Cargando…

Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests (ISWT) are enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values in healthy subjects in a broad age range. METHOD: The maximal exercise capacity of 334 apparently healthy s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Laís R. G., Mesquita, Rafael B., Vidotto, Laís S., Merli, Myriam F., Carvalho, Débora R., de Castro, Larissa A., Probst, Vanessa S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0078
_version_ 1782378332075065344
author Ribeiro, Laís R. G.
Mesquita, Rafael B.
Vidotto, Laís S.
Merli, Myriam F.
Carvalho, Débora R.
de Castro, Larissa A.
Probst, Vanessa S.
author_facet Ribeiro, Laís R. G.
Mesquita, Rafael B.
Vidotto, Laís S.
Merli, Myriam F.
Carvalho, Débora R.
de Castro, Larissa A.
Probst, Vanessa S.
author_sort Ribeiro, Laís R. G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests (ISWT) are enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values in healthy subjects in a broad age range. METHOD: The maximal exercise capacity of 334 apparently healthy subjects (age ≥18) was evaluated using the ISWT. The test was performed twice with 30 minutes of rest in between. Heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure (ABP), dyspnea, and leg fatigue were evaluated before and after each test. Subjects were allocated to 6 groups according to their age: G1: 18-29 years; G2: 30-39 years; G3: 40-49 years; G4: 50-59 years; G5: 60-69 years and G6: ≥70 years. RESULTS: All groups had a good performance in the ISWT (median >90% of the predicted distance). The initial HR (HRi) of the second ISWT was higher than the first ISWT in the total sample (p<0.0001), as well as in all groups (p<0.0001). No difference was observed in the behavior of ABP (systolic and diastolic) and dyspnea between the two tests, but this difference occurred for leg fatigue (greater before the second ISWT) in G1 (p<0.05). Most subjects (58%) performed better in the second test. CONCLUSION: 30 minutes of rest between two ISWTs are not enough for all cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values. However, this period appears to be sufficient for blood pressure and performance to recover in most subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44818302015-07-17 Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values? Ribeiro, Laís R. G. Mesquita, Rafael B. Vidotto, Laís S. Merli, Myriam F. Carvalho, Débora R. de Castro, Larissa A. Probst, Vanessa S. Braz J Phys Ther Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To verify whether 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests (ISWT) are enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values in healthy subjects in a broad age range. METHOD: The maximal exercise capacity of 334 apparently healthy subjects (age ≥18) was evaluated using the ISWT. The test was performed twice with 30 minutes of rest in between. Heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure (ABP), dyspnea, and leg fatigue were evaluated before and after each test. Subjects were allocated to 6 groups according to their age: G1: 18-29 years; G2: 30-39 years; G3: 40-49 years; G4: 50-59 years; G5: 60-69 years and G6: ≥70 years. RESULTS: All groups had a good performance in the ISWT (median >90% of the predicted distance). The initial HR (HRi) of the second ISWT was higher than the first ISWT in the total sample (p<0.0001), as well as in all groups (p<0.0001). No difference was observed in the behavior of ABP (systolic and diastolic) and dyspnea between the two tests, but this difference occurred for leg fatigue (greater before the second ISWT) in G1 (p<0.05). Most subjects (58%) performed better in the second test. CONCLUSION: 30 minutes of rest between two ISWTs are not enough for all cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values. However, this period appears to be sufficient for blood pressure and performance to recover in most subjects. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2015-03-13 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4481830/ /pubmed/25789556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0078 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ribeiro, Laís R. G.
Mesquita, Rafael B.
Vidotto, Laís S.
Merli, Myriam F.
Carvalho, Débora R.
de Castro, Larissa A.
Probst, Vanessa S.
Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
title Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
title_full Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
title_fullStr Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
title_full_unstemmed Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
title_short Are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
title_sort are 30 minutes of rest between two incremental shuttle walking tests enough for cardiovascular variables and perceived exertion to return to baseline values?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25789556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0078
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirolaisrg are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues
AT mesquitarafaelb are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues
AT vidottolaiss are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues
AT merlimyriamf are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues
AT carvalhodeborar are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues
AT decastrolarissaa are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues
AT probstvanessas are30minutesofrestbetweentwoincrementalshuttlewalkingtestsenoughforcardiovascularvariablesandperceivedexertiontoreturntobaselinevalues