Cargando…

Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

BACKGROUND: To establish computed tomography (CT) staging of middle ear cholesteatoma and assess its impact on the selection of the surgical procedure. MATERIAL/METHODS: Prospective study was conducted on 61 consecutive patients (mean age 26.8 years) with middle ear cholesteatoma. CT scan of the tem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel, Ghonim, Mohamed Rashad, Ashraf, Bassem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171086
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.894155
_version_ 1782378799198896128
author Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
Ghonim, Mohamed Rashad
Ashraf, Bassem
author_facet Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
Ghonim, Mohamed Rashad
Ashraf, Bassem
author_sort Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To establish computed tomography (CT) staging of middle ear cholesteatoma and assess its impact on the selection of the surgical procedure. MATERIAL/METHODS: Prospective study was conducted on 61 consecutive patients (mean age 26.8 years) with middle ear cholesteatoma. CT scan of the temporal bone and surgery were performed in all patients. CT staging classified cholesteatoma according to its location in the tympanic cavity (T); extension into the mastoid (M); and associated complications (C). Cholesteatoma was staged as stage I (T1, T2), stage II (T3, M1, M2, C1), and stage III (C2). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of CT staging of cholesteatoma compared to surgery was 88% with excellent agreement and correlation between CT findings and intra-operative findings (K=0.863, r=0.86, P=0.001). There was excellent agreement and correlation of CT staging with surgical findings for T location (K=0.811, r=0.89, P=0.001), good for M extension (K=0.734, r=0.88, P=0.001), and excellent for associated C complications (K=1.00, r=1.0, P=0.001). Atticotympanotomy was carried out in stage I (n=14), intact canal wall surgery was performed in stage II (n=38), and canal wall down surgery was done in stage III (n=5) and stage II (n=4). CONCLUSIONS: We established CT staging of middle ear cholesteatoma that helps surgeons to select an appropriate surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4485650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44856502015-07-13 Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Ghonim, Mohamed Rashad Ashraf, Bassem Pol J Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: To establish computed tomography (CT) staging of middle ear cholesteatoma and assess its impact on the selection of the surgical procedure. MATERIAL/METHODS: Prospective study was conducted on 61 consecutive patients (mean age 26.8 years) with middle ear cholesteatoma. CT scan of the temporal bone and surgery were performed in all patients. CT staging classified cholesteatoma according to its location in the tympanic cavity (T); extension into the mastoid (M); and associated complications (C). Cholesteatoma was staged as stage I (T1, T2), stage II (T3, M1, M2, C1), and stage III (C2). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of CT staging of cholesteatoma compared to surgery was 88% with excellent agreement and correlation between CT findings and intra-operative findings (K=0.863, r=0.86, P=0.001). There was excellent agreement and correlation of CT staging with surgical findings for T location (K=0.811, r=0.89, P=0.001), good for M extension (K=0.734, r=0.88, P=0.001), and excellent for associated C complications (K=1.00, r=1.0, P=0.001). Atticotympanotomy was carried out in stage I (n=14), intact canal wall surgery was performed in stage II (n=38), and canal wall down surgery was done in stage III (n=5) and stage II (n=4). CONCLUSIONS: We established CT staging of middle ear cholesteatoma that helps surgeons to select an appropriate surgery. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4485650/ /pubmed/26171086 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.894155 Text en © Pol J Radiol, 2015 This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
Ghonim, Mohamed Rashad
Ashraf, Bassem
Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
title Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
title_full Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
title_fullStr Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
title_short Computed Tomography Staging of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma
title_sort computed tomography staging of middle ear cholesteatoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171086
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/PJR.894155
work_keys_str_mv AT razekahmedabdelkhalekabdel computedtomographystagingofmiddleearcholesteatoma
AT ghonimmohamedrashad computedtomographystagingofmiddleearcholesteatoma
AT ashrafbassem computedtomographystagingofmiddleearcholesteatoma