Cargando…

Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal bone level and patient satisfaction in 1-implant and 2-implant assisted mandibular overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who had maladaptive mandibular dentures were treated in this study. Patients were randomly divided int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavakolizadeh, Sara, Vafaee, Fariborz, Khoshhal, Masume, Ebrahimzadeh, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140170
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.191
_version_ 1782378904874385408
author Tavakolizadeh, Sara
Vafaee, Fariborz
Khoshhal, Masume
Ebrahimzadeh, Zahra
author_facet Tavakolizadeh, Sara
Vafaee, Fariborz
Khoshhal, Masume
Ebrahimzadeh, Zahra
author_sort Tavakolizadeh, Sara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal bone level and patient satisfaction in 1-implant and 2-implant assisted mandibular overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who had maladaptive mandibular dentures were treated in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 1 implant (Simple line II, Implantium, South Korea) in their mandibular midline and the second group received 2 implants in their B and D regions (according to Misch's category). If the primary stability of each implant was at least 60 ISQ, ball attachment was placed and denture relined with soft liner. After 6 weeks, retentive cap incorporated with hard acrylic resin. In the 6 and 12 months recalls, periapical digital radiograph were made and visual analogue scale questionnaires were used to record patient satisfaction. The Friedman test was done for comparing the presurgical and postsurgical parameters in each group and the U-Mann Whitney test (P<.05) was done for comparison of post-treatment results between the two groups. RESULTS: All implants achieved sufficient primary stability to be immediately loaded. Patient satisfaction was high, and there were no significant differences between two groups (P>.05). In addition, mean marginal bone loss was 0.6 ± 0.67 mm in the first group and 0.6 ± 0.51 mm in the second group, after 12 month. Mean marginal bone loss showed no significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: This preliminary one-year result indicated that mandibular overdentures anchored to a single implant can be a safe and cost-effective method as a starting step for implant-overdenture treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4486614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44866142015-07-02 Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading Tavakolizadeh, Sara Vafaee, Fariborz Khoshhal, Masume Ebrahimzadeh, Zahra J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal bone level and patient satisfaction in 1-implant and 2-implant assisted mandibular overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who had maladaptive mandibular dentures were treated in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 1 implant (Simple line II, Implantium, South Korea) in their mandibular midline and the second group received 2 implants in their B and D regions (according to Misch's category). If the primary stability of each implant was at least 60 ISQ, ball attachment was placed and denture relined with soft liner. After 6 weeks, retentive cap incorporated with hard acrylic resin. In the 6 and 12 months recalls, periapical digital radiograph were made and visual analogue scale questionnaires were used to record patient satisfaction. The Friedman test was done for comparing the presurgical and postsurgical parameters in each group and the U-Mann Whitney test (P<.05) was done for comparison of post-treatment results between the two groups. RESULTS: All implants achieved sufficient primary stability to be immediately loaded. Patient satisfaction was high, and there were no significant differences between two groups (P>.05). In addition, mean marginal bone loss was 0.6 ± 0.67 mm in the first group and 0.6 ± 0.51 mm in the second group, after 12 month. Mean marginal bone loss showed no significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: This preliminary one-year result indicated that mandibular overdentures anchored to a single implant can be a safe and cost-effective method as a starting step for implant-overdenture treatment. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2015-06 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4486614/ /pubmed/26140170 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.191 Text en © 2015 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tavakolizadeh, Sara
Vafaee, Fariborz
Khoshhal, Masume
Ebrahimzadeh, Zahra
Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
title Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
title_full Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
title_fullStr Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
title_short Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
title_sort comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140170
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.191
work_keys_str_mv AT tavakolizadehsara comparisonofmarginalbonelossandpatientsatisfactioninsingleanddoubleimplantassistedmandibularoverdenturebyimmediateloading
AT vafaeefariborz comparisonofmarginalbonelossandpatientsatisfactioninsingleanddoubleimplantassistedmandibularoverdenturebyimmediateloading
AT khoshhalmasume comparisonofmarginalbonelossandpatientsatisfactioninsingleanddoubleimplantassistedmandibularoverdenturebyimmediateloading
AT ebrahimzadehzahra comparisonofmarginalbonelossandpatientsatisfactioninsingleanddoubleimplantassistedmandibularoverdenturebyimmediateloading