Cargando…
Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature
Contact precautions are widely recommended to prevent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. However, conflicting data exist regarding their effectiveness. Prior systematic reviews examined contact precautions as part of a larger bundled approach, limiting ability to understand their effe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26051927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.05.003 |
_version_ | 1782378904423497728 |
---|---|
author | Cohen, C.C. Cohen, B. Shang, J. |
author_facet | Cohen, C.C. Cohen, B. Shang, J. |
author_sort | Cohen, C.C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Contact precautions are widely recommended to prevent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. However, conflicting data exist regarding their effectiveness. Prior systematic reviews examined contact precautions as part of a larger bundled approach, limiting ability to understand their effectiveness. The aim of this review was to characterize the effectiveness of contact precautions alone against transmission of any MDRO among adult acute care patients. Directed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, comprehensive searches of four electronic scientific literature databases were conducted for studies published in English from January 2004 to June 2014. Studies were included if interventional, original research, evaluating contact isolation precautions against MDRO transmission among inpatients. Searches returned 284 studies, six of which were included in the review. These studies measured four different MDROs with one study showing a reduction in transmission. Whereas studies were of high quality regarding outcome operationalization and statistical analyses, overall quality was moderate to low due to poor intervention description, population characterization and potential biases. Where compliance was measured (N = 4), it presented a threat to validity because it included select parts of the intervention, ranged from 21% to 87%, and was significantly different across study phases (N = 2). The poor quality of evidence on this topic continues to limit interpretation of these data. Hence, this conflicting body of literature does not constitute evidence for or against contact precautions. We recommend that researchers consider power calculation, compliance monitoring, non-equivalent concurrent controls when designing future studies on this topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4486607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44866072016-08-01 Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature Cohen, C.C. Cohen, B. Shang, J. J Hosp Infect Article Contact precautions are widely recommended to prevent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. However, conflicting data exist regarding their effectiveness. Prior systematic reviews examined contact precautions as part of a larger bundled approach, limiting ability to understand their effectiveness. The aim of this review was to characterize the effectiveness of contact precautions alone against transmission of any MDRO among adult acute care patients. Directed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, comprehensive searches of four electronic scientific literature databases were conducted for studies published in English from January 2004 to June 2014. Studies were included if interventional, original research, evaluating contact isolation precautions against MDRO transmission among inpatients. Searches returned 284 studies, six of which were included in the review. These studies measured four different MDROs with one study showing a reduction in transmission. Whereas studies were of high quality regarding outcome operationalization and statistical analyses, overall quality was moderate to low due to poor intervention description, population characterization and potential biases. Where compliance was measured (N = 4), it presented a threat to validity because it included select parts of the intervention, ranged from 21% to 87%, and was significantly different across study phases (N = 2). The poor quality of evidence on this topic continues to limit interpretation of these data. Hence, this conflicting body of literature does not constitute evidence for or against contact precautions. We recommend that researchers consider power calculation, compliance monitoring, non-equivalent concurrent controls when designing future studies on this topic. The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2015-08 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4486607/ /pubmed/26051927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.05.003 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Cohen, C.C. Cohen, B. Shang, J. Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
title | Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full | Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
title_short | Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26051927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.05.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cohencc effectivenessofcontactprecautionsagainstmultidrugresistantorganismtransmissioninacutecareasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT cohenb effectivenessofcontactprecautionsagainstmultidrugresistantorganismtransmissioninacutecareasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT shangj effectivenessofcontactprecautionsagainstmultidrugresistantorganismtransmissioninacutecareasystematicreviewoftheliterature |