Cargando…

Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment

PURPOSE: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified patient-centeredness as crucial to quality health care. The IOM endorsed six patient-centeredness dimensions that stipulated that care must be: respectful to patients’ values, preferences, and expressed needs; coordinated and integrated; provide in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tzelepis, Flora, Sanson-Fisher, Robert W, Zucca, Alison C, Fradgley, Elizabeth A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4484696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150703
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81975
_version_ 1782378705777065984
author Tzelepis, Flora
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W
Zucca, Alison C
Fradgley, Elizabeth A
author_facet Tzelepis, Flora
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W
Zucca, Alison C
Fradgley, Elizabeth A
author_sort Tzelepis, Flora
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified patient-centeredness as crucial to quality health care. The IOM endorsed six patient-centeredness dimensions that stipulated that care must be: respectful to patients’ values, preferences, and expressed needs; coordinated and integrated; provide information, communication, and education; ensure physical comfort; provide emotional support; and involve family and friends. Patient-reported measures examine the patient’s perspective and are essential to the accurate assessment of patient-centered care. This article’s objectives are to: 1) use the six IOM-endorsed patient-centeredness dimensions as a framework to outline why patient-reported measures are crucial to the reliable measurement of patient-centered care; and 2) to identify existing patient-reported measures that assess each patient-centered care dimension. METHODS: For each IOM-endorsed patient-centeredness dimension, the published literature was searched to highlight the essential role of patients in assessing patient-centered care and informing quality improvement efforts. Existing literature was also searched to identify examples of patient-reported measures that assess each patient-centeredness dimension. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported measures are arguably the best way to measure patient-centeredness. For instance, patients are best positioned to determine whether care aligns with patient values, preferences, and needs and the Measure of Patient Preferences is an example of a patient-reported measure that does so. Furthermore, only the patient knows whether they received the level of information desired, and if information was understood and can be recalled. Patient-reported measures that examine information provision include the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-INFO25. In relation to physical comfort, only patients can report the severity of physical symptoms and whether medications provide adequate relief. Patient-reported measures that investigate physical comfort include the Pain Care Quality Survey and the Brief Pain Inventory. Using patient-reported measures to regularly measure patient-centered care is critical to identifying areas of health care where improvements are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4484696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44846962015-07-06 Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment Tzelepis, Flora Sanson-Fisher, Robert W Zucca, Alison C Fradgley, Elizabeth A Patient Prefer Adherence Perspectives PURPOSE: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified patient-centeredness as crucial to quality health care. The IOM endorsed six patient-centeredness dimensions that stipulated that care must be: respectful to patients’ values, preferences, and expressed needs; coordinated and integrated; provide information, communication, and education; ensure physical comfort; provide emotional support; and involve family and friends. Patient-reported measures examine the patient’s perspective and are essential to the accurate assessment of patient-centered care. This article’s objectives are to: 1) use the six IOM-endorsed patient-centeredness dimensions as a framework to outline why patient-reported measures are crucial to the reliable measurement of patient-centered care; and 2) to identify existing patient-reported measures that assess each patient-centered care dimension. METHODS: For each IOM-endorsed patient-centeredness dimension, the published literature was searched to highlight the essential role of patients in assessing patient-centered care and informing quality improvement efforts. Existing literature was also searched to identify examples of patient-reported measures that assess each patient-centeredness dimension. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported measures are arguably the best way to measure patient-centeredness. For instance, patients are best positioned to determine whether care aligns with patient values, preferences, and needs and the Measure of Patient Preferences is an example of a patient-reported measure that does so. Furthermore, only the patient knows whether they received the level of information desired, and if information was understood and can be recalled. Patient-reported measures that examine information provision include the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-INFO25. In relation to physical comfort, only patients can report the severity of physical symptoms and whether medications provide adequate relief. Patient-reported measures that investigate physical comfort include the Pain Care Quality Survey and the Brief Pain Inventory. Using patient-reported measures to regularly measure patient-centered care is critical to identifying areas of health care where improvements are needed. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4484696/ /pubmed/26150703 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81975 Text en © 2015 Tzelepis et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Tzelepis, Flora
Sanson-Fisher, Robert W
Zucca, Alison C
Fradgley, Elizabeth A
Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
title Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
title_full Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
title_fullStr Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
title_short Measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
title_sort measuring the quality of patient-centered care: why patient-reported measures are critical to reliable assessment
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4484696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150703
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81975
work_keys_str_mv AT tzelepisflora measuringthequalityofpatientcenteredcarewhypatientreportedmeasuresarecriticaltoreliableassessment
AT sansonfisherrobertw measuringthequalityofpatientcenteredcarewhypatientreportedmeasuresarecriticaltoreliableassessment
AT zuccaalisonc measuringthequalityofpatientcenteredcarewhypatientreportedmeasuresarecriticaltoreliableassessment
AT fradgleyelizabetha measuringthequalityofpatientcenteredcarewhypatientreportedmeasuresarecriticaltoreliableassessment