Cargando…

Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey

Introduction: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has published a Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) statement on incorporating an imaging-guided surveillance protocol to replace the current practice of four-quadrant biopsies every two cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Appannagari, Anoop, Soudagar, A. Samad, Pietrzak, Constance, Sharma, Prateek, Gupta, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391413
_version_ 1782378845362454528
author Appannagari, Anoop
Soudagar, A. Samad
Pietrzak, Constance
Sharma, Prateek
Gupta, Neil
author_facet Appannagari, Anoop
Soudagar, A. Samad
Pietrzak, Constance
Sharma, Prateek
Gupta, Neil
author_sort Appannagari, Anoop
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has published a Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) statement on incorporating an imaging-guided surveillance protocol to replace the current practice of four-quadrant biopsies every two centimeters for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) surveillance. We sought to determine if current gastroenterologists would be willing to apply these changes to their practice and identify any barriers to implementation. Methods: We collected data using surveys that were distributed at two national meetings and using a random selection process emailed surveys to members listed in the American Gastroenterological Association directory. Physicians from a variety of practice settings participated. Primary outcomes of our study included determining whether clinicians would be willing to accept an imaging-based surveillance protocol, their reasons for not doing so, and whether a financial incentive would be persuade them to implement the protocol. Continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were summarized with percentages and 95 % confidence intervals. Results: Gastroenterologists (172) completed the survey; and 140 (81.4 %) of them stated they would implemented the PIVI recommendations into practice. Using a multivariate analysis of the data, physicians who reported a financial incentive for submitting biopsy specimens to pathology were less likely to implement the PIVI recommendations. The two main barriers to implementation of the protocol were medical-legal and financial reasons. Of the 32 gastroenterologists who were not willing to implement the imaging-guided surveillance protocol, 20 (62.5 %) stated that they would implement it if there were a financial incentive. Discussion: The PIVI statement focuses on re-evaluating our current method of surveillance for BE. The results of our survey show that gastroenterologists may be willing to implement an imaging-guided surveillance program, but concerns regarding financial compensation and proper training in advanced imaging techniques remain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4486030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44860302015-07-13 Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey Appannagari, Anoop Soudagar, A. Samad Pietrzak, Constance Sharma, Prateek Gupta, Neil Endosc Int Open Article Introduction: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has published a Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) statement on incorporating an imaging-guided surveillance protocol to replace the current practice of four-quadrant biopsies every two centimeters for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) surveillance. We sought to determine if current gastroenterologists would be willing to apply these changes to their practice and identify any barriers to implementation. Methods: We collected data using surveys that were distributed at two national meetings and using a random selection process emailed surveys to members listed in the American Gastroenterological Association directory. Physicians from a variety of practice settings participated. Primary outcomes of our study included determining whether clinicians would be willing to accept an imaging-based surveillance protocol, their reasons for not doing so, and whether a financial incentive would be persuade them to implement the protocol. Continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were summarized with percentages and 95 % confidence intervals. Results: Gastroenterologists (172) completed the survey; and 140 (81.4 %) of them stated they would implemented the PIVI recommendations into practice. Using a multivariate analysis of the data, physicians who reported a financial incentive for submitting biopsy specimens to pathology were less likely to implement the PIVI recommendations. The two main barriers to implementation of the protocol were medical-legal and financial reasons. Of the 32 gastroenterologists who were not willing to implement the imaging-guided surveillance protocol, 20 (62.5 %) stated that they would implement it if there were a financial incentive. Discussion: The PIVI statement focuses on re-evaluating our current method of surveillance for BE. The results of our survey show that gastroenterologists may be willing to implement an imaging-guided surveillance program, but concerns regarding financial compensation and proper training in advanced imaging techniques remain. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-06 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4486030/ /pubmed/26171427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391413 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Appannagari, Anoop
Soudagar, A. Samad
Pietrzak, Constance
Sharma, Prateek
Gupta, Neil
Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey
title Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey
title_full Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey
title_fullStr Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey
title_short Are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus? Results from a national survey
title_sort are gastroenterologists willing to implement imaging-guided surveillance for barrett’s esophagus? results from a national survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391413
work_keys_str_mv AT appannagarianoop aregastroenterologistswillingtoimplementimagingguidedsurveillanceforbarrettsesophagusresultsfromanationalsurvey
AT soudagarasamad aregastroenterologistswillingtoimplementimagingguidedsurveillanceforbarrettsesophagusresultsfromanationalsurvey
AT pietrzakconstance aregastroenterologistswillingtoimplementimagingguidedsurveillanceforbarrettsesophagusresultsfromanationalsurvey
AT sharmaprateek aregastroenterologistswillingtoimplementimagingguidedsurveillanceforbarrettsesophagusresultsfromanationalsurvey
AT guptaneil aregastroenterologistswillingtoimplementimagingguidedsurveillanceforbarrettsesophagusresultsfromanationalsurvey