Cargando…
Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is widely recommended as part of a risk-reduction strategy for ovarian or breast cancer due to an underlying genetic predisposition. BSO is also performed as a therapeutic intervention for patients with hormone-positive p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170692 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S82570 |
_version_ | 1782378824639447040 |
---|---|
author | Angioni, Stefano Pontis, Alessandro Sedda, Federica Zampetoglou, Theodoros Cela, Vito Mereu, Liliana Litta, Pietro |
author_facet | Angioni, Stefano Pontis, Alessandro Sedda, Federica Zampetoglou, Theodoros Cela, Vito Mereu, Liliana Litta, Pietro |
author_sort | Angioni, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is widely recommended as part of a risk-reduction strategy for ovarian or breast cancer due to an underlying genetic predisposition. BSO is also performed as a therapeutic intervention for patients with hormone-positive premenopausal breast cancer. BSO may be performed via a minimally invasive approach with the use of three to four 5 mm and/or 12 mm ports inserted through a skin incision. To further reduce the morbidity associated with the placement of multiple port sites and to improve cosmetic outcomes, single-port laparoscopy has been developed with a single access point from the umbilicus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes associated with reducing the risks of salpingo-oophorectomy performed in a single port, while comparing multiport laparoscopy in women with a high risk for ovarian cancer. Single-port laparoscopy–BSO is feasible and safe, with favorable surgical and cosmetic outcomes when compared to conventional laparoscopy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4485856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44858562015-07-13 Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes Angioni, Stefano Pontis, Alessandro Sedda, Federica Zampetoglou, Theodoros Cela, Vito Mereu, Liliana Litta, Pietro Onco Targets Ther Study Protocol Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is widely recommended as part of a risk-reduction strategy for ovarian or breast cancer due to an underlying genetic predisposition. BSO is also performed as a therapeutic intervention for patients with hormone-positive premenopausal breast cancer. BSO may be performed via a minimally invasive approach with the use of three to four 5 mm and/or 12 mm ports inserted through a skin incision. To further reduce the morbidity associated with the placement of multiple port sites and to improve cosmetic outcomes, single-port laparoscopy has been developed with a single access point from the umbilicus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes associated with reducing the risks of salpingo-oophorectomy performed in a single port, while comparing multiport laparoscopy in women with a high risk for ovarian cancer. Single-port laparoscopy–BSO is feasible and safe, with favorable surgical and cosmetic outcomes when compared to conventional laparoscopy. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4485856/ /pubmed/26170692 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S82570 Text en © 2015 Angioni et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Angioni, Stefano Pontis, Alessandro Sedda, Federica Zampetoglou, Theodoros Cela, Vito Mereu, Liliana Litta, Pietro Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
title | Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
title_full | Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
title_fullStr | Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
title_short | Single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
title_sort | single-port versus conventional multiport access prophylactic laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients for ovarian cancer: a comparison of surgical outcomes |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170692 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S82570 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angionistefano singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes AT pontisalessandro singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes AT seddafederica singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes AT zampetogloutheodoros singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes AT celavito singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes AT mereuliliana singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes AT littapietro singleportversusconventionalmultiportaccessprophylacticlaparoscopicbilateralsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskpatientsforovariancanceracomparisonofsurgicaloutcomes |