Cargando…
Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common among women globally. In most cases of Assam, Ca Cervix is detected late due to lack of effective screening programme. AIM: To screen the patient at Gynaecology OPD at the age 18-60 yrs by doing pap smear, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.158942 |
_version_ | 1782378311658242048 |
---|---|
author | Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar Nath, Jyan Dip Deka, Harajyoti |
author_facet | Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar Nath, Jyan Dip Deka, Harajyoti |
author_sort | Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common among women globally. In most cases of Assam, Ca Cervix is detected late due to lack of effective screening programme. AIM: To screen the patient at Gynaecology OPD at the age 18-60 yrs by doing pap smear, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid) and to detect sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIN and early Ca Cervix. MATERIAL AND METHOD: It is a cross sectional study of 300 women (18- 60 yrs) who fulfill selection criteria. The pap smear and VIA are done in these cases. In positive cases, cervical biopsy and histopathological studies are done, The sensitivity and specificity of each test are determined and compared. RESULT AND OBSERVATION: The positive result detected from cytology are 22, VIA was positive in 52 cases. The histology of 19 cases are suggestive of CIN and Ca Cervix. DISCUSSION: The findings were compared with other studies and evaluated. SUMMARY: The most common finding in per speculum examination is cervical erosion. The sensitivity of VIA is 89% (versus pap smear-52%) the specificity of VIA is 87% (versus pap smear-95%). The accuracy VIA is 87% compared to pap smear-93%. CONCLUSION: The lack of effective and implementable screening programme lead to reporting of advanced cases of Ca Cervix. If detected at CIN or early Ca cervix stage, effective treatment can be provided with encouraging results. Therefore effective & implementable Ca Cervix screening need to be provided in our country. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4481740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44817402015-07-12 Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar Nath, Jyan Dip Deka, Harajyoti J Midlife Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common among women globally. In most cases of Assam, Ca Cervix is detected late due to lack of effective screening programme. AIM: To screen the patient at Gynaecology OPD at the age 18-60 yrs by doing pap smear, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid) and to detect sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIN and early Ca Cervix. MATERIAL AND METHOD: It is a cross sectional study of 300 women (18- 60 yrs) who fulfill selection criteria. The pap smear and VIA are done in these cases. In positive cases, cervical biopsy and histopathological studies are done, The sensitivity and specificity of each test are determined and compared. RESULT AND OBSERVATION: The positive result detected from cytology are 22, VIA was positive in 52 cases. The histology of 19 cases are suggestive of CIN and Ca Cervix. DISCUSSION: The findings were compared with other studies and evaluated. SUMMARY: The most common finding in per speculum examination is cervical erosion. The sensitivity of VIA is 89% (versus pap smear-52%) the specificity of VIA is 87% (versus pap smear-95%). The accuracy VIA is 87% compared to pap smear-93%. CONCLUSION: The lack of effective and implementable screening programme lead to reporting of advanced cases of Ca Cervix. If detected at CIN or early Ca cervix stage, effective treatment can be provided with encouraging results. Therefore effective & implementable Ca Cervix screening need to be provided in our country. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4481740/ /pubmed/26167054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.158942 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar Nath, Jyan Dip Deka, Harajyoti Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer |
title | Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer |
title_full | Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer |
title_short | Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer |
title_sort | comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of cin and early cervical cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.158942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhattacharyyaashishkumar comparativestudybetweenpapsmearandvisualinspectionwithaceticacidviainscreeningofcinandearlycervicalcancer AT nathjyandip comparativestudybetweenpapsmearandvisualinspectionwithaceticacidviainscreeningofcinandearlycervicalcancer AT dekaharajyoti comparativestudybetweenpapsmearandvisualinspectionwithaceticacidviainscreeningofcinandearlycervicalcancer |