Cargando…

Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer

This is a retrospective study which aims to identify major determinants of successful laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) performed by inexperienced surgeons for stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. A total of 161 consecutive patients with stage IA2–IIA cerv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suh, Dong Hoon, Cho, Hye-Yon, Kim, Kidong, No, Jae Hong, Kim, Yong-Beom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131170
_version_ 1782378443485216768
author Suh, Dong Hoon
Cho, Hye-Yon
Kim, Kidong
No, Jae Hong
Kim, Yong-Beom
author_facet Suh, Dong Hoon
Cho, Hye-Yon
Kim, Kidong
No, Jae Hong
Kim, Yong-Beom
author_sort Suh, Dong Hoon
collection PubMed
description This is a retrospective study which aims to identify major determinants of successful laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) performed by inexperienced surgeons for stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. A total of 161 consecutive patients with stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer who underwent RH were grouped into 2 groups according to the surgeons’ experience with LRH: experienced surgeon versus inexperienced surgeon. After matching for age and risk factors, surgical and survival outcomes were compared. Experienced surgeon selected patients with earlier-stage and fewer risk factors for LRH than ARH, but inexperience surgeons did not. After matching, the vaginal tumor-free margin of LRH was shorter than that of ARH in experienced surgeon group (1.3 versus 1.7 cm, p=0.007); however, the vaginal tumor-free margin was longer than that of ARH in the inexperienced surgeon group (1.8 versus 1.3 cm, p=0.035). The postoperative hospital stay of LRH was shorter than that of ARH in experienced surgeon group (5.5 versus 7.7 days, p<0.001), but not different from that of ARH in the inexperienced surgeon group. Vaginal tumor-free margin >1.8 cm (OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.22–40.42), stage >IB1 (OR 8.83, 95% CI 1.51–51.73), and estimated blood loss >575 mL (OR 33.95, 95% CI 4.87–236.79) were independent risk factors for longer postoperative hospital stay in the inexperienced surgeon group. There was no difference of 5-year-profression-free survival of LRH patients between experienced surgeon and inexperienced surgeon groups after matching (55.1 versus 33.3%, p=0.391). Selection of earlier-stage disease and moderate vaginal tumor-free margin might be important for an inexperienced surgeon to successfully perform LRH with minimal complications in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4482442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44824422015-07-01 Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer Suh, Dong Hoon Cho, Hye-Yon Kim, Kidong No, Jae Hong Kim, Yong-Beom PLoS One Research Article This is a retrospective study which aims to identify major determinants of successful laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) performed by inexperienced surgeons for stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. A total of 161 consecutive patients with stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer who underwent RH were grouped into 2 groups according to the surgeons’ experience with LRH: experienced surgeon versus inexperienced surgeon. After matching for age and risk factors, surgical and survival outcomes were compared. Experienced surgeon selected patients with earlier-stage and fewer risk factors for LRH than ARH, but inexperience surgeons did not. After matching, the vaginal tumor-free margin of LRH was shorter than that of ARH in experienced surgeon group (1.3 versus 1.7 cm, p=0.007); however, the vaginal tumor-free margin was longer than that of ARH in the inexperienced surgeon group (1.8 versus 1.3 cm, p=0.035). The postoperative hospital stay of LRH was shorter than that of ARH in experienced surgeon group (5.5 versus 7.7 days, p<0.001), but not different from that of ARH in the inexperienced surgeon group. Vaginal tumor-free margin >1.8 cm (OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.22–40.42), stage >IB1 (OR 8.83, 95% CI 1.51–51.73), and estimated blood loss >575 mL (OR 33.95, 95% CI 4.87–236.79) were independent risk factors for longer postoperative hospital stay in the inexperienced surgeon group. There was no difference of 5-year-profression-free survival of LRH patients between experienced surgeon and inexperienced surgeon groups after matching (55.1 versus 33.3%, p=0.391). Selection of earlier-stage disease and moderate vaginal tumor-free margin might be important for an inexperienced surgeon to successfully perform LRH with minimal complications in stage IA2–IIA cervical cancer. Public Library of Science 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4482442/ /pubmed/26110866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131170 Text en © 2015 Suh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suh, Dong Hoon
Cho, Hye-Yon
Kim, Kidong
No, Jae Hong
Kim, Yong-Beom
Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
title Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
title_full Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
title_short Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons’ Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer
title_sort matched-case comparisons in a single institution to determine critical points for inexperienced surgeons’ successful performances of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage ia2-iia cervical cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131170
work_keys_str_mv AT suhdonghoon matchedcasecomparisonsinasingleinstitutiontodeterminecriticalpointsforinexperiencedsurgeonssuccessfulperformancesoflaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusabdominalradicalhysterectomyinstageia2iiacervicalcancer
AT chohyeyon matchedcasecomparisonsinasingleinstitutiontodeterminecriticalpointsforinexperiencedsurgeonssuccessfulperformancesoflaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusabdominalradicalhysterectomyinstageia2iiacervicalcancer
AT kimkidong matchedcasecomparisonsinasingleinstitutiontodeterminecriticalpointsforinexperiencedsurgeonssuccessfulperformancesoflaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusabdominalradicalhysterectomyinstageia2iiacervicalcancer
AT nojaehong matchedcasecomparisonsinasingleinstitutiontodeterminecriticalpointsforinexperiencedsurgeonssuccessfulperformancesoflaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusabdominalradicalhysterectomyinstageia2iiacervicalcancer
AT kimyongbeom matchedcasecomparisonsinasingleinstitutiontodeterminecriticalpointsforinexperiencedsurgeonssuccessfulperformancesoflaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyversusabdominalradicalhysterectomyinstageia2iiacervicalcancer