Cargando…

Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire

BACKGROUND: The Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) was developed as an elbow joint specific measure of pain and disability and validated with classical psychometric methods. More recently, Rasch analysis has contributed new methods for analyzing the clinical measurement properties of self-report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincent, Joshua I., MacDermid, Joy C., King, Graham J. W., Grewal, Ruby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26092294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0275-8
_version_ 1782378376394178560
author Vincent, Joshua I.
MacDermid, Joy C.
King, Graham J. W.
Grewal, Ruby
author_facet Vincent, Joshua I.
MacDermid, Joy C.
King, Graham J. W.
Grewal, Ruby
author_sort Vincent, Joshua I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) was developed as an elbow joint specific measure of pain and disability and validated with classical psychometric methods. More recently, Rasch analysis has contributed new methods for analyzing the clinical measurement properties of self-report outcome measures. The objective of the study was to determine aspects of validity of the PREE using the Rasch model to assess the overall fit of the PREE data, the response scaling, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), local dependency, unidimensionality and person separation index (PSI). METHODS: A convenience sample of 236 patients (Age range 21–79 years; M: F- 97:139) with elbow disorders were recruited from the Roth│McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. The baseline scores of the PREE were used. Rasch analysis was conducted using RUMM 2030 software on the 3 sub scales of the PREE separately. RESULTS: The 3 sub scales showed misfit initially with disordered thresholds on17 out of 20 items), uniform DIF was observed for two items (“Carrying a 10lbs object” from specific activities subscale for age group; and “household work” from the usual activities subscale for gender); multidimensionality and local dependency. The Pain subscale satisfied Rasch expectations when item 2 “Pain – At rest” was split for age group, while the usual activities subscale readily stood up to Rasch requirements when the item 2 “household work” was split for gender. The specific activities subscale demonstrated fit to the Rasch model when sub test analysis accounted for local dependency. All three subscales of the PREE were well targeted and had high reliability (PSI >0.80). CONCLUSION: The three subscales of the PREE appear to be robust when tested against the Rasch model when subject to a few alterations. The value of changing the 0–10 format is questionable given its widespread use; further Rasch-based analysis of whether these findings are stable in other samples is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4482053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44820532015-06-27 Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire Vincent, Joshua I. MacDermid, Joy C. King, Graham J. W. Grewal, Ruby Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) was developed as an elbow joint specific measure of pain and disability and validated with classical psychometric methods. More recently, Rasch analysis has contributed new methods for analyzing the clinical measurement properties of self-report outcome measures. The objective of the study was to determine aspects of validity of the PREE using the Rasch model to assess the overall fit of the PREE data, the response scaling, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF), local dependency, unidimensionality and person separation index (PSI). METHODS: A convenience sample of 236 patients (Age range 21–79 years; M: F- 97:139) with elbow disorders were recruited from the Roth│McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. The baseline scores of the PREE were used. Rasch analysis was conducted using RUMM 2030 software on the 3 sub scales of the PREE separately. RESULTS: The 3 sub scales showed misfit initially with disordered thresholds on17 out of 20 items), uniform DIF was observed for two items (“Carrying a 10lbs object” from specific activities subscale for age group; and “household work” from the usual activities subscale for gender); multidimensionality and local dependency. The Pain subscale satisfied Rasch expectations when item 2 “Pain – At rest” was split for age group, while the usual activities subscale readily stood up to Rasch requirements when the item 2 “household work” was split for gender. The specific activities subscale demonstrated fit to the Rasch model when sub test analysis accounted for local dependency. All three subscales of the PREE were well targeted and had high reliability (PSI >0.80). CONCLUSION: The three subscales of the PREE appear to be robust when tested against the Rasch model when subject to a few alterations. The value of changing the 0–10 format is questionable given its widespread use; further Rasch-based analysis of whether these findings are stable in other samples is warranted. BioMed Central 2015-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4482053/ /pubmed/26092294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0275-8 Text en © Vincent et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Vincent, Joshua I.
MacDermid, Joy C.
King, Graham J. W.
Grewal, Ruby
Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
title Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
title_full Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
title_fullStr Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
title_short Rasch analysis of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire
title_sort rasch analysis of the patient rated elbow evaluation questionnaire
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26092294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0275-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentjoshuai raschanalysisofthepatientratedelbowevaluationquestionnaire
AT macdermidjoyc raschanalysisofthepatientratedelbowevaluationquestionnaire
AT kinggrahamjw raschanalysisofthepatientratedelbowevaluationquestionnaire
AT grewalruby raschanalysisofthepatientratedelbowevaluationquestionnaire