Cargando…

Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Competing health concerns present real obstacles to people living with diabetes and other chronic diseases as well as to their primary care providers. Guideline implementation interventions rarely acknowledge this, leaving both patients and providers feeling overwhelmed by the volume of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Catherine H., Ivers, Noah M., Stacey, Dawn, Rezmovitz, Jeremy, Telner, Deanna, Thorpe, Kevin, Hall, Susan, Settino, Marc, Kaplan, David M., Coons, Michael, Sodhi, Sumeet, Sale, Joanna, Straus, Sharon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8
_version_ 1782378858758012928
author Yu, Catherine H.
Ivers, Noah M.
Stacey, Dawn
Rezmovitz, Jeremy
Telner, Deanna
Thorpe, Kevin
Hall, Susan
Settino, Marc
Kaplan, David M.
Coons, Michael
Sodhi, Sumeet
Sale, Joanna
Straus, Sharon E.
author_facet Yu, Catherine H.
Ivers, Noah M.
Stacey, Dawn
Rezmovitz, Jeremy
Telner, Deanna
Thorpe, Kevin
Hall, Susan
Settino, Marc
Kaplan, David M.
Coons, Michael
Sodhi, Sumeet
Sale, Joanna
Straus, Sharon E.
author_sort Yu, Catherine H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Competing health concerns present real obstacles to people living with diabetes and other chronic diseases as well as to their primary care providers. Guideline implementation interventions rarely acknowledge this, leaving both patients and providers feeling overwhelmed by the volume of recommended actions. Interprofessional (IP) shared decision-making (SDM) with the use of decision aids may help to set treatment priorities. We developed an evidence-based SDM intervention for patients with diabetes and other conditions that was framed by the IP-SDM model and followed a user-centered approach. Our objective in the present study is to pilot an IP-SDM and goal-setting toolkit following the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to assess (1) intervention fidelity and the feasibility of conducting a larger trial and (2) impact on decisional conflict, diabetes distress, health-related quality of life and patient assessment of chronic illness care. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-step, parallel-group, clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted, with the primary goal being to assess intervention fidelity and the feasibility of conducting a larger RCT. The first step is a provider-directed implementation only; the second (after a 6-month delay) involves both provider- and patient-directed implementation. Half of the clusters will be assigned to receive the IP-SDM toolkit, and the other will be assigned to be mailed a diabetes guidelines summary. Individual interviews with patients, their family members and health care providers will be conducted upon trial completion to explore toolkit use. A secondary purpose of this trial is to gather estimates of the toolkit’s impact on decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes include diabetes distress, quality of life and chronic illness care, which will be assessed on the basis of patient-completed questionnaires of validated scales at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Multilevel hierarchical regression models will be used to account for the clustered nature of the data. DISCUSSION: An individualized approach to patients with multiple chronic conditions using SDM and goal setting is a desirable strategy for achieving guideline-concordant treatment in a patient-centered fashion. Our pilot trial will provide insights regarding strategies for the routine implementation of such interventions in clinical practice, and it will offer an assessment of the impact of this approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: 11 February 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4486130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44861302015-07-01 Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Yu, Catherine H. Ivers, Noah M. Stacey, Dawn Rezmovitz, Jeremy Telner, Deanna Thorpe, Kevin Hall, Susan Settino, Marc Kaplan, David M. Coons, Michael Sodhi, Sumeet Sale, Joanna Straus, Sharon E. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Competing health concerns present real obstacles to people living with diabetes and other chronic diseases as well as to their primary care providers. Guideline implementation interventions rarely acknowledge this, leaving both patients and providers feeling overwhelmed by the volume of recommended actions. Interprofessional (IP) shared decision-making (SDM) with the use of decision aids may help to set treatment priorities. We developed an evidence-based SDM intervention for patients with diabetes and other conditions that was framed by the IP-SDM model and followed a user-centered approach. Our objective in the present study is to pilot an IP-SDM and goal-setting toolkit following the Knowledge-to-Action Framework to assess (1) intervention fidelity and the feasibility of conducting a larger trial and (2) impact on decisional conflict, diabetes distress, health-related quality of life and patient assessment of chronic illness care. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-step, parallel-group, clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted, with the primary goal being to assess intervention fidelity and the feasibility of conducting a larger RCT. The first step is a provider-directed implementation only; the second (after a 6-month delay) involves both provider- and patient-directed implementation. Half of the clusters will be assigned to receive the IP-SDM toolkit, and the other will be assigned to be mailed a diabetes guidelines summary. Individual interviews with patients, their family members and health care providers will be conducted upon trial completion to explore toolkit use. A secondary purpose of this trial is to gather estimates of the toolkit’s impact on decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes include diabetes distress, quality of life and chronic illness care, which will be assessed on the basis of patient-completed questionnaires of validated scales at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Multilevel hierarchical regression models will be used to account for the clustered nature of the data. DISCUSSION: An individualized approach to patients with multiple chronic conditions using SDM and goal setting is a desirable strategy for achieving guideline-concordant treatment in a patient-centered fashion. Our pilot trial will provide insights regarding strategies for the routine implementation of such interventions in clinical practice, and it will offer an assessment of the impact of this approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: 11 February 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4486130/ /pubmed/26116444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8 Text en © Yu et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Yu, Catherine H.
Ivers, Noah M.
Stacey, Dawn
Rezmovitz, Jeremy
Telner, Deanna
Thorpe, Kevin
Hall, Susan
Settino, Marc
Kaplan, David M.
Coons, Michael
Sodhi, Sumeet
Sale, Joanna
Straus, Sharon E.
Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26116444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yucatherineh impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT iversnoahm impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT staceydawn impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rezmovitzjeremy impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT telnerdeanna impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thorpekevin impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hallsusan impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT settinomarc impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaplandavidm impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coonsmichael impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sodhisumeet impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT salejoanna impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT straussharone impactofaninterprofessionalshareddecisionmakingandgoalsettingdecisionaidforpatientswithdiabetesondecisionalconflictstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial