Cargando…

EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis

BACKGROUND: Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dosen, Strahinja, Markovic, Marko, Somer, Kelef, Graimann, Bernhard, Farina, Dario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z
_version_ 1782378825099771904
author Dosen, Strahinja
Markovic, Marko
Somer, Kelef
Graimann, Bernhard
Farina, Dario
author_facet Dosen, Strahinja
Markovic, Marko
Somer, Kelef
Graimann, Bernhard
Farina, Dario
author_sort Dosen, Strahinja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded using surface electrodes. Furthermore, the sensory feedback from the prosthesis to the user is still missing. In this study, we present a novel concept to close the loop in myoelectric prostheses. In addition to conveying the grasping force (system output), we provided to the user the online information about the system input (EMG biofeedback). METHODS: As a proof-of-concept, the EMG biofeedback was transmitted in the current study using a visual interface (ideal condition). Ten able-bodied subjects and two amputees controlled a state-of-the-art myoelectric prosthesis in routine grasping and force steering tasks using EMG and force feedback (novel approach) and force feedback only (classic approach). The outcome measures were the variability of the generated forces and absolute deviation from the target levels in the routine grasping task, and the root mean square tracking error and the number of sudden drops in the force steering task. RESULTS: During the routine grasping, the novel method when used by able-bodied subjects decreased twofold the force dispersion as well as absolute deviations from the target force levels, and also resulted in a more accurate and stable tracking of the reference force profiles during the force steering. Furthermore, the force variability during routine grasping did not increase for the higher target forces with EMG biofeedback. The trend was similar in the two amputees. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the subjects, including the two experienced users of a myoelectric prosthesis, were able to exploit the online EMG biofeedback to observe and modulate the myoelectric signals, generating thereby more consistent commands. This allowed them to control the force predictively (routine grasping) and with a finer resolution (force steering). The future step will be to implement this promising and simple approach using an electrotactile interface. A prosthesis with a reliable response, following faithfully user intentions, would improve the utility during daily-life use and also facilitate the embodiment of the assistive system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4485858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44858582015-07-01 EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis Dosen, Strahinja Markovic, Marko Somer, Kelef Graimann, Bernhard Farina, Dario J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded using surface electrodes. Furthermore, the sensory feedback from the prosthesis to the user is still missing. In this study, we present a novel concept to close the loop in myoelectric prostheses. In addition to conveying the grasping force (system output), we provided to the user the online information about the system input (EMG biofeedback). METHODS: As a proof-of-concept, the EMG biofeedback was transmitted in the current study using a visual interface (ideal condition). Ten able-bodied subjects and two amputees controlled a state-of-the-art myoelectric prosthesis in routine grasping and force steering tasks using EMG and force feedback (novel approach) and force feedback only (classic approach). The outcome measures were the variability of the generated forces and absolute deviation from the target levels in the routine grasping task, and the root mean square tracking error and the number of sudden drops in the force steering task. RESULTS: During the routine grasping, the novel method when used by able-bodied subjects decreased twofold the force dispersion as well as absolute deviations from the target force levels, and also resulted in a more accurate and stable tracking of the reference force profiles during the force steering. Furthermore, the force variability during routine grasping did not increase for the higher target forces with EMG biofeedback. The trend was similar in the two amputees. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the subjects, including the two experienced users of a myoelectric prosthesis, were able to exploit the online EMG biofeedback to observe and modulate the myoelectric signals, generating thereby more consistent commands. This allowed them to control the force predictively (routine grasping) and with a finer resolution (force steering). The future step will be to implement this promising and simple approach using an electrotactile interface. A prosthesis with a reliable response, following faithfully user intentions, would improve the utility during daily-life use and also facilitate the embodiment of the assistive system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4485858/ /pubmed/26088323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z Text en © Dosen et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dosen, Strahinja
Markovic, Marko
Somer, Kelef
Graimann, Bernhard
Farina, Dario
EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
title EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
title_full EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
title_fullStr EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
title_short EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
title_sort emg biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dosenstrahinja emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis
AT markovicmarko emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis
AT somerkelef emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis
AT graimannbernhard emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis
AT farinadario emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis