Cargando…

A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT: Despite the significant attention directed toward optimizing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there has been less focus on rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of different rehabilitation protocols on clinical outcomes by comparing early vers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Anthony, Villacis, Diego, Yalamanchili, Raj, Hatch, George F. Rick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738115576729
_version_ 1782378308406607872
author Yi, Anthony
Villacis, Diego
Yalamanchili, Raj
Hatch, George F. Rick
author_facet Yi, Anthony
Villacis, Diego
Yalamanchili, Raj
Hatch, George F. Rick
author_sort Yi, Anthony
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Despite the significant attention directed toward optimizing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there has been less focus on rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of different rehabilitation protocols on clinical outcomes by comparing early versus late mobilization approaches and continuous passive mobilization (CPM) versus manual therapy after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched for relevant articles using the keywords rotator cuff, rotator, cuff, tears, lacerations, and rehabilitation to identify articles published from January 1980 to March 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria consisted of articles of level 1 or 2 evidence, written in the English language, and with reported outcomes for early versus late mobilization or rehabilitation with CPM versus manual therapy after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Exclusion criteria consisted of articles of level 3, 4, or 5 evidence, non-English language, and those with significantly different demographic variables between study groups. Included studies were evaluated with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. DATA EXTRACTION: Level of evidence, study type, number of patients enrolled, number of patients at final follow-up, length of follow-up, age, sex, rotator cuff tear size, surgical technique, and concomitant operative procedures were extracted from included articles. Postoperative data included clinical outcome scores, visual analog score for pain, shoulder range of motion, strength, and rotator cuff retear rates. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies met all criteria and were included in the final analysis. Five studies compared early and late mobilization. Two studies compared CPM and manual therapy. CONCLUSION: In general, current data do not definitively demonstrate a significant difference between postoperative rotator cuff rehabilitation protocols that stress different timing of mobilization and use of CPM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44816772016-07-01 A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review Yi, Anthony Villacis, Diego Yalamanchili, Raj Hatch, George F. Rick Sports Health Focus Topic: Upper Extremity CONTEXT: Despite the significant attention directed toward optimizing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, there has been less focus on rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of different rehabilitation protocols on clinical outcomes by comparing early versus late mobilization approaches and continuous passive mobilization (CPM) versus manual therapy after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. DATA SOURCES: PubMed was searched for relevant articles using the keywords rotator cuff, rotator, cuff, tears, lacerations, and rehabilitation to identify articles published from January 1980 to March 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria consisted of articles of level 1 or 2 evidence, written in the English language, and with reported outcomes for early versus late mobilization or rehabilitation with CPM versus manual therapy after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Exclusion criteria consisted of articles of level 3, 4, or 5 evidence, non-English language, and those with significantly different demographic variables between study groups. Included studies were evaluated with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. DATA EXTRACTION: Level of evidence, study type, number of patients enrolled, number of patients at final follow-up, length of follow-up, age, sex, rotator cuff tear size, surgical technique, and concomitant operative procedures were extracted from included articles. Postoperative data included clinical outcome scores, visual analog score for pain, shoulder range of motion, strength, and rotator cuff retear rates. RESULTS: A total of 7 studies met all criteria and were included in the final analysis. Five studies compared early and late mobilization. Two studies compared CPM and manual therapy. CONCLUSION: In general, current data do not definitively demonstrate a significant difference between postoperative rotator cuff rehabilitation protocols that stress different timing of mobilization and use of CPM. SAGE Publications 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4481677/ /pubmed/26137178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738115576729 Text en © 2015 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Focus Topic: Upper Extremity
Yi, Anthony
Villacis, Diego
Yalamanchili, Raj
Hatch, George F. Rick
A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
title A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
title_full A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
title_short A Comparison of Rehabilitation Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
title_sort comparison of rehabilitation methods after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review
topic Focus Topic: Upper Extremity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26137178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738115576729
work_keys_str_mv AT yianthony acomparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT villacisdiego acomparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT yalamanchiliraj acomparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT hatchgeorgefrick acomparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT yianthony comparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT villacisdiego comparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT yalamanchiliraj comparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview
AT hatchgeorgefrick comparisonofrehabilitationmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairasystematicreview