Cargando…

An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis

BACKGROUND: One year, prospective, observational study in an Indian subpopulation to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide or antiresorptives in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nineteen teriparatide-naοve Indian men and postmenopau...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chhabra, Harvinder, Malhotra, Rajesh, Marwah, Sunil, Dave, Bharat, See, Kyoungah, Sohal, Simrat, Gurbuz, Sirel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180763
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.159039
_version_ 1782378303654461440
author Chhabra, Harvinder
Malhotra, Rajesh
Marwah, Sunil
Dave, Bharat
See, Kyoungah
Sohal, Simrat
Gurbuz, Sirel
author_facet Chhabra, Harvinder
Malhotra, Rajesh
Marwah, Sunil
Dave, Bharat
See, Kyoungah
Sohal, Simrat
Gurbuz, Sirel
author_sort Chhabra, Harvinder
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One year, prospective, observational study in an Indian subpopulation to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide or antiresorptives in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nineteen teriparatide-naοve Indian men and postmenopausal women (mean age 68.0 years) with previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture participated. Patients were assessed at baseline, 6-and 12-months to evaluate relative risk (RR) of new/worsening back pain using the Back Pain Questionnaire. The incidence of back pain and changes in back pain severity were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); Health outcomes were assessed using the euroquol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. All tests were conducted with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: Of 562 overall patients, 57, 60, and 2 Indian patients received teriparatide, antiresorptive, or teriparatide and antiresorptive, respectively. Baseline disease characteristics were slightly worse for antiresorptive-treated patients, whereas teriparatide-treated patients were older with more comorbidities. At 6-months, the incidence of new/worsening back pain was 5.3% for teriparatide-treated patients versus 4.4% for antiresorptive-treated patients (RR: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 1.48); the incidence of severe back pain was 0% versus 12.5% (P = 0.017); in these treatment groups, respectively. Mean VAS change scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) were − 1.9 ± 1.73 versus − 1.4 ± 1.77, and mean EQ-5D change scores were 4.2 ± 27.20 versus 9.9 ± 26.23 at 6-months. At 6 months, more teriparatide-treated patients felt better (89% vs. 61%; P = 0.001) and were at least very satisfied with their treatment (30% vs. 9%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Teriparatide-treated Indian patients had similar new/worsening back pain risk and minimal risk of severe back pain compared with antiresorptive-treated patients at 6-months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44816542015-07-15 An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis Chhabra, Harvinder Malhotra, Rajesh Marwah, Sunil Dave, Bharat See, Kyoungah Sohal, Simrat Gurbuz, Sirel Indian J Endocrinol Metab Original Article BACKGROUND: One year, prospective, observational study in an Indian subpopulation to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide or antiresorptives in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nineteen teriparatide-naοve Indian men and postmenopausal women (mean age 68.0 years) with previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture participated. Patients were assessed at baseline, 6-and 12-months to evaluate relative risk (RR) of new/worsening back pain using the Back Pain Questionnaire. The incidence of back pain and changes in back pain severity were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); Health outcomes were assessed using the euroquol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. All tests were conducted with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: Of 562 overall patients, 57, 60, and 2 Indian patients received teriparatide, antiresorptive, or teriparatide and antiresorptive, respectively. Baseline disease characteristics were slightly worse for antiresorptive-treated patients, whereas teriparatide-treated patients were older with more comorbidities. At 6-months, the incidence of new/worsening back pain was 5.3% for teriparatide-treated patients versus 4.4% for antiresorptive-treated patients (RR: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 1.48); the incidence of severe back pain was 0% versus 12.5% (P = 0.017); in these treatment groups, respectively. Mean VAS change scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) were − 1.9 ± 1.73 versus − 1.4 ± 1.77, and mean EQ-5D change scores were 4.2 ± 27.20 versus 9.9 ± 26.23 at 6-months. At 6 months, more teriparatide-treated patients felt better (89% vs. 61%; P = 0.001) and were at least very satisfied with their treatment (30% vs. 9%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Teriparatide-treated Indian patients had similar new/worsening back pain risk and minimal risk of severe back pain compared with antiresorptive-treated patients at 6-months. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4481654/ /pubmed/26180763 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.159039 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chhabra, Harvinder
Malhotra, Rajesh
Marwah, Sunil
Dave, Bharat
See, Kyoungah
Sohal, Simrat
Gurbuz, Sirel
An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis
title An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis
title_full An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis
title_fullStr An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis
title_full_unstemmed An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis
title_short An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis
title_sort observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: an indian subpopulation analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26180763
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.159039
work_keys_str_mv AT chhabraharvinder anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT malhotrarajesh anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT marwahsunil anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT davebharat anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT seekyoungah anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT sohalsimrat anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT gurbuzsirel anobservationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT chhabraharvinder observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT malhotrarajesh observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT marwahsunil observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT davebharat observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT seekyoungah observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT sohalsimrat observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis
AT gurbuzsirel observationalstudytoassessbackpaininpatientswithsevereosteoporosistreatedwithteriparatideversusantiresorptivesanindiansubpopulationanalysis