Cargando…

Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility and validity of the 50-m walking test. [Subjects] Reproducibility was investigated in 19 community-dwelling elderly women (mean age, 76.3 years), and validity was investigated in 31 community-dwelling elderly individuals (12 men and 19 wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hachiya, Mizuki, Murata, Shin, Otao, Hiroshi, Kamijou, Kenji, Mizota, Katsuhiko, Asami, Toyoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1511
_version_ 1782378560718110720
author Hachiya, Mizuki
Murata, Shin
Otao, Hiroshi
Kamijou, Kenji
Mizota, Katsuhiko
Asami, Toyoko
author_facet Hachiya, Mizuki
Murata, Shin
Otao, Hiroshi
Kamijou, Kenji
Mizota, Katsuhiko
Asami, Toyoko
author_sort Hachiya, Mizuki
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility and validity of the 50-m walking test. [Subjects] Reproducibility was investigated in 19 community-dwelling elderly women (mean age, 76.3 years), and validity was investigated in 31 community-dwelling elderly individuals (12 men and 19 women; mean age, 75.7 years). [Methods] The time taken to walk 50 m, the time taken to walk each 10-m section (laps 1–5), the time taken to walk 10 m, and grip strength were measured. In addition, the functional reach test (FRT), one-leg standing test, and timed up and go (TUG) test were performed. [Results] In a reproducibility analysis, the interclass correlation coefficient (1,1) was 0.97. In a Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic error was found. The measured values from the 50-m walking test included a measurement error of 1.5 s, and the acceptable margin of error was confirmed to be 3.1 s. In a validity analysis, the 50-m walking test score was significantly correlated with the 10-m walking and TUG test scores. [Conclusion] Our results suggest that the 50-m walking test score may be a useful index of the walking ability of community-dwelling elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4483430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44834302015-07-08 Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly Hachiya, Mizuki Murata, Shin Otao, Hiroshi Kamijou, Kenji Mizota, Katsuhiko Asami, Toyoko J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility and validity of the 50-m walking test. [Subjects] Reproducibility was investigated in 19 community-dwelling elderly women (mean age, 76.3 years), and validity was investigated in 31 community-dwelling elderly individuals (12 men and 19 women; mean age, 75.7 years). [Methods] The time taken to walk 50 m, the time taken to walk each 10-m section (laps 1–5), the time taken to walk 10 m, and grip strength were measured. In addition, the functional reach test (FRT), one-leg standing test, and timed up and go (TUG) test were performed. [Results] In a reproducibility analysis, the interclass correlation coefficient (1,1) was 0.97. In a Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic error was found. The measured values from the 50-m walking test included a measurement error of 1.5 s, and the acceptable margin of error was confirmed to be 3.1 s. In a validity analysis, the 50-m walking test score was significantly correlated with the 10-m walking and TUG test scores. [Conclusion] Our results suggest that the 50-m walking test score may be a useful index of the walking ability of community-dwelling elderly. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-05-26 2015-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4483430/ /pubmed/26157252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1511 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hachiya, Mizuki
Murata, Shin
Otao, Hiroshi
Kamijou, Kenji
Mizota, Katsuhiko
Asami, Toyoko
Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
title Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
title_full Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
title_fullStr Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
title_short Reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
title_sort reproducibility and validity of the 50-meter walking test in community-dwelling elderly
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1511
work_keys_str_mv AT hachiyamizuki reproducibilityandvalidityofthe50meterwalkingtestincommunitydwellingelderly
AT muratashin reproducibilityandvalidityofthe50meterwalkingtestincommunitydwellingelderly
AT otaohiroshi reproducibilityandvalidityofthe50meterwalkingtestincommunitydwellingelderly
AT kamijoukenji reproducibilityandvalidityofthe50meterwalkingtestincommunitydwellingelderly
AT mizotakatsuhiko reproducibilityandvalidityofthe50meterwalkingtestincommunitydwellingelderly
AT asamitoyoko reproducibilityandvalidityofthe50meterwalkingtestincommunitydwellingelderly