Cargando…

Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample

BACKGROUND: There is limited research regarding the association between genes and cognitive intermediate phenotypes in those at risk for psychotic disorders. METHODS: We measured the association between established psychosis risk variants in dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and cognitive performance in i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramsay, Hugh, Barnett, Jennifer H., Miettunen, Jouko, Mukkala, Sari, Mäki, Pirjo, Liuhanen, Johanna, Murray, Graham K., Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta, Ollila, Hanna, Paunio, Tiina, Veijola, Juha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127602
_version_ 1782378486684450816
author Ramsay, Hugh
Barnett, Jennifer H.
Miettunen, Jouko
Mukkala, Sari
Mäki, Pirjo
Liuhanen, Johanna
Murray, Graham K.
Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Ollila, Hanna
Paunio, Tiina
Veijola, Juha
author_facet Ramsay, Hugh
Barnett, Jennifer H.
Miettunen, Jouko
Mukkala, Sari
Mäki, Pirjo
Liuhanen, Johanna
Murray, Graham K.
Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Ollila, Hanna
Paunio, Tiina
Veijola, Juha
author_sort Ramsay, Hugh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is limited research regarding the association between genes and cognitive intermediate phenotypes in those at risk for psychotic disorders. METHODS: We measured the association between established psychosis risk variants in dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and cognitive performance in individuals at age 23 years and explored if associations between cognition and these variants differed according to the presence of familial or clinical risk for psychosis. The subjects of the Oulu Brain and Mind Study were drawn from the general population-based Northern Finland 1986 Birth Cohort (NFBC 1986). Using linear regression, we compared the associations between cognitive performance and two candidate DRD2 polymorphisms (rs6277 and rs1800497) between subjects having familial (n=61) and clinical (n=45) risk for psychosis and a random sample of participating NFBC 1986 controls (n=74). Cognitive performance was evaluated using a comprehensive battery of tests at follow-up. RESULTS: Principal components factor analysis supported a three-factor model for cognitive measures. The minor allele of rs6277 was associated with poorer performance on a verbal factor (p=0.003) but this did not significantly interact with familial or clinical risk for psychosis. The minor allele of rs1800497 was associated with poorer performance on a psychomotor factor (p=0.038), though only in those at familial risk for psychotic disorders (interaction p=0.049). CONCLUSION: The effect of two DRD2 SNPs on cognitive performance may differ according to risk type for psychosis, suggesting that cognitive intermediate phenotypes differ according to the type (familial or clinical) risk for psychosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4482687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44826872015-06-29 Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample Ramsay, Hugh Barnett, Jennifer H. Miettunen, Jouko Mukkala, Sari Mäki, Pirjo Liuhanen, Johanna Murray, Graham K. Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta Ollila, Hanna Paunio, Tiina Veijola, Juha PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There is limited research regarding the association between genes and cognitive intermediate phenotypes in those at risk for psychotic disorders. METHODS: We measured the association between established psychosis risk variants in dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and cognitive performance in individuals at age 23 years and explored if associations between cognition and these variants differed according to the presence of familial or clinical risk for psychosis. The subjects of the Oulu Brain and Mind Study were drawn from the general population-based Northern Finland 1986 Birth Cohort (NFBC 1986). Using linear regression, we compared the associations between cognitive performance and two candidate DRD2 polymorphisms (rs6277 and rs1800497) between subjects having familial (n=61) and clinical (n=45) risk for psychosis and a random sample of participating NFBC 1986 controls (n=74). Cognitive performance was evaluated using a comprehensive battery of tests at follow-up. RESULTS: Principal components factor analysis supported a three-factor model for cognitive measures. The minor allele of rs6277 was associated with poorer performance on a verbal factor (p=0.003) but this did not significantly interact with familial or clinical risk for psychosis. The minor allele of rs1800497 was associated with poorer performance on a psychomotor factor (p=0.038), though only in those at familial risk for psychotic disorders (interaction p=0.049). CONCLUSION: The effect of two DRD2 SNPs on cognitive performance may differ according to risk type for psychosis, suggesting that cognitive intermediate phenotypes differ according to the type (familial or clinical) risk for psychosis. Public Library of Science 2015-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4482687/ /pubmed/26114663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127602 Text en © 2015 Ramsay et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramsay, Hugh
Barnett, Jennifer H.
Miettunen, Jouko
Mukkala, Sari
Mäki, Pirjo
Liuhanen, Johanna
Murray, Graham K.
Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
Ollila, Hanna
Paunio, Tiina
Veijola, Juha
Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample
title Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample
title_full Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample
title_fullStr Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample
title_full_unstemmed Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample
title_short Association between Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2) Variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and Cognitive Performance According to Risk Type for Psychosis: A Nested Case Control Study in a Finnish Population Sample
title_sort association between dopamine receptor d2 (drd2) variations rs6277 and rs1800497 and cognitive performance according to risk type for psychosis: a nested case control study in a finnish population sample
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127602
work_keys_str_mv AT ramsayhugh associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT barnettjenniferh associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT miettunenjouko associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT mukkalasari associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT makipirjo associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT liuhanenjohanna associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT murraygrahamk associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT jarvelinmarjoriitta associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT ollilahanna associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT pauniotiina associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample
AT veijolajuha associationbetweendopaminereceptord2drd2variationsrs6277andrs1800497andcognitiveperformanceaccordingtorisktypeforpsychosisanestedcasecontrolstudyinafinnishpopulationsample