Cargando…

Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers

BACKGROUND: Accidental falls are a major health problem related to aging and affect one in every three elderly individuals over the age of sixty. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the muscle strength, gait kinematics parameters, and performance in functional tests between elderly subjects with and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cebolla, Elaine C., Rodacki, André L. F., Bento, Paulo C. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25993628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0085
_version_ 1782378333209624576
author Cebolla, Elaine C.
Rodacki, André L. F.
Bento, Paulo C. B.
author_facet Cebolla, Elaine C.
Rodacki, André L. F.
Bento, Paulo C. B.
author_sort Cebolla, Elaine C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accidental falls are a major health problem related to aging and affect one in every three elderly individuals over the age of sixty. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the muscle strength, gait kinematics parameters, and performance in functional tests between elderly subjects with and without a prior history of falls. In addition, the association between the history of falls and the variables that demonstrated differences between groups were tested. METHOD: 62 elderly subjects participated in the study and were allocated to the group with falls history (FG; n=20; 68.0±6.9 years old) or the group without falls history (CG; n=42; 65.5±4.1 years old). Maximal strength, gait kinematics parameters, and functional tests were tested. RESULTS: The FG showed lower muscle strength in the knee flexors (51.45±8.6 vs. 62.09±19 Kg), lower average toe clearance during the swing phase (0.04±0.006 vs. 0.043 ± 0.005 m), and lower performance in the "8-foot up-and-go" test (5.3±0.7 vs. 5.8±0.7 s) (p<0.05). There were no associations between any variables and falls, but the increased time in the "8-foot up-and-go" test may double the likelihood of a fall occurring. CONCLUSION: Fallers have reduced lower limb strength, gait alterations, the worst performance in the dynamic balance test, and an increased risk of falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4481835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44818352015-07-17 Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers Cebolla, Elaine C. Rodacki, André L. F. Bento, Paulo C. B. Braz J Phys Ther Original Articles BACKGROUND: Accidental falls are a major health problem related to aging and affect one in every three elderly individuals over the age of sixty. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the muscle strength, gait kinematics parameters, and performance in functional tests between elderly subjects with and without a prior history of falls. In addition, the association between the history of falls and the variables that demonstrated differences between groups were tested. METHOD: 62 elderly subjects participated in the study and were allocated to the group with falls history (FG; n=20; 68.0±6.9 years old) or the group without falls history (CG; n=42; 65.5±4.1 years old). Maximal strength, gait kinematics parameters, and functional tests were tested. RESULTS: The FG showed lower muscle strength in the knee flexors (51.45±8.6 vs. 62.09±19 Kg), lower average toe clearance during the swing phase (0.04±0.006 vs. 0.043 ± 0.005 m), and lower performance in the "8-foot up-and-go" test (5.3±0.7 vs. 5.8±0.7 s) (p<0.05). There were no associations between any variables and falls, but the increased time in the "8-foot up-and-go" test may double the likelihood of a fall occurring. CONCLUSION: Fallers have reduced lower limb strength, gait alterations, the worst performance in the dynamic balance test, and an increased risk of falls. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2015-04-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4481835/ /pubmed/25993628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0085 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cebolla, Elaine C.
Rodacki, André L. F.
Bento, Paulo C. B.
Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
title Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
title_full Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
title_fullStr Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
title_full_unstemmed Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
title_short Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
title_sort balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25993628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0085
work_keys_str_mv AT cebollaelainec balancegaitfunctionalityandstrengthcomparisonbetweenelderlyfallersandnonfallers
AT rodackiandrelf balancegaitfunctionalityandstrengthcomparisonbetweenelderlyfallersandnonfallers
AT bentopaulocb balancegaitfunctionalityandstrengthcomparisonbetweenelderlyfallersandnonfallers