Cargando…

Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task

Every day, we face situations that involve multi-tasking. How our brain utilizes cortical resources during multi-tasking is one of many interesting research topics. In this study, we tested whether a dual-task can be differentiated in the neural and behavioral responses of healthy subjects with vary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Gusang, Lim, Sanghyun, Kim, Min-Young, Kwon, Hyukchan, Lee, Yong-Ho, Kim, Kiwoong, Lee, Eun-Ju, Suh, Minah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4484223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26175681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00381
_version_ 1782378627305832448
author Kwon, Gusang
Lim, Sanghyun
Kim, Min-Young
Kwon, Hyukchan
Lee, Yong-Ho
Kim, Kiwoong
Lee, Eun-Ju
Suh, Minah
author_facet Kwon, Gusang
Lim, Sanghyun
Kim, Min-Young
Kwon, Hyukchan
Lee, Yong-Ho
Kim, Kiwoong
Lee, Eun-Ju
Suh, Minah
author_sort Kwon, Gusang
collection PubMed
description Every day, we face situations that involve multi-tasking. How our brain utilizes cortical resources during multi-tasking is one of many interesting research topics. In this study, we tested whether a dual-task can be differentiated in the neural and behavioral responses of healthy subjects with varying degree of working memory capacity (WMC). We combined word recall and oculomotor tasks because they incorporate common neural networks including the fronto-parietal (FP) network. Three different types of oculomotor tasks (eye fixation, Fix-EM; predictive and random smooth pursuit eye movement, P-SPEM and R-SPEM) were combined with two memory load levels (low-load: five words, high-load: 10 words) for a word recall task. Each of those dual-task combinations was supposed to create varying cognitive loads on the FP network. We hypothesize that each dual-task requires different cognitive strategies for allocating the brain’s limited cortical resources and affects brain oscillation of the FP network. In addition, we hypothesized that groups with different WMC will show differential neural and behavioral responses. We measured oscillatory brain activity with simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings and behavioral performance by word recall. Prominent frontal midline (FM) theta (4–6 Hz) synchronization emerged in the EEG of the high-WMC group experiencing R-SPEM with high-load conditions during the early phase of the word maintenance period. Conversely, significant parietal upper alpha (10–12 Hz) desynchronization was observed in the EEG and MEG of the low-WMC group experiencing P-SPEM under high-load conditions during the same period. Different brain oscillatory patterns seem to depend on each individual’s WMC and varying attentional demands from different dual-task combinations. These findings suggest that specific brain oscillations may reflect different strategies for allocating cortical resources during combined word recall and oculomotor dual-tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4484223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44842232015-07-14 Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task Kwon, Gusang Lim, Sanghyun Kim, Min-Young Kwon, Hyukchan Lee, Yong-Ho Kim, Kiwoong Lee, Eun-Ju Suh, Minah Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Every day, we face situations that involve multi-tasking. How our brain utilizes cortical resources during multi-tasking is one of many interesting research topics. In this study, we tested whether a dual-task can be differentiated in the neural and behavioral responses of healthy subjects with varying degree of working memory capacity (WMC). We combined word recall and oculomotor tasks because they incorporate common neural networks including the fronto-parietal (FP) network. Three different types of oculomotor tasks (eye fixation, Fix-EM; predictive and random smooth pursuit eye movement, P-SPEM and R-SPEM) were combined with two memory load levels (low-load: five words, high-load: 10 words) for a word recall task. Each of those dual-task combinations was supposed to create varying cognitive loads on the FP network. We hypothesize that each dual-task requires different cognitive strategies for allocating the brain’s limited cortical resources and affects brain oscillation of the FP network. In addition, we hypothesized that groups with different WMC will show differential neural and behavioral responses. We measured oscillatory brain activity with simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings and behavioral performance by word recall. Prominent frontal midline (FM) theta (4–6 Hz) synchronization emerged in the EEG of the high-WMC group experiencing R-SPEM with high-load conditions during the early phase of the word maintenance period. Conversely, significant parietal upper alpha (10–12 Hz) desynchronization was observed in the EEG and MEG of the low-WMC group experiencing P-SPEM under high-load conditions during the same period. Different brain oscillatory patterns seem to depend on each individual’s WMC and varying attentional demands from different dual-task combinations. These findings suggest that specific brain oscillations may reflect different strategies for allocating cortical resources during combined word recall and oculomotor dual-tasks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4484223/ /pubmed/26175681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00381 Text en Copyright © 2015 Kwon, Lim, Kim, Kwon, Lee, Kim, Lee and Suh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kwon, Gusang
Lim, Sanghyun
Kim, Min-Young
Kwon, Hyukchan
Lee, Yong-Ho
Kim, Kiwoong
Lee, Eun-Ju
Suh, Minah
Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
title Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
title_full Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
title_fullStr Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
title_short Individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
title_sort individual differences in oscillatory brain activity in response to varying attentional demands during a word recall and oculomotor dual task
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4484223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26175681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00381
work_keys_str_mv AT kwongusang individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT limsanghyun individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT kimminyoung individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT kwonhyukchan individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT leeyongho individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT kimkiwoong individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT leeeunju individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask
AT suhminah individualdifferencesinoscillatorybrainactivityinresponsetovaryingattentionaldemandsduringawordrecallandoculomotordualtask