Cargando…

Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference

In sports, the role of backswing is considered critical for generating a good shot, even though it plays no direct role in hitting the ball. We recently demonstrated the scientific basis of this phenomenon by showing that immediate past movement affects the learning and recall of motor memories. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howard, Ian S., Franklin, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131268
_version_ 1782378439088537600
author Howard, Ian S.
Franklin, David W.
author_facet Howard, Ian S.
Franklin, David W.
author_sort Howard, Ian S.
collection PubMed
description In sports, the role of backswing is considered critical for generating a good shot, even though it plays no direct role in hitting the ball. We recently demonstrated the scientific basis of this phenomenon by showing that immediate past movement affects the learning and recall of motor memories. This effect occurred regardless of whether the past contextual movement was performed actively, passively, or shown visually. In force field studies, it has been shown that motor memories generalize locally and that the level of compensation decays as a function of movement angle away from the trained movement. Here we examine if the contextual effect of past movement exhibits similar patterns of generalization and whether it can explain behavior seen in interference studies. Using a single force-field learning task, the directional tuning curves of both the prior contextual movement and the subsequent force field adaptive movements were measured. The adaptation movement direction showed strong directional tuning, decaying to zero by 90° relative to the training direction. The contextual movement direction exhibited a similar directional tuning, although the effect was always above 60%. We then investigated the directional tuning of the passive contextual movement using interference tasks, where the contextual movements that uniquely specified the force field direction were separated by ±15° or ±45°. Both groups showed a pronounced tuning effect, which could be well explained by the directional tuning functions for single force fields. Our results show that contextual effect of past movement influences predictive force compensation, even when adaptation does not require contextual information. However, when such past movement contextual information is crucial to the task, such as in an interference study, it plays a strong role in motor memory learning and recall. This work demonstrates that similar tuning responses underlie both generalization of movement direction during dynamic learning and contextual movements in both single force field and interference tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4482423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44824232015-07-01 Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference Howard, Ian S. Franklin, David W. PLoS One Research Article In sports, the role of backswing is considered critical for generating a good shot, even though it plays no direct role in hitting the ball. We recently demonstrated the scientific basis of this phenomenon by showing that immediate past movement affects the learning and recall of motor memories. This effect occurred regardless of whether the past contextual movement was performed actively, passively, or shown visually. In force field studies, it has been shown that motor memories generalize locally and that the level of compensation decays as a function of movement angle away from the trained movement. Here we examine if the contextual effect of past movement exhibits similar patterns of generalization and whether it can explain behavior seen in interference studies. Using a single force-field learning task, the directional tuning curves of both the prior contextual movement and the subsequent force field adaptive movements were measured. The adaptation movement direction showed strong directional tuning, decaying to zero by 90° relative to the training direction. The contextual movement direction exhibited a similar directional tuning, although the effect was always above 60%. We then investigated the directional tuning of the passive contextual movement using interference tasks, where the contextual movements that uniquely specified the force field direction were separated by ±15° or ±45°. Both groups showed a pronounced tuning effect, which could be well explained by the directional tuning functions for single force fields. Our results show that contextual effect of past movement influences predictive force compensation, even when adaptation does not require contextual information. However, when such past movement contextual information is crucial to the task, such as in an interference study, it plays a strong role in motor memory learning and recall. This work demonstrates that similar tuning responses underlie both generalization of movement direction during dynamic learning and contextual movements in both single force field and interference tasks. Public Library of Science 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4482423/ /pubmed/26110871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131268 Text en © 2015 Howard, Franklin http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Howard, Ian S.
Franklin, David W.
Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference
title Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference
title_full Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference
title_fullStr Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference
title_full_unstemmed Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference
title_short Neural Tuning Functions Underlie Both Generalization and Interference
title_sort neural tuning functions underlie both generalization and interference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131268
work_keys_str_mv AT howardians neuraltuningfunctionsunderliebothgeneralizationandinterference
AT franklindavidw neuraltuningfunctionsunderliebothgeneralizationandinterference