Cargando…

Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers

In skeletal muscle, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling requires depolarization-induced conformational rearrangements in L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) to be communicated to the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RYR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) via transient protein–prote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beqollari, Donald, Romberg, Christin F., Filipova, Dilyana, Meza, Ulises, Papadopoulos, Symeon, Bannister, Roger A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Rockefeller University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201411314
_version_ 1782378729588129792
author Beqollari, Donald
Romberg, Christin F.
Filipova, Dilyana
Meza, Ulises
Papadopoulos, Symeon
Bannister, Roger A.
author_facet Beqollari, Donald
Romberg, Christin F.
Filipova, Dilyana
Meza, Ulises
Papadopoulos, Symeon
Bannister, Roger A.
author_sort Beqollari, Donald
collection PubMed
description In skeletal muscle, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling requires depolarization-induced conformational rearrangements in L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) to be communicated to the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RYR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) via transient protein–protein interactions. Although the molecular mechanism that underlies conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 has been investigated intensely for more than 25 years, the question of whether such signaling occurs via a direct interaction between the principal, voltage-sensing α(1S) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 or through an intermediary protein persists. A substantial body of evidence supports the idea that the auxiliary β(1a) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 is a conduit for this intermolecular communication. However, a direct role for β(1a) has been difficult to test because β(1a) serves two other functions that are prerequisite for conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1. Specifically, β(1a) promotes efficient membrane expression of Ca(V)1.1 and facilitates the tetradic ultrastructural arrangement of Ca(V)1.1 channels within plasma membrane–SR junctions. In this paper, we demonstrate that overexpression of the RGK protein Rem, an established β subunit–interacting protein, in adult mouse flexor digitorum brevis fibers markedly reduces voltage-induced myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients without greatly affecting Ca(V)1.1 targeting, intramembrane gating charge movement, or releasable SR Ca(2+) store content. In contrast, a β(1a)-binding–deficient Rem triple mutant (R200A/L227A/H229A) has little effect on myoplasmic Ca(2+) release in response to membrane depolarization. Thus, Rem effectively uncouples the voltage sensors of Ca(V)1.1 from RYR1-mediated SR Ca(2+) release via its ability to interact with β(1a). Our findings reveal Rem-expressing adult muscle as an experimental system that may prove useful in the definition of the precise role of the β(1a) subunit in skeletal-type EC coupling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4485024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44850242016-01-01 Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers Beqollari, Donald Romberg, Christin F. Filipova, Dilyana Meza, Ulises Papadopoulos, Symeon Bannister, Roger A. J Gen Physiol Research Articles In skeletal muscle, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling requires depolarization-induced conformational rearrangements in L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) to be communicated to the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RYR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) via transient protein–protein interactions. Although the molecular mechanism that underlies conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 has been investigated intensely for more than 25 years, the question of whether such signaling occurs via a direct interaction between the principal, voltage-sensing α(1S) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 or through an intermediary protein persists. A substantial body of evidence supports the idea that the auxiliary β(1a) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 is a conduit for this intermolecular communication. However, a direct role for β(1a) has been difficult to test because β(1a) serves two other functions that are prerequisite for conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1. Specifically, β(1a) promotes efficient membrane expression of Ca(V)1.1 and facilitates the tetradic ultrastructural arrangement of Ca(V)1.1 channels within plasma membrane–SR junctions. In this paper, we demonstrate that overexpression of the RGK protein Rem, an established β subunit–interacting protein, in adult mouse flexor digitorum brevis fibers markedly reduces voltage-induced myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients without greatly affecting Ca(V)1.1 targeting, intramembrane gating charge movement, or releasable SR Ca(2+) store content. In contrast, a β(1a)-binding–deficient Rem triple mutant (R200A/L227A/H229A) has little effect on myoplasmic Ca(2+) release in response to membrane depolarization. Thus, Rem effectively uncouples the voltage sensors of Ca(V)1.1 from RYR1-mediated SR Ca(2+) release via its ability to interact with β(1a). Our findings reveal Rem-expressing adult muscle as an experimental system that may prove useful in the definition of the precise role of the β(1a) subunit in skeletal-type EC coupling. The Rockefeller University Press 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4485024/ /pubmed/26078055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201411314 Text en © 2015 Beqollari et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Beqollari, Donald
Romberg, Christin F.
Filipova, Dilyana
Meza, Ulises
Papadopoulos, Symeon
Bannister, Roger A.
Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
title Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
title_full Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
title_fullStr Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
title_full_unstemmed Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
title_short Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
title_sort rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201411314
work_keys_str_mv AT beqollaridonald remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers
AT rombergchristinf remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers
AT filipovadilyana remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers
AT mezaulises remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers
AT papadopoulossymeon remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers
AT bannisterrogera remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers