Cargando…
Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers
In skeletal muscle, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling requires depolarization-induced conformational rearrangements in L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) to be communicated to the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RYR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) via transient protein–prote...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Rockefeller University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201411314 |
_version_ | 1782378729588129792 |
---|---|
author | Beqollari, Donald Romberg, Christin F. Filipova, Dilyana Meza, Ulises Papadopoulos, Symeon Bannister, Roger A. |
author_facet | Beqollari, Donald Romberg, Christin F. Filipova, Dilyana Meza, Ulises Papadopoulos, Symeon Bannister, Roger A. |
author_sort | Beqollari, Donald |
collection | PubMed |
description | In skeletal muscle, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling requires depolarization-induced conformational rearrangements in L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) to be communicated to the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RYR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) via transient protein–protein interactions. Although the molecular mechanism that underlies conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 has been investigated intensely for more than 25 years, the question of whether such signaling occurs via a direct interaction between the principal, voltage-sensing α(1S) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 or through an intermediary protein persists. A substantial body of evidence supports the idea that the auxiliary β(1a) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 is a conduit for this intermolecular communication. However, a direct role for β(1a) has been difficult to test because β(1a) serves two other functions that are prerequisite for conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1. Specifically, β(1a) promotes efficient membrane expression of Ca(V)1.1 and facilitates the tetradic ultrastructural arrangement of Ca(V)1.1 channels within plasma membrane–SR junctions. In this paper, we demonstrate that overexpression of the RGK protein Rem, an established β subunit–interacting protein, in adult mouse flexor digitorum brevis fibers markedly reduces voltage-induced myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients without greatly affecting Ca(V)1.1 targeting, intramembrane gating charge movement, or releasable SR Ca(2+) store content. In contrast, a β(1a)-binding–deficient Rem triple mutant (R200A/L227A/H229A) has little effect on myoplasmic Ca(2+) release in response to membrane depolarization. Thus, Rem effectively uncouples the voltage sensors of Ca(V)1.1 from RYR1-mediated SR Ca(2+) release via its ability to interact with β(1a). Our findings reveal Rem-expressing adult muscle as an experimental system that may prove useful in the definition of the precise role of the β(1a) subunit in skeletal-type EC coupling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4485024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44850242016-01-01 Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers Beqollari, Donald Romberg, Christin F. Filipova, Dilyana Meza, Ulises Papadopoulos, Symeon Bannister, Roger A. J Gen Physiol Research Articles In skeletal muscle, excitation–contraction (EC) coupling requires depolarization-induced conformational rearrangements in L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) to be communicated to the type 1 ryanodine-sensitive Ca(2+) release channel (RYR1) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) via transient protein–protein interactions. Although the molecular mechanism that underlies conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 has been investigated intensely for more than 25 years, the question of whether such signaling occurs via a direct interaction between the principal, voltage-sensing α(1S) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1 or through an intermediary protein persists. A substantial body of evidence supports the idea that the auxiliary β(1a) subunit of Ca(V)1.1 is a conduit for this intermolecular communication. However, a direct role for β(1a) has been difficult to test because β(1a) serves two other functions that are prerequisite for conformational coupling between Ca(V)1.1 and RYR1. Specifically, β(1a) promotes efficient membrane expression of Ca(V)1.1 and facilitates the tetradic ultrastructural arrangement of Ca(V)1.1 channels within plasma membrane–SR junctions. In this paper, we demonstrate that overexpression of the RGK protein Rem, an established β subunit–interacting protein, in adult mouse flexor digitorum brevis fibers markedly reduces voltage-induced myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients without greatly affecting Ca(V)1.1 targeting, intramembrane gating charge movement, or releasable SR Ca(2+) store content. In contrast, a β(1a)-binding–deficient Rem triple mutant (R200A/L227A/H229A) has little effect on myoplasmic Ca(2+) release in response to membrane depolarization. Thus, Rem effectively uncouples the voltage sensors of Ca(V)1.1 from RYR1-mediated SR Ca(2+) release via its ability to interact with β(1a). Our findings reveal Rem-expressing adult muscle as an experimental system that may prove useful in the definition of the precise role of the β(1a) subunit in skeletal-type EC coupling. The Rockefeller University Press 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4485024/ /pubmed/26078055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201411314 Text en © 2015 Beqollari et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Beqollari, Donald Romberg, Christin F. Filipova, Dilyana Meza, Ulises Papadopoulos, Symeon Bannister, Roger A. Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
title | Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
title_full | Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
title_fullStr | Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
title_full_unstemmed | Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
title_short | Rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
title_sort | rem uncouples excitation–contraction coupling in adult skeletal muscle fibers |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201411314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beqollaridonald remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers AT rombergchristinf remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers AT filipovadilyana remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers AT mezaulises remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers AT papadopoulossymeon remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers AT bannisterrogera remuncouplesexcitationcontractioncouplinginadultskeletalmusclefibers |