Cargando…
Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children
BACKGROUND: Several infectious diseases and therapeutic interventions cause gut microbe dysbiosis and associated pathology. We characterised the gut microbiome of children exposed to the helminth Schistosoma haematobium pre- and post-treatment with the drug praziquantel (PZQ), with the aim to compar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003861 |
_version_ | 1782378499653238784 |
---|---|
author | Kay, Gemma Louise Millard, Andrew Sergeant, Martin J. Midzi, Nicholas Gwisai, Reggis Mduluza, Takafira Ivens, Alasdair Nausch, Norman Mutapi, Francisca Pallen, Mark |
author_facet | Kay, Gemma Louise Millard, Andrew Sergeant, Martin J. Midzi, Nicholas Gwisai, Reggis Mduluza, Takafira Ivens, Alasdair Nausch, Norman Mutapi, Francisca Pallen, Mark |
author_sort | Kay, Gemma Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several infectious diseases and therapeutic interventions cause gut microbe dysbiosis and associated pathology. We characterised the gut microbiome of children exposed to the helminth Schistosoma haematobium pre- and post-treatment with the drug praziquantel (PZQ), with the aim to compare the gut microbiome structure (abundance and diversity) in schistosome infected vs. uninfected children. METHODS: Stool DNA from 139 children aged six months to 13 years old; with S. haematobium infection prevalence of 27.34% was extracted at baseline. 12 weeks following antihelminthic treatment with praziqunatel, stool DNA was collected from 62 of the 139 children. The 16S rRNA genes were sequenced from the baseline and post-treatment samples and the sequence data, clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The OTU data were analysed using multivariate analyses and paired T- test. RESULTS: Pre-treatment, the most abundant phyla were Bacteroidetes, followed by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria respectively. The relative abundance of taxa among bacterial classes showed limited variation by age group or sex and the bacterial communities had similar overall compositions. Although there were no overall differences in the microbiome structure across the whole age range, the abundance of 21 OTUs varied significantly with age (FDR<0.05). Some OTUs including Veillonella, Streptococcus, Bacteroides and Helicobacter were more abundant in children ≤ 1 year old compared to older children. Furthermore, the gut microbiome differed in schistosome infected vs. uninfected children with 27 OTU occurring in infected but not uninfected children, for 5 of these all Prevotella, the difference was statistically significant (p <0.05) with FDR <0.05. PZQ treatment did not alter the microbiome structure in infected or uninfected children from that observed at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the gut microbiome structure of infected vs. uninfected children and the differences were refractory to PZQ treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4482744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44827442015-06-29 Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children Kay, Gemma Louise Millard, Andrew Sergeant, Martin J. Midzi, Nicholas Gwisai, Reggis Mduluza, Takafira Ivens, Alasdair Nausch, Norman Mutapi, Francisca Pallen, Mark PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Several infectious diseases and therapeutic interventions cause gut microbe dysbiosis and associated pathology. We characterised the gut microbiome of children exposed to the helminth Schistosoma haematobium pre- and post-treatment with the drug praziquantel (PZQ), with the aim to compare the gut microbiome structure (abundance and diversity) in schistosome infected vs. uninfected children. METHODS: Stool DNA from 139 children aged six months to 13 years old; with S. haematobium infection prevalence of 27.34% was extracted at baseline. 12 weeks following antihelminthic treatment with praziqunatel, stool DNA was collected from 62 of the 139 children. The 16S rRNA genes were sequenced from the baseline and post-treatment samples and the sequence data, clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The OTU data were analysed using multivariate analyses and paired T- test. RESULTS: Pre-treatment, the most abundant phyla were Bacteroidetes, followed by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria respectively. The relative abundance of taxa among bacterial classes showed limited variation by age group or sex and the bacterial communities had similar overall compositions. Although there were no overall differences in the microbiome structure across the whole age range, the abundance of 21 OTUs varied significantly with age (FDR<0.05). Some OTUs including Veillonella, Streptococcus, Bacteroides and Helicobacter were more abundant in children ≤ 1 year old compared to older children. Furthermore, the gut microbiome differed in schistosome infected vs. uninfected children with 27 OTU occurring in infected but not uninfected children, for 5 of these all Prevotella, the difference was statistically significant (p <0.05) with FDR <0.05. PZQ treatment did not alter the microbiome structure in infected or uninfected children from that observed at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the gut microbiome structure of infected vs. uninfected children and the differences were refractory to PZQ treatment. Public Library of Science 2015-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4482744/ /pubmed/26114287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003861 Text en © 2015 Kay et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kay, Gemma Louise Millard, Andrew Sergeant, Martin J. Midzi, Nicholas Gwisai, Reggis Mduluza, Takafira Ivens, Alasdair Nausch, Norman Mutapi, Francisca Pallen, Mark Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children |
title | Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children |
title_full | Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children |
title_fullStr | Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children |
title_short | Differences in the Faecal Microbiome in Schistosoma haematobium Infected Children vs. Uninfected Children |
title_sort | differences in the faecal microbiome in schistosoma haematobium infected children vs. uninfected children |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaygemmalouise differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT millardandrew differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT sergeantmartinj differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT midzinicholas differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT gwisaireggis differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT mduluzatakafira differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT ivensalasdair differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT nauschnorman differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT mutapifrancisca differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren AT pallenmark differencesinthefaecalmicrobiomeinschistosomahaematobiuminfectedchildrenvsuninfectedchildren |