Cargando…

Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common among women globally. In most cases of Assam, Ca Cervix is detected late due to lack of effective screening programme. AIM: To screen the patient at Gynaecology OPD at the age 18-60 yrs by doing pap smear, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar, Nath, Jyan Dip, Deka, Harajyoti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.158942
_version_ 1782378311658242048
author Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar
Nath, Jyan Dip
Deka, Harajyoti
author_facet Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar
Nath, Jyan Dip
Deka, Harajyoti
author_sort Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common among women globally. In most cases of Assam, Ca Cervix is detected late due to lack of effective screening programme. AIM: To screen the patient at Gynaecology OPD at the age 18-60 yrs by doing pap smear, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid) and to detect sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIN and early Ca Cervix. MATERIAL AND METHOD: It is a cross sectional study of 300 women (18- 60 yrs) who fulfill selection criteria. The pap smear and VIA are done in these cases. In positive cases, cervical biopsy and histopathological studies are done, The sensitivity and specificity of each test are determined and compared. RESULT AND OBSERVATION: The positive result detected from cytology are 22, VIA was positive in 52 cases. The histology of 19 cases are suggestive of CIN and Ca Cervix. DISCUSSION: The findings were compared with other studies and evaluated. SUMMARY: The most common finding in per speculum examination is cervical erosion. The sensitivity of VIA is 89% (versus pap smear-52%) the specificity of VIA is 87% (versus pap smear-95%). The accuracy VIA is 87% compared to pap smear-93%. CONCLUSION: The lack of effective and implementable screening programme lead to reporting of advanced cases of Ca Cervix. If detected at CIN or early Ca cervix stage, effective treatment can be provided with encouraging results. Therefore effective & implementable Ca Cervix screening need to be provided in our country.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44817402015-07-12 Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar Nath, Jyan Dip Deka, Harajyoti J Midlife Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most common among women globally. In most cases of Assam, Ca Cervix is detected late due to lack of effective screening programme. AIM: To screen the patient at Gynaecology OPD at the age 18-60 yrs by doing pap smear, VIA (Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid) and to detect sensitivity and specificity for detecting CIN and early Ca Cervix. MATERIAL AND METHOD: It is a cross sectional study of 300 women (18- 60 yrs) who fulfill selection criteria. The pap smear and VIA are done in these cases. In positive cases, cervical biopsy and histopathological studies are done, The sensitivity and specificity of each test are determined and compared. RESULT AND OBSERVATION: The positive result detected from cytology are 22, VIA was positive in 52 cases. The histology of 19 cases are suggestive of CIN and Ca Cervix. DISCUSSION: The findings were compared with other studies and evaluated. SUMMARY: The most common finding in per speculum examination is cervical erosion. The sensitivity of VIA is 89% (versus pap smear-52%) the specificity of VIA is 87% (versus pap smear-95%). The accuracy VIA is 87% compared to pap smear-93%. CONCLUSION: The lack of effective and implementable screening programme lead to reporting of advanced cases of Ca Cervix. If detected at CIN or early Ca cervix stage, effective treatment can be provided with encouraging results. Therefore effective & implementable Ca Cervix screening need to be provided in our country. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4481740/ /pubmed/26167054 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.158942 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Mid-life Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhattacharyya, Ashish Kumar
Nath, Jyan Dip
Deka, Harajyoti
Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
title Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
title_full Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
title_fullStr Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
title_short Comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of CIN and early cervical cancer
title_sort comparative study between pap smear and visual inspection with acetic acid (via) in screening of cin and early cervical cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26167054
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.158942
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyyaashishkumar comparativestudybetweenpapsmearandvisualinspectionwithaceticacidviainscreeningofcinandearlycervicalcancer
AT nathjyandip comparativestudybetweenpapsmearandvisualinspectionwithaceticacidviainscreeningofcinandearlycervicalcancer
AT dekaharajyoti comparativestudybetweenpapsmearandvisualinspectionwithaceticacidviainscreeningofcinandearlycervicalcancer