Cargando…
Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests (ISWT) are enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values in healthy subjects in a broad age range. METHOD: The maximal exercise capacity of 334 apparently healthy s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em
Fisioterapia
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0078 |
_version_ | 1782378332075065344 |
---|---|
author | Ribeiro, Laís R. G. Mesquita, Rafael B. Vidotto, Laís S. Merli, Myriam F. Carvalho, Débora R. de Castro, Larissa A. Probst, Vanessa S. |
author_facet | Ribeiro, Laís R. G. Mesquita, Rafael B. Vidotto, Laís S. Merli, Myriam F. Carvalho, Débora R. de Castro, Larissa A. Probst, Vanessa S. |
author_sort | Ribeiro, Laís R. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests (ISWT) are enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values in healthy subjects in a broad age range. METHOD: The maximal exercise capacity of 334 apparently healthy subjects (age ≥18) was evaluated using the ISWT. The test was performed twice with 30 minutes of rest in between. Heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure (ABP), dyspnea, and leg fatigue were evaluated before and after each test. Subjects were allocated to 6 groups according to their age: G1: 18-29 years; G2: 30-39 years; G3: 40-49 years; G4: 50-59 years; G5: 60-69 years and G6: ≥70 years. RESULTS: All groups had a good performance in the ISWT (median >90% of the predicted distance). The initial HR (HRi) of the second ISWT was higher than the first ISWT in the total sample (p<0.0001), as well as in all groups (p<0.0001). No difference was observed in the behavior of ABP (systolic and diastolic) and dyspnea between the two tests, but this difference occurred for leg fatigue (greater before the second ISWT) in G1 (p<0.05). Most subjects (58%) performed better in the second test. CONCLUSION: 30 minutes of rest between two ISWTs are not enough for all cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values. However, this period appears to be sufficient for blood pressure and performance to recover in most subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4481830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em
Fisioterapia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44818302015-07-17 Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values? Ribeiro, Laís R. G. Mesquita, Rafael B. Vidotto, Laís S. Merli, Myriam F. Carvalho, Débora R. de Castro, Larissa A. Probst, Vanessa S. Braz J Phys Ther Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests (ISWT) are enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values in healthy subjects in a broad age range. METHOD: The maximal exercise capacity of 334 apparently healthy subjects (age ≥18) was evaluated using the ISWT. The test was performed twice with 30 minutes of rest in between. Heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure (ABP), dyspnea, and leg fatigue were evaluated before and after each test. Subjects were allocated to 6 groups according to their age: G1: 18-29 years; G2: 30-39 years; G3: 40-49 years; G4: 50-59 years; G5: 60-69 years and G6: ≥70 years. RESULTS: All groups had a good performance in the ISWT (median >90% of the predicted distance). The initial HR (HRi) of the second ISWT was higher than the first ISWT in the total sample (p<0.0001), as well as in all groups (p<0.0001). No difference was observed in the behavior of ABP (systolic and diastolic) and dyspnea between the two tests, but this difference occurred for leg fatigue (greater before the second ISWT) in G1 (p<0.05). Most subjects (58%) performed better in the second test. CONCLUSION: 30 minutes of rest between two ISWTs are not enough for all cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values. However, this period appears to be sufficient for blood pressure and performance to recover in most subjects. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2015-03-13 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4481830/ /pubmed/25789556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0078 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ribeiro, Laís R. G. Mesquita, Rafael B. Vidotto, Laís S. Merli, Myriam F. Carvalho, Débora R. de Castro, Larissa A. Probst, Vanessa S. Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values? |
title | Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests
enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline
values? |
title_full | Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests
enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline
values? |
title_fullStr | Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests
enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline
values? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests
enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline
values? |
title_short | Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests
enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline
values? |
title_sort | are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests
enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline
values? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ribeirolaisrg are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues AT mesquitarafaelb are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues AT vidottolaiss are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues AT merlimyriamf are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues AT carvalhodeborar are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues AT decastrolarissaa are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues AT probstvanessas are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues |