Cargando…
EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis
BACKGROUND: Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded usi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z |
_version_ | 1782378825099771904 |
---|---|
author | Dosen, Strahinja Markovic, Marko Somer, Kelef Graimann, Bernhard Farina, Dario |
author_facet | Dosen, Strahinja Markovic, Marko Somer, Kelef Graimann, Bernhard Farina, Dario |
author_sort | Dosen, Strahinja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded using surface electrodes. Furthermore, the sensory feedback from the prosthesis to the user is still missing. In this study, we present a novel concept to close the loop in myoelectric prostheses. In addition to conveying the grasping force (system output), we provided to the user the online information about the system input (EMG biofeedback). METHODS: As a proof-of-concept, the EMG biofeedback was transmitted in the current study using a visual interface (ideal condition). Ten able-bodied subjects and two amputees controlled a state-of-the-art myoelectric prosthesis in routine grasping and force steering tasks using EMG and force feedback (novel approach) and force feedback only (classic approach). The outcome measures were the variability of the generated forces and absolute deviation from the target levels in the routine grasping task, and the root mean square tracking error and the number of sudden drops in the force steering task. RESULTS: During the routine grasping, the novel method when used by able-bodied subjects decreased twofold the force dispersion as well as absolute deviations from the target force levels, and also resulted in a more accurate and stable tracking of the reference force profiles during the force steering. Furthermore, the force variability during routine grasping did not increase for the higher target forces with EMG biofeedback. The trend was similar in the two amputees. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the subjects, including the two experienced users of a myoelectric prosthesis, were able to exploit the online EMG biofeedback to observe and modulate the myoelectric signals, generating thereby more consistent commands. This allowed them to control the force predictively (routine grasping) and with a finer resolution (force steering). The future step will be to implement this promising and simple approach using an electrotactile interface. A prosthesis with a reliable response, following faithfully user intentions, would improve the utility during daily-life use and also facilitate the embodiment of the assistive system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4485858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44858582015-07-01 EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis Dosen, Strahinja Markovic, Marko Somer, Kelef Graimann, Bernhard Farina, Dario J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded using surface electrodes. Furthermore, the sensory feedback from the prosthesis to the user is still missing. In this study, we present a novel concept to close the loop in myoelectric prostheses. In addition to conveying the grasping force (system output), we provided to the user the online information about the system input (EMG biofeedback). METHODS: As a proof-of-concept, the EMG biofeedback was transmitted in the current study using a visual interface (ideal condition). Ten able-bodied subjects and two amputees controlled a state-of-the-art myoelectric prosthesis in routine grasping and force steering tasks using EMG and force feedback (novel approach) and force feedback only (classic approach). The outcome measures were the variability of the generated forces and absolute deviation from the target levels in the routine grasping task, and the root mean square tracking error and the number of sudden drops in the force steering task. RESULTS: During the routine grasping, the novel method when used by able-bodied subjects decreased twofold the force dispersion as well as absolute deviations from the target force levels, and also resulted in a more accurate and stable tracking of the reference force profiles during the force steering. Furthermore, the force variability during routine grasping did not increase for the higher target forces with EMG biofeedback. The trend was similar in the two amputees. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the subjects, including the two experienced users of a myoelectric prosthesis, were able to exploit the online EMG biofeedback to observe and modulate the myoelectric signals, generating thereby more consistent commands. This allowed them to control the force predictively (routine grasping) and with a finer resolution (force steering). The future step will be to implement this promising and simple approach using an electrotactile interface. A prosthesis with a reliable response, following faithfully user intentions, would improve the utility during daily-life use and also facilitate the embodiment of the assistive system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4485858/ /pubmed/26088323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z Text en © Dosen et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dosen, Strahinja Markovic, Marko Somer, Kelef Graimann, Bernhard Farina, Dario EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
title | EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_full | EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_fullStr | EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed | EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_short | EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
title_sort | emg biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dosenstrahinja emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis AT markovicmarko emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis AT somerkelef emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis AT graimannbernhard emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis AT farinadario emgbiofeedbackforonlinepredictivecontrolofgraspingforceinamyoelectricprosthesis |