Cargando…
Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches
The aim of this article was to define the sampling level and method combination that captures antibiotic resistance at pig herd level utilizing qPCR antibiotic resistance gene quantification and culture-based quantification of antibiotic resistant coliform indicator bacteria. Fourteen qPCR assays fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131672 |
_version_ | 1782378524789702656 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Gunilla Veslemøy Mellerup, Anders Christiansen, Lasse Engbo Ståhl, Marie Olsen, John Elmerdahl Angen, Øystein |
author_facet | Schmidt, Gunilla Veslemøy Mellerup, Anders Christiansen, Lasse Engbo Ståhl, Marie Olsen, John Elmerdahl Angen, Øystein |
author_sort | Schmidt, Gunilla Veslemøy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this article was to define the sampling level and method combination that captures antibiotic resistance at pig herd level utilizing qPCR antibiotic resistance gene quantification and culture-based quantification of antibiotic resistant coliform indicator bacteria. Fourteen qPCR assays for commonly detected antibiotic resistance genes were developed, and used to quantify antibiotic resistance genes in total DNA from swine fecal samples that were obtained using different sampling and pooling methods. In parallel, the number of antibiotic resistant coliform indicator bacteria was determined in the same swine fecal samples. The results showed that the qPCR assays were capable of detecting differences in antibiotic resistance levels in individual animals that the coliform bacteria colony forming units (CFU) could not. Also, the qPCR assays more accurately quantified antibiotic resistance genes when comparing individual sampling and pooling methods. qPCR on pooled samples was found to be a good representative for the general resistance level in a pig herd compared to the coliform CFU counts. It had significantly reduced relative standard deviations compared to coliform CFU counts in the same samples, and therefore differences in antibiotic resistance levels between samples were more readily detected. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe sampling and pooling methods for qPCR quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in total DNA extracted from swine feces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4483237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44832372015-06-29 Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches Schmidt, Gunilla Veslemøy Mellerup, Anders Christiansen, Lasse Engbo Ståhl, Marie Olsen, John Elmerdahl Angen, Øystein PLoS One Research Article The aim of this article was to define the sampling level and method combination that captures antibiotic resistance at pig herd level utilizing qPCR antibiotic resistance gene quantification and culture-based quantification of antibiotic resistant coliform indicator bacteria. Fourteen qPCR assays for commonly detected antibiotic resistance genes were developed, and used to quantify antibiotic resistance genes in total DNA from swine fecal samples that were obtained using different sampling and pooling methods. In parallel, the number of antibiotic resistant coliform indicator bacteria was determined in the same swine fecal samples. The results showed that the qPCR assays were capable of detecting differences in antibiotic resistance levels in individual animals that the coliform bacteria colony forming units (CFU) could not. Also, the qPCR assays more accurately quantified antibiotic resistance genes when comparing individual sampling and pooling methods. qPCR on pooled samples was found to be a good representative for the general resistance level in a pig herd compared to the coliform CFU counts. It had significantly reduced relative standard deviations compared to coliform CFU counts in the same samples, and therefore differences in antibiotic resistance levels between samples were more readily detected. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe sampling and pooling methods for qPCR quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in total DNA extracted from swine feces. Public Library of Science 2015-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4483237/ /pubmed/26114765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131672 Text en © 2015 Schmidt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schmidt, Gunilla Veslemøy Mellerup, Anders Christiansen, Lasse Engbo Ståhl, Marie Olsen, John Elmerdahl Angen, Øystein Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches |
title | Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches |
title_full | Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches |
title_fullStr | Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches |
title_short | Sampling and Pooling Methods for Capturing Herd Level Antibiotic Resistance in Swine Feces using qPCR and CFU Approaches |
title_sort | sampling and pooling methods for capturing herd level antibiotic resistance in swine feces using qpcr and cfu approaches |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtgunillaveslemøy samplingandpoolingmethodsforcapturingherdlevelantibioticresistanceinswinefecesusingqpcrandcfuapproaches AT mellerupanders samplingandpoolingmethodsforcapturingherdlevelantibioticresistanceinswinefecesusingqpcrandcfuapproaches AT christiansenlasseengbo samplingandpoolingmethodsforcapturingherdlevelantibioticresistanceinswinefecesusingqpcrandcfuapproaches AT stahlmarie samplingandpoolingmethodsforcapturingherdlevelantibioticresistanceinswinefecesusingqpcrandcfuapproaches AT olsenjohnelmerdahl samplingandpoolingmethodsforcapturingherdlevelantibioticresistanceinswinefecesusingqpcrandcfuapproaches AT angenøystein samplingandpoolingmethodsforcapturingherdlevelantibioticresistanceinswinefecesusingqpcrandcfuapproaches |