Cargando…
Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the amount of marginal gap with two different substructure materials using identical margin preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty stainless steel models with a chamfer were prepared with a CNC device. Marginal gap measurements of the galvano copings...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.257 |
_version_ | 1782378906703101952 |
---|---|
author | Karaman, Tahir Ulku, Sabiha Zelal Zengingul, Ali Ihsan Guven, Sedat Eratilla, Veysel Sumer, Ebru |
author_facet | Karaman, Tahir Ulku, Sabiha Zelal Zengingul, Ali Ihsan Guven, Sedat Eratilla, Veysel Sumer, Ebru |
author_sort | Karaman, Tahir |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the amount of marginal gap with two different substructure materials using identical margin preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty stainless steel models with a chamfer were prepared with a CNC device. Marginal gap measurements of the galvano copings on these stainless steel models and Co-Cr copings obtained by a laser-sintering method were made with a stereomicroscope device before and after the cementation process and surface properties were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A dependent t-test was used to compare the mean of the two groups for normally distributed data, and two-way variance analysis was used for more than two data sets. Pearson's correlation analysis was also performed to assess relationships between variables. RESULTS: According to the results obtained, the marginal gap in the galvano copings before cementation was measured as, on average, 24.47 ± 5.82 µm before and 35.11 ± 6.52 µm after cementation; in the laser-sintered Co-Cr structure, it was, on average, 60.45 ± 8.87 µm before and 69.33 ± 9.03 µm after cementation. A highly significant difference (P<.001) was found in marginal gap measurements of galvano copings and a significant difference (P<.05) was found in marginal gap measurements of the laser-sintered Co-Cr copings. According to the SEM examination, surface properties of laser sintered Co-Cr copings showed rougher structure than galvano copings. The galvano copings showed a very smooth surface. CONCLUSION: Marginal gaps values of both groups before and after cementation were within the clinically acceptable level. The smallest marginal gaps occurred with the use of galvano copings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4486622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44866222015-07-02 Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials Karaman, Tahir Ulku, Sabiha Zelal Zengingul, Ali Ihsan Guven, Sedat Eratilla, Veysel Sumer, Ebru J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the amount of marginal gap with two different substructure materials using identical margin preparations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty stainless steel models with a chamfer were prepared with a CNC device. Marginal gap measurements of the galvano copings on these stainless steel models and Co-Cr copings obtained by a laser-sintering method were made with a stereomicroscope device before and after the cementation process and surface properties were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A dependent t-test was used to compare the mean of the two groups for normally distributed data, and two-way variance analysis was used for more than two data sets. Pearson's correlation analysis was also performed to assess relationships between variables. RESULTS: According to the results obtained, the marginal gap in the galvano copings before cementation was measured as, on average, 24.47 ± 5.82 µm before and 35.11 ± 6.52 µm after cementation; in the laser-sintered Co-Cr structure, it was, on average, 60.45 ± 8.87 µm before and 69.33 ± 9.03 µm after cementation. A highly significant difference (P<.001) was found in marginal gap measurements of galvano copings and a significant difference (P<.05) was found in marginal gap measurements of the laser-sintered Co-Cr copings. According to the SEM examination, surface properties of laser sintered Co-Cr copings showed rougher structure than galvano copings. The galvano copings showed a very smooth surface. CONCLUSION: Marginal gaps values of both groups before and after cementation were within the clinically acceptable level. The smallest marginal gaps occurred with the use of galvano copings. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2015-06 2015-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4486622/ /pubmed/26140178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.257 Text en © 2015 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karaman, Tahir Ulku, Sabiha Zelal Zengingul, Ali Ihsan Guven, Sedat Eratilla, Veysel Sumer, Ebru Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
title | Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
title_full | Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
title_fullStr | Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
title_short | Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
title_sort | evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4486622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140178 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.257 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karamantahir evaluationandcomparisonofthemarginaladaptationoftwodifferentsubstructurematerials AT ulkusabihazelal evaluationandcomparisonofthemarginaladaptationoftwodifferentsubstructurematerials AT zengingulaliihsan evaluationandcomparisonofthemarginaladaptationoftwodifferentsubstructurematerials AT guvensedat evaluationandcomparisonofthemarginaladaptationoftwodifferentsubstructurematerials AT eratillaveysel evaluationandcomparisonofthemarginaladaptationoftwodifferentsubstructurematerials AT sumerebru evaluationandcomparisonofthemarginaladaptationoftwodifferentsubstructurematerials |