Cargando…

Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?

Illegal hunting (poaching) is a global threat to wildlife. Anti-poaching initiatives are making increasing use of technology, such as infrared thermography (IRT), to support traditional foot and vehicle patrols. To date, the effectiveness of IRT for poacher location has not been tested under field c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Adam G., Rolfe, Richard N., Dandy, Shantelle, Stubbs, Hannah, MacTavish, Dougal, MacTavish, Lynne, Goodenough, Anne E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131584
_version_ 1782378287268364288
author Hart, Adam G.
Rolfe, Richard N.
Dandy, Shantelle
Stubbs, Hannah
MacTavish, Dougal
MacTavish, Lynne
Goodenough, Anne E.
author_facet Hart, Adam G.
Rolfe, Richard N.
Dandy, Shantelle
Stubbs, Hannah
MacTavish, Dougal
MacTavish, Lynne
Goodenough, Anne E.
author_sort Hart, Adam G.
collection PubMed
description Illegal hunting (poaching) is a global threat to wildlife. Anti-poaching initiatives are making increasing use of technology, such as infrared thermography (IRT), to support traditional foot and vehicle patrols. To date, the effectiveness of IRT for poacher location has not been tested under field conditions, where thermal signatures are often complex. Here, we test the hypothesis that IRT will increase the distance over which a poacher hiding in African scrub bushveldt can be detected relative to a conventional flashlight. We also test whether any increase in effectiveness is related to the cost and complexity of the equipment by comparing comparatively expensive (22000 USD) and relatively inexpensive (2000 USD) IRT devices. To test these hypotheses we employ a controlled, fully randomised, double-blind procedure to find a poacher in nocturnal field conditions in African bushveldt. Each of our 27 volunteer observers walked three times along a pathway using one detection technology on each pass in randomised order. They searched a prescribed search area of bushveldt within which the target was hiding. Hiding locations were pre-determined, randomised, and changed with each pass. Distances of first detection and positive detection were noted. All technologies could be used to detect the target. Average first detection distance for flashlight was 37.3m, improving by 19.8m to 57.1m using LIRT and by a further 11.2m to 68.3m using HIRT. Although detection distances were significantly greater for both IRTs compared to flashlight, there was no significant difference between LIRT and HIRT. False detection rates were low and there was no significant association between technology and accuracy of detection. Although IRT technology should ideally be tested in the specific environment intended before significant investment is made, we conclude that IRT technology is promising for anti-poaching patrols and that for this purpose low cost IRT units are as effective as units ten times more expensive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44815162015-07-01 Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt? Hart, Adam G. Rolfe, Richard N. Dandy, Shantelle Stubbs, Hannah MacTavish, Dougal MacTavish, Lynne Goodenough, Anne E. PLoS One Research Article Illegal hunting (poaching) is a global threat to wildlife. Anti-poaching initiatives are making increasing use of technology, such as infrared thermography (IRT), to support traditional foot and vehicle patrols. To date, the effectiveness of IRT for poacher location has not been tested under field conditions, where thermal signatures are often complex. Here, we test the hypothesis that IRT will increase the distance over which a poacher hiding in African scrub bushveldt can be detected relative to a conventional flashlight. We also test whether any increase in effectiveness is related to the cost and complexity of the equipment by comparing comparatively expensive (22000 USD) and relatively inexpensive (2000 USD) IRT devices. To test these hypotheses we employ a controlled, fully randomised, double-blind procedure to find a poacher in nocturnal field conditions in African bushveldt. Each of our 27 volunteer observers walked three times along a pathway using one detection technology on each pass in randomised order. They searched a prescribed search area of bushveldt within which the target was hiding. Hiding locations were pre-determined, randomised, and changed with each pass. Distances of first detection and positive detection were noted. All technologies could be used to detect the target. Average first detection distance for flashlight was 37.3m, improving by 19.8m to 57.1m using LIRT and by a further 11.2m to 68.3m using HIRT. Although detection distances were significantly greater for both IRTs compared to flashlight, there was no significant difference between LIRT and HIRT. False detection rates were low and there was no significant association between technology and accuracy of detection. Although IRT technology should ideally be tested in the specific environment intended before significant investment is made, we conclude that IRT technology is promising for anti-poaching patrols and that for this purpose low cost IRT units are as effective as units ten times more expensive. Public Library of Science 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4481516/ /pubmed/26110865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131584 Text en © 2015 Hart et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hart, Adam G.
Rolfe, Richard N.
Dandy, Shantelle
Stubbs, Hannah
MacTavish, Dougal
MacTavish, Lynne
Goodenough, Anne E.
Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?
title Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?
title_full Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?
title_fullStr Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?
title_full_unstemmed Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?
title_short Can Handheld Thermal Imaging Technology Improve Detection of Poachers in African Bushveldt?
title_sort can handheld thermal imaging technology improve detection of poachers in african bushveldt?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131584
work_keys_str_mv AT hartadamg canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt
AT rolferichardn canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt
AT dandyshantelle canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt
AT stubbshannah canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt
AT mactavishdougal canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt
AT mactavishlynne canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt
AT goodenoughannee canhandheldthermalimagingtechnologyimprovedetectionofpoachersinafricanbushveldt