observations from the past and runs the scenarios from 2010 through 2050 with a yearly time step. We estimate the Historical Trends trajectory will result in average emissions of 139 million t CO(2) year(-1) by the 2040s, a 15% increase over current emissions. The Conservation scenario would result in 58% less clearing than Historical Trends and would conserve carbon-dense forest and woodland savanna areas. The Agricultural Development scenario leads to emissions of 212 million t CO(2) year(-1) by the 2040s. These scenarios are heuristic examples of policy’s influence on forest conservation and carbon storage. Our results suggest that 1) passive protection of the DRC’s forest and woodland savanna is insufficient to reduce deforestation; and 2): enactment of a REDD+ plan or similar conservation measure is needed to actively protect Congo forests, their unique ecology, and their important role in the global carbon cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44813112015-06-29 Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests? Galford, Gillian L. Soares-Filho, Britaldo S. Sonter, Laura J. Laporte, Nadine PLoS One Research Article Central Africa’s tropical forests are among the world’s largest carbon reserves. Historically, they have experienced low rates of deforestation. Pressures to clear land are increasing due to development of infrastructure and livelihoods, foreign investment in agriculture, and shifting land use management, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The DRC contains the greatest area of intact African forests. These store approximately 22 billion tons of carbon in aboveground live biomass, yet only 10% are protected. Can the status quo of passive protection — forest management that is low or nonexistent — ensure the preservation of this forest and its carbon? We have developed the SimCongo model to simulate changes in land cover and land use based on theorized policy scenarios from 2010 to 2050. Three scenarios were examined: the first (Historical Trends) assumes passive forest protection; the next (Conservation) posits active protection of forests and activation of the national REDD+ action plan, and the last (Agricultural Development) assumes increased agricultural activities in forested land with concomitant increased deforestation. SimCongo is a cellular automata model based on Bayesian statistical methods tailored for the DRC, built with the Dinamica-EGO platform. The model is parameterized and validated with deforestation observations from the past and runs the scenarios from 2010 through 2050 with a yearly time step. We estimate the Historical Trends trajectory will result in average emissions of 139 million t CO(2) year(-1) by the 2040s, a 15% increase over current emissions. The Conservation scenario would result in 58% less clearing than Historical Trends and would conserve carbon-dense forest and woodland savanna areas. The Agricultural Development scenario leads to emissions of 212 million t CO(2) year(-1) by the 2040s. These scenarios are heuristic examples of policy’s influence on forest conservation and carbon storage. Our results suggest that 1) passive protection of the DRC’s forest and woodland savanna is insufficient to reduce deforestation; and 2): enactment of a REDD+ plan or similar conservation measure is needed to actively protect Congo forests, their unique ecology, and their important role in the global carbon cycle. Public Library of Science 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4481311/ /pubmed/26106897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128473 Text en © 2015 Galford et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Galford, Gillian L.
Soares-Filho, Britaldo S.
Sonter, Laura J.
Laporte, Nadine
Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?
title Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?
title_full Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?
title_fullStr Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?
title_full_unstemmed Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?
title_short Will Passive Protection Save Congo Forests?
title_sort will passive protection save congo forests?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128473
work_keys_str_mv AT galfordgillianl willpassiveprotectionsavecongoforests
AT soaresfilhobritaldos willpassiveprotectionsavecongoforests
AT sonterlauraj willpassiveprotectionsavecongoforests
AT laportenadine willpassiveprotectionsavecongoforests